A co-evolving memetic wrapper for prediction of patient outcomes in TCM informatics
Dion DETTERER, Paul KWAN, Cedric GONDRO
A co-evolving memetic wrapper for prediction of patient outcomes in TCM informatics
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) relies on the combined effects of herbs within prescribed formulae. However, given the combinatorial explosion due to the vast number of herbs available for treatment, the study of these combined effects can become computationally intractable. Thus feature selection has become increasingly crucial as a pre-processing step prior to the study of combined effects in TCM informatics. In accord with this goal, a new feature selection algorithm known as a co-evolving memetic wrapper (COW) is proposed in this paper. COW takes advantage of recent research in genetic algorithms (GAs) and memetic algorithms (MAs) by evolving appropriate feature subsets for a given domain. Our empirical experiments have demonstrated that COW is capable of selecting subsets of herbs from a TCM insomnia dataset that shows signs of combined effects on the prediction of patient outcomes measured in terms of classification accuracy. We compare the proposed algorithm with results from statistical analysis including main effects and up to three way interaction terms and show that COW is capable of correctly identifying the herbs and herb by herb effects that are significantly associated to patient outcome prediction.
genetic algorithm / memetic algorithm / wrapper / feature selection / traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) / informatics
[1] |
Wing Y K. Herbal treatment of insomnia. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2001, 7(4): 392-402
|
[2] |
Chen K, Yu B. Certain progress of clinical research on Chinese integrative medicine. Chinese Medical Journal, 1999, 112(10): 934-937
|
[3] |
Zhou X, Chen S, Liu B, Zhang R, Wang Y, Li P, Guo Y, Zhang H, Gao Z, Yan X. Development of traditional Chinese medicine clinical data warehouse for medical knowledge discovery and decision support. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2010, 48(2-3): 139-152
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Ritchie M D, Hahn L W, Roodi N, Bailey L R, Dupont W D, Parl F F, Moore J H. Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2001, 69(1): 138-147
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Zhou X, Poon J, Kwan P, Zhang R, Wang Y, Poon S, Liu B, Sze D. Novel two-stage analytic approach in extraction of strong herb-herb interactions in TCM clinical treatment of insomnia. In: Zhang D, Sonka M, eds. Medical Biometrics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 6165: 258-267
|
[6] |
Michalewicz Z. Genetic Algorithms+ Data Structures= Evolution Programs. 3rd ed. London: Springer-Verlag, 1996
|
[7] |
Guyon I, Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3: 1157-1182
|
[8] |
Kononenko I, Šimec E, Robnik-Šikonja M. Overcoming the myopia of inductive learning algorithms with RELIEF-F. Applied Intelligence, 1997, 7(1): 39-55
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Zhu Z, Ong Y S, Dash M. Wrapper-filter feature selection algorithm using a memetic framework. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 2007, 37(1): 70-76
|
[10] |
Smith J E. Coevolving memetic algorithms: a review and progress report. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 2007, 37(1): 6-17
|
[11] |
Baker J E. Adaptive selection methods for genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithm and Their Applications. 1985, 101-111
|
/
〈 | 〉 |