Two of a kind or the ratings game? Adaptive pairwise preferences and latent factor models

Abstract

Latent factor models have become a workhorse for a large number of recommender systems.While these systems are built using ratings data, which is typically assumed static, the ability to incorporate different kinds of subsequent user feedback is an important asset. For instance, the user might want to provide additional information to the system in order to improve his personal recommendations. To this end, we examine a novel scheme for efficiently learning (or refining) user parameters from such feedback. We propose a scheme where users are presented with a sequence of pairwise preference questions: “Do you prefer item A over B?” User parameters are updated based on their response, and subsequent questions are chosen adaptively after incorporating the feedback. We operate in a Bayesian framework and the choice of questions is based on an information gain criterion. We validate the scheme on the Netflix movie ratings data set and a proprietary television viewership data set. A user study and automated experiments validate our findings.

Keywords

recommender systems / latent factor models / pairwise preferences / active learning

References

[1] Sarma A D, Sarma A D, Gollapudi S, Panigrahy R. Ranking mechanisms in twitter-like forums. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 2010, 21-30

[2] Goldberg D, Nichols D, Oki B M, Terry D. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 1992, 35(12): 61-70

[3] Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Computer, 2009, 42(8): 30-37

[4] Agarwal D, Chen B C. Regression-based latent factor models. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2009, 19-28

[5] Hu Y, Koren Y, Volinsky C. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2008, 263-272

[6] Hacker S, von Ahn L. Matchin: eliciting user preferences with an online game. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2009, 1207-1216

[7] Liu N N, Zhao M, Yang Q. Probabilistic latent preference analysis for collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2009, 759-766

[8] Rendle S, Freudenthaler C, Gantner Z, Schmidt-Thieme L. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 2009, 452-461

[9] Boutilier C, Zemel R S, Marlin B. Active collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 19th Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 2003, 98-106

[10] Jin R, Si L. A Bayesian approach toward active learning for collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 2004, 278-285

[11] Harpale A S, Yang Y. Personalized active learning for collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2008, 91-98

[12] Mackay D J C. Bayesian methods for adaptive models. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology, 1992

[13] Minka T P. Expectation propagation for approximate Bayesian inference. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 2001, 362-369

[14] Qi Y, Minka T P, Picard R W, Ghahramani Z. Predictive automatic relevance determination by expectation propagation. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning. 2004

[15] Park S T, Chu W. Pairwise preference regression for cold-start recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 2009, 21-28

[16] Elo A. The Rating of Chessplayers, Past and Present. New York: Arco Publications, 1978

[17] Herbrich R, Minka, T, Graepel T. TrueSkill^TM: a Bayesian skill rating system. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2007, 569-576

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg