State of the art and prospects of structured sensing matrices in compressed sensing

Kezhi LI, Shuang CONG

PDF(513 KB)
PDF(513 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (5) : 665-677. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-015-3326-8
REVIEW ARTICLE

State of the art and prospects of structured sensing matrices in compressed sensing

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Compressed sensing (CS) enables people to acquire the compressed measurements directly and recover sparse or compressible signals faithfully even when the sampling rate is much lower than the Nyquist rate. However, the pure random sensing matrices usually require huge memory for storage and high computational cost for signal reconstruction. Many structured sensing matrices have been proposed recently to simplify the sensing scheme and the hardware implementation in practice. Based on the restricted isometry property and coherence, couples of existing structured sensing matrices are reviewed in this paper, which have special structures, high recovery performance, and many advantages such as the simple construction, fast calculation and easy hardware implementation. The number of measurements and the universality of different structure matrices are compared.

Keywords

compressed sensing / structured sensing matrices / RIP / coherence

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Kezhi LI, Shuang CONG. State of the art and prospects of structured sensing matrices in compressed sensing. Front. Comput. Sci., 2015, 9(5): 665‒677 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-015-3326-8

References

[1]
Shannon C. Communication in the presence of noise. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE), 1949, 37(1): 10−21
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Nyquist H. Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1928, 47(2): 617−644
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Donoho D L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(7): 1289−1306
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Candès E, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(2): 489−509
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Candès E, Tao T. Near optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52: 5406−5425
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Candès E, Wakin M. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2008, 25(2): 21−30
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Baraniuk R. Compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2007, 24(4): 118−121
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Candès E, Romberg J. Practical signal recovery from random projections. Proceedings of Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers, 2005, 5674: 76−86
[9]
Haupt J, Nowak R. Signal reconstruction from noisy random projections. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(9): 4036−4048
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Candès E, Romberg J. Quantitative robust uncertainty principles and optimally sparse decompositions. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 2006, 6(8): 227−254
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Donoho D, Elad M, Temlyakov V. Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(1): 6−18
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Tropp J, Gilbert A. Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2007, 53(12): 4655−4666
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Calderbank R, Howard S, Jafarpour S. Construction of a large class of deterministic sensing matrices that satisfy a statistical isometry property. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2010, 4(2): 358−374
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Donoho D L, Elad M. Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via l 1 minimization. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 2003, 100(5): 2197−2202
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Tropp J. Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2004, 50(10): 2231−2242
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Candès E, Plan Y. Near-ideal model selection by l 1 minimization. Annals of Statistics, 2009, 37(5): 2145−2177
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Rudelson M, Vershynin R. On sparse reconstruction from Fourier and Gaussian measurements. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2008, 61(8): 1025−1045
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Duarte M, Eldar Y. Structured compressed sensing: From theory to applications. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(9): 4053−4085
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Candès E, Plan Y. A probabilistic and RIPless theory of com-pressed sensing. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, 2011, 57(11): 7235−7254
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Candès E, Romberg J. Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling. Inverse Problems, 2007, 23(6): 969−985
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Bajwa W U, Haupt J D, Raz G M, Wright S J, Nowak R D. Toeplitzstructured compressed sensing matrices. In: Proceedings of IEEE/SP the 14th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing. 2007, 8: 294−298
[22]
Haupt J, Bajwa W, Raz G, Nowak R. Toeplitz compressed sensing matrices with applications to sparse channel estimation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2010, 56(11): 5862−5875
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Rauhut H. Circulant and Toeplitz matrices in compressed sensing. In: Proceedings of Signal Processing with Adaptive Sparse Structured Representations. 2009, 1−6
[24]
Tropp J, Laska J, Duarte M, Romberg J, Baraniuk R. Beyond Nyquist: Effcient sampling of sparse bandlimited signals. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2010, 56(1): 520−544
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Romberg J. Compressive sensing by random convolution. SIAM Journal on Imaging Scicences, 2009, 2(4): 1098−1128
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Romberg J. Sensing by random convolution. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing. 2007, 137−140
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Do T, Gan L, Nguyen N, Tran T. Fast and efficient compressive sensing using structurally random matrices. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2012, 60(1): 139−154
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Do T, Tran T and Gan L. Fast compressive sampling with structurally random matrices. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech, Signal Process. 2008, 3369−3372
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Rauhut H, Romberg J, Tropp J. Restricted isometries for partial random circulate matrices. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2012, 32(2): 242−254
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Zepernick H J, Finger A. Pseudo Random Signal Processing: Theory and Application. West Sussex: Wiley, 2005
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Fan P Z, Darnell M. The synthesis of perfect sequences. Lec-ture notes in Computer Science, 1995, 1025: 63−73
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Applebaum L, Howard S, Searle S, Calderbank R. Chirp sensing codes: deterministic compressed sensing measurements for fast recovery. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2009, 26(2): 283−290
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Gan L, Li K, Ling C. Golay meets hadamard: golay-paired hadamard matrices for fast compressed sensing. In: Proceedings of Information Theory Workshop. 2012, 637−641
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Li K, Gan L, Ling C. Convolutional compressed sensing using deterministic sequences. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(3): 740−752
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Gan L, Li K, Ling C. Novel Toeplitz sensing matrices for compressing radar imaging. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Compressed Sensing Applied to Radar Imaging. 2012, 1−6
[36]
Gan L. Block compressed sensing of natural images. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Signal Processing. 2007, 403−406
[37]
Sebert F, Zou Y M, Ying L. Toeplitz block matrices in compressed sensing and their applications in imaging. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Technology and Applications. 2008, 47−50
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Gan L, Do T, Tran T. Fast compressive imaging using scram-bled block Hadamard ensemble. In: Proceedings of European Signal Processing Conference. 2008, 1−6
[39]
Devore R A. Deterministic construction of compressed sensing matrices. Journal of Complexity, 2007, 23: 918−925
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Saligrama V. Deterministic designs with deterministic guarantees: Toeplitz compressed sensing matrices, sequence design and system identfication. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2012, 99
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Iwen M A. Simple deterministically constructible RIP matrices with sub-linear Fourier sampling requirements. In: Proceedings of Conference in Information Sciences and Systems. 2008, 870−875
[42]
Monajemi H, Jafarpour S, Gavish M, D. Donoho L, Ambikasaran S, Bacallado S, Bharadia D, Chen Y, Choi Y, Chowdhury M. Deterministic matrices matching the compressed sensing phase transitions of Gaussian random matrices. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(4): 1181−1186
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Howard S, Calderbank A, and Searle S, A fast reconstruction algorithm for deterministic compressive sensing using second order reed muller codes. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems. 2008, 11−15
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Ailon N, Liberty E. Fast dimension reduction using rademacher series on dual BCH codes. In: Proceedings of Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 2008, 1−6
[45]
Calderbank R, Howard S, Jafarpour S. A sublinear algorithm for sparse reconstruction with l 2/l 2 recovery guarantees. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing. 2009, 209−212
[46]
Yu N Y. Deterministic compressed sensing matrices from multiplicative character sequences. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems. 2011, 1−5
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Alltop W. Complex sequences with low periodic correlations. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, 1980, 26(3): 350−354
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Strohmer T, Heath R. Grassmanian frames with applications to coding and communication. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2003, 14: 257−275
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Chen W, Rodrigues M, Wassell I. Projection design for statistical compressive sensing: a tight frame based approach. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(8): 2016−2029
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Rauhut H. Compressive sensing and structured random matrices. In: Radon Series Computational and Applied Mathematics, Theoretical Foundations and Numerical Methods for Sparse Recovery. New York: DeGruyter, 2010, 9: 1−92
[51]
Compressive sensing resources.
[52]
Mishali M and Eldar Y, From theory to practice: sub-nyquist sampling of sparse wideband analog signals. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2010, 4(2): 375−391
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Li K, Ling C, Gan L. Deterministic compressed sensing matrices: where Toeplitz meets Golay. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 2011, 3748−3751
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Li K, Gao S, Ling C, Gan L. Wynerziv coding for distributed compressive sensing. In: Proceedings of Workshop of Signal Processing with Adaptive Sparse Structured Representations, 2011, 1−6
[55]
Lustig M, Donoho D, Santos J, Pauly J. Compressed sensing MRI. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2008, 25(2): 72−82
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Gorodnitsky I F, George J, Rao B. Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. Electrocephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1995, 95: 231−251
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly J M. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2007, 58(6): 1182−1195
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Duarte M F, Davenport M A, Takhar D, Laska J N, Sun T, Kelly K F, Baraniuk R G. Single pixel imaging via compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2008, 83−91
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Sampsell J. An overview of the digital micromirror device (DMD) and its application to projection displays. In: Proceedings of International Symposium Digest Technical Papers, 1993, 24: 1012−1015
[60]
Takhar D, Laska J, Wakin M, Duarte M, Baron D, Sarvotham S, Kelly K, Baraniuk R. A new compressive imaging camera architecture using optical-domain compression. Computational Imaging IV, 2006, 606: 43−52
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Chan W L, Charan K, Takhar D, Kelly K F, Baraniuk R G, Mittleman D M. A single-pixel terahertz imaging system based on compressive sensing. Applied Physics Letters, 2008, 93(12)
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Shen H, Newman N, Gan L, Zhong S, Huang Y, Shen Y. Com-pressed terahertz imaging system using a spin disk. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves. 2010, 1−2
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Gilbert A, Indyk P. Sparse recovery using sparse matrices. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2010, 98(6): 937−947
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Xu W, Hassibi B. Efficient compressive sensing with deterministic guarantees using expander graphs. In: Proceeding of IEEE Information Theory Workshop. 2007, 414−419
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Krzakala F, Mezard M, Sausset F, Sun Y F, Zdeborova L. Statisticalphysics-based reconstruction in compressed sensing. Physical Review X2, 021005, 2012
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2015 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(513 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/