Non-cooperative optimization games in market-oriented overlay networks: an integrated model of resource pricing and network formation

Yutaka OKAIE, Tadashi NAKANO

PDF(473 KB)
PDF(473 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 496-505. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-011-0190-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Non-cooperative optimization games in market-oriented overlay networks: an integrated model of resource pricing and network formation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In this paper, we formulate a non-cooperative optimization game in market-oriented overlay networks where participating peers share their own computing resources to earn virtual money called energy. We model an overlay network as a set of non-cooperative resource providing peers, called platforms, that perform resource pricing and topology management to maximize their own energy gains. Resource consuming peers, called agents, are simply designed to migrate platform-to-platform to find the least expensive resources in the network. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the market dynamics as well as the global properties of the network, i.e., resource price and network topology, that emerge from local interactions among the group of peers.

Keywords

Overlay networks / market mechanisms / non-cooperative games / mobile agents

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yutaka OKAIE, Tadashi NAKANO. Non-cooperative optimization games in market-oriented overlay networks: an integrated model of resource pricing and network formation. Front Comput Sci Chin, 2011, 5(4): 496‒505 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-011-0190-z

References

[1]
Turner D A, Ross K W. A lightweight currency paradigm for the p2p resource market. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Electronic Commerce Research, 2004
[2]
Nakano T, Suda T. Self-organizing network services with evolutionary adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2005, 16(5): 1269–1278
[3]
Bredin J, Kotz D, and, Rus D. Market-based resource control for mobile agents. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents. 1998, 197–204
[4]
Nakano T, Suda T. Applying biological principles to designs of network services. Applied Soft Computing, 2007, 7(3): 870–878
[5]
Balasubramaniam S, Botvich D, Carroll R, Mineraud J, Nakano T, Suda T, Donnelly W. Adaptive dynamic routing supporting service management for future internet. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference. 2009, 4926–4932
[6]
Suzuki J, Suda T. A middleware platform for a biologically-inspired network architecture supporting autonomous and adaptive applications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2005, 23(2): 249–260
[7]
Boonma P, Suzuki J. Bisnet: a biologically-inspired middleware architecture for self-managing wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 2007, 51(16): 4599–4616
[8]
Wang M, Suda T. The bio-networking architecture: A biologically inspired approach to the design of scalable, adaptive, and survivable/available network applications. In: Proceedings of 2001 Symposium on Applications and the Internet. 2001, 43–53
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Ma W Y, Shen B, Brassil J. Content services network: the architecture and protocols. In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Web Content Caching and Distribution. 2001, 89–107
[10]
Buyya R, Chee S. Yeo, and S. Venugopal. Marketoriented cloud computing: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering it services as computing utilities. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications. 2008, 5–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Nakano T, Okaie Y. Cooperative resource pricing in service overlay networks for mobile agents. IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2010, E93-B(7): 1927–1930
[12]
Okaie Y, Nakano T. Modeling and simulation of market-oriented service overlay networks. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems. 2010, 125–132
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Okaie Y, Nakano T. Price stability in peer-to-peer resource markets.In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing . 2010, 531–534
[14]
Okaie Y, Nakano T. Dynamics and convergence of resource prices in market-oriented overlay networks. In: Proceedings of 5th International ICST Conference on BioInspired Models of Network, Information, and Computing System. 2010
[15]
Okaie Y, Nakano T. A game theoretic framework for peer-to-peer market economy. International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing, 2011, 2(3): 183–195
[16]
Okaie Y, Nakano T. Resource pricing games on graphs: existence of nash equilibria. (preprint).
[17]
Okaie Y, Nakano T. Simulating the network dynamics in market-oriented overlay networks. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management. 2010, 1–4
[18]
Okaie Y, Nakano T. Network formation games in non-cooperative service overlay networks. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 2011 (in press)
[19]
Pajek. http://pajek.imfm.si/doku.php.
[20]
Wang W, Li B. Market-driven bandwidth allocation in selfish overlay networks. In: Proceedings of 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. 2005, 2578–2589
[21]
Adler M, Kumar R, Ross K, Rubenstein D, Suel T, Yao D D. Optimal peer selection for p2p downloading and streaming. In: Proceedings of 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. 2005, 1538–1549
[22]
Eger K, Killat U. Resource pricing in peer-to-peer networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 2007, 11(1): 82–84
[23]
Fabrikant A, Luthra A, Maneva E, Papadimitriou C H, Shenker S. On a network creation game. In: Proceedings of 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. 2003, 347–351
[24]
Chun B G, Fonseca R, Stoica I, Kubiatowicz J. Characterizing selfishly constructed overlay routing networks. In: Proceedings of 23rd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. 2004, 1329–1339
[25]
Wang Y, Nakao A. On cooperative and efficient overlay network evolution based on a group selection pattern. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 2010, 40(2): 493–504

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the Nakajima Foundation, and Kayamori Foundation of Informational Science Advancement , and KAKENHI 23650028.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(473 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/