Methodological choices of HR research conducted in Asia

Karin Sanders, Julie A. Cogin, Cai-Hui Veronica Lin

PDF(1108 KB)
PDF(1108 KB)
Front. Bus. Res. China ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 167-185. DOI: 10.1186/s11782-017-0011-9
Orginal Article

Methodological choices of HR research conducted in Asia

Author information +
History +

Abstract

A twenty-year study of the Human Resource (HR) practices– outcome relationship has found that more rigorous methodologies have been adopted over time. However, several problematic features such as cross-sectional, single-informant, and single-level designs continue to be adopted (Bainbridge et al., Human Resource Management, 2016). Responding to calls for increased contextualization of research by investigating the relationship between the location of data collection and the methodological choices of researchers, this study answers the question “How unique are the methodological choices of HR research conducted in Asia?” Applying content analysis to 241 published articles, we compare internal, external, construct and statistical conclusion validity of studies collected in North America (n=66), Europe (n=95) and Asia (n=80, including 57 studies from China). Results show that despite similarities in cross-sectional, single-informant and single-level designs across regions, research conducted in Asia is mainly undertaken via field studies, using subjective outcome measures at the organizational level, following a post-predictive design. In addition, studies from Asia are more recent, and show a shorter time gap between data collection and publication. Theoretical and practical implications embedded in the dynamic context of Asia in general, and China more specifically are discussed.

Keywords

Methodological choices / Validity / HR practices / China / Contextualization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Karin Sanders, Julie A. Cogin, Cai-Hui Veronica Lin. Methodological choices of HR research conducted in Asia. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2017, 11(2): 167‒185 https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-017-0011-9

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 Higher Education Press and Springer
PDF(1108 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/