Some new distance measures for type-2 fuzzy sets and distance measure based ranking for group decision making problems

Abstract

In this paper, we propose some distance measures between type-2 fuzzy sets, and also a new family of utmost distance measures are presented. Several properties of different proposed distance measures have been introduced. Also, we have introduced a new ranking method for the ordering of type-2 fuzzy sets based on the proposed distance measure. The proposed ranking method satisfies the reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities. Some properties such as robustness, order relation have been presented. Limitations of existing ranking methods have been studied. Further for practical use, a new method for selecting the best alternative, for group decision making problems is proposed. This method is illustrated with a numerical example.

Keywords

fuzzy sets / type-2 fuzzy sets / distancemeasures / ranking function / group decision making problems

References

[1] Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—i. Information Sciences, 1975, 8(3): 199-249

[2] Dubois D J. Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Volume 144. Academic press, 1980

[3] N Karnik N, M Mendel J. Operations on type-2 fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2001, 122(2): 327-348

[4] Mizumoto M, Tanaka K. Some properties of fuzzy sets of type 2. Information and Control, 1976, 31(4): 312-340

[5] Liang Q, Mendel J M. Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(5): 535-550

[6] Mendel J M, John R B. Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2002, 10(2): 117-127

[7] Yager R R. Fuzzy subsets of type ii in decisions. Cybernetics and System, 1980, 10(1-3): 137-159

[8] Hisdal E. The if then else statement and interval-valued fuzzy sets of higher type. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1981, 15(4): 385-455

[9] Mendel J M, Wu H. New results about the centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set, including the centroid of a fuzzy granule. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(2): 360-377

[10] Wu D, Mendel J M. A comparative study of ranking methods, similarity measures and uncertainty measures for interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 2009, 179(8): 1169-1192

[11] Türksen I B. Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(2): 191-210

[12] Türkşen I B. Type 2 representation and reasoning for cww. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2002, 127(1): 17-36

[13] John R. Type 2 fuzzy sets: an appraisal of theory and applications. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 1998, 6(6): 563-576

[14] John R, Czarnecki C. A type 2 adaptive fuzzy inferencing system. In: 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1998, 2068-2073

[15] Mitchell H. Ranking type-2 fuzzy numbers. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2006, 14(2): 287-294

[16] Hung W L, Yang M S. Similarity measures between type-2 fuzzy sets. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2004, 12(06): 827-841

[17] Mitchell H. Correlation coefficient for type-2 fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2006, 21(2): 143-153

[18] Yang M S, Lin D C. On similarity and inclusion measures between type-2 fuzzy sets with an application to clustering. Computers &Mathematics with Applications, 2009, 57(6): 896-907

[19] Yang M S, Shih H M. Cluster analysis based on fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2001, 120(2): 197-212

[20] Hwang C M, Yang M S, Hung W L, Stanley Lee E. Similarity, inclusion and entropy measures between type-2 fuzzy sets based on the sugeno integral. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2011, 53(9): 1788-1797

[21] Kacprzyk J. Multistage fuzzy control: a prescriptive approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997

[22] Ivanescu A M, Wichterich M, Beecks C, Seidl T. The classi coefficient for the evaluation of ranking quality in the presence of class similarities. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2012, 6(5): 568-580

[23] Jia L, Xi J, Li M, Liu Y, Miao D. Eti: an efficient index for set similarity queries. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2012, 6(6): 700-712

[24] Li X, Mao W, Zeng D. Forecasting complex group behavior via multiple plan recognition. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2012, 6(1): 102-110

[25] Qin Z, Wan T. Hybrid bayesian estimation tree learning with discrete and fuzzy labels. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2013, 7(6): 852-863

[26] Jin C, Zhang J, Zhou A. Continuous ranking on uncertain streams. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2012, 6(6): 686-699

[27] Kumar A, Singh P, Kaur P, Kaur A. A new approach for ranking of LR type generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(9): 10906-10910

[28] Kumar A, Singh P, Kaur P, Kaur A. Rm approach for ranking of L-R type generalized fuzzy numbers. Soft Computing, 2011, 15(7): 1373-1381

[29] Singh P. A new approach for the ranking of fuzzy sets with different heights. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 2012, 10(6): 941-949

[30] Singh P. A new similarity measure between interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2013

[31] Verma M, Kumar A, Singh P, Singh Y. Risk analysis of combustion system using vague ranking method. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2013, 24(4): 765-773

[32] Verma M, Kumar A, Singh Y, Allahviranloo T. Application of nonnormal p-norm trapezoidal fuzzy number in reliability evaluation of electrical substations. Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, 23(2): 531-539

[33] Wang X, Kerre E E. Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (i). Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2001, 118(3): 375-385

[34] Chen S M, Yang M W, Lee L W, Yang S W. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(5): 5295-5308

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg