Automatic object classification using motion blob based local feature fusion for traffic scene surveillance

Zhaoxiang ZHANG, Yunhong WANG

PDF(667 KB)
PDF(667 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (5) : 537-546. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-012-1296-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Automatic object classification using motion blob based local feature fusion for traffic scene surveillance

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Automatic object classification in traffic scene videos is an important issue for intelligent visual surveillance with great potential for all kinds of security applications. However, this problem is very challenging for the following reasons. Firstly, regions of interest in videos are of low resolution and limited size due to the capacity of conventional surveillance cameras. Secondly, the intra-class variations are very large due to changes of view angles, lighting conditions, and environments. Thirdly, real-time performance of algorithms is always required for real applications. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of local feature descriptors for automatic object classification in traffic scenes. Image intensity or gradient information is directly used to construct effective feature vectors from regions of interest extracted via motion detection. This strategy has great advantages of efficiency compared to various complicated texture features. We not only analyze and evaluate the performance of different feature descriptors, but also fuse different scales and features to achieve better performance. Numerous experiments are conducted and experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of this strategy with robustness to noise, variance of view angles, lighting conditions, and environments.

Keywords

visual surveillance / object classification / motion detection / feature fusion

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhaoxiang ZHANG, Yunhong WANG. Automatic object classification using motion blob based local feature fusion for traffic scene surveillance. Front Comput Sci, 2012, 6(5): 537‒546 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-012-1296-7

References

[1]
Brown L. View independent vehicle/person classification. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2nd International Workshop on Video Surveillance & Sensor Networks. 2004, 114-123
[2]
Rivlin E, Rudzsky M, Goldenberg R, Bogomolov U, Lepchev S. A realtime system for classification of moving objects. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 2002, 688-691
[3]
Grimson W, Stauffer C, Romano R, Lee L. Using adaptive tracking to classify and monitor activities in a site. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1998, 22-29
[4]
Zhou Q, Aggarwal J. Tracking and classifying moving objects from video. In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance. 2001
[5]
Zhang Z, Cai Y, Huang K, Tan T. Real-time moving object classification with automatic scene division. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP ’07. 2007, 149-152
[6]
Tan T, Sullivan G, Baker K. Model-based localisation and recognition of road vehicles. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1998, 27(1): 5-25
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Zhang Z, Dong W, Huang K, Tan T. Eda approach for model based localization and recognition of vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2007, 1-8
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Yan P, Khan S, Shah M. 3D model based object class detection in an arbitrary view. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV ’07. 2007, 1-6
[9]
Everingham M, Gool L, Williams C, Winn J, Zisserman A. The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2010, 88(2): 303-338
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Han F, Shan Y, Cekander R, Sawhney H, Kumar R. A two-stage approach to people and vehicle detection with hog-based svm. In: Proceedings of Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop in Conjunction with the IEEE Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics Conference. 2006
[11]
Viola P, Jones M, Snow D. Detecting pedestrians using patterns of motion and appearance. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2003, 734-741
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Bicego M, Castellani U, Murino V. A hidden markov model approach for appearance-based 3D object recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2005, 26(16): 2588-2599
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Zitova B, Flusser J. Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing, 2003, 21(11): 977-1000
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Lowe D. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91-110
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Belongie S, Malik J, Puzicha J. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2002, 24(4): 509-522
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2005, 27(10): 1615-1630
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Gehler P, Nowozin S. On feature combination for multiclass object classification. In: Proccedings of the IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009, 221-228
[18]
Munoz D, Bagnell J, Vandapel N, Hebert M. Contextual classification with functional max-margin markov networks. In: Proccedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR ’09. 2009, 975-982
[19]
Grzegorzek M, Sav S, O’Connor N, Izquierdo E. Local wavelet features for statistical object classification and localization. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2010, 17(1): 118
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maenpaa T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2002, 24(7): 971-987
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Lazebnik S, Schmid C, Ponce J. A sparse texture representation using local affine regions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2005, 27(8): 1265-1278
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Burges C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1998, 2(2): 121-167
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2000, 28(2): 337-407
[24]
Zhang Z, Li M, Huang K, Tan T. Boosting local feature descriptors for automatic objects classification in traffic scene surveillance. In: Proccedings of the 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR ’08. 2008, 1-4
[25]
Stauffer C, Grimson W. Adaptive background mixture models for realtime tracking. In: Proccedings of the 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR’ 99. 1999
[26]
Liu Z, Huang K, Tan T, Wang L. Cast shadow removal with GMM for surface reflectance component. In: Proccedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR ’06. 2006, 727-730

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(667 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/