Advancements in Understanding Catalyst Reconstruction During Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction

Abstract

Electrochemical CO₂ reduction reaction (CO₂RR) has received great attention to solve CO₂- induced global warming and carbon neutrality. It is essential to enhance the electrochemical CO₂RR selectivity, activity, and long-term stability for sustainable manufacturing of specific chemicals via CO₂RR. To produce multi-carbon (C₂₊) chemicals, Cu-based heterogeneous catalysts have been developed in terms of defect engineering, morphological design, and facet control. Despite the substantial efforts for the design of efficient Cu-based heterogeneous catalysts, there exist inevitable structural changes of catalysts with continuous dissolution and redeposition during CO₂RR. This reconstruction modifies the as-synthesized catalysts into an unpredictable structure and leads to changes in active site. Here, we review the reconstruction of Cu-based catalysts during CO₂RR, which occurs via continuous dissolution and redeposition process. This includes fundamental principles of reconstruction and the effect of microenvironment on reconstruction during CO₂RR. We offer research progress about the reconstruction of Cu-based electrocatalysts, analysis methodologies to track the reconstruction, and the insight to improve the activity, selectivity, and stability of CO₂RR. We provide perspective to understand and harness the reconstruction for the development of efficient CO₂RR catalysts.

Keywords

carbon neutrality / CO₂ reduction reaction / electrocatalysts / heterogeneous catalysts / reconstruction

References

[1] D. Gao, I. Sinev, F. Scholten, et al., “Selective CO₂ Electroreduction to Ethylene and Multicarbon Alcohols via Electrolyte-Driven Nanostructuring,” Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English) 58 (2019): 17047-17053.

[2] B. Zhang, J. Zhang, M. Hua, et al., “Highly Electrocatalytic Ethylene Production From CO₂ on Nanodefective Cu Nanosheets,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (2020): 13606-13613.

[3] Z. Tang, E. Nishiwaki, K. E. Fritz, T. Hanrath, and J. Suntivich, “Cu(I) Reducibility Controls Ethylene vs Ethanol Selectivity on (100)-Textured Copper during Pulsed CO2 Reduction,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13 (2021): 14050-14055.

[4] R. Kortlever, J. Shen, K. J. P. Schouten, F. Calle-Vallejo, and M. T. M. Koper, “Catalysts and Reaction Pathways for the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 6 (2015): 4073-4082.

[5] A. Loiudice, P. Lobaccaro, E. A. Kamali, et al., “Tailoring Copper Nanocrystals towards C₂ Products in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55 (2016): 5789-5792.

[6] P. Iyengar, M. J. Kolb, J. R. Pankhurst, F. Calle-Vallejo, and R. Buonsanti, “Elucidating the Facet-Dependent Selectivity for CO₂ Electroreduction to Ethanol of Cu-Ag Tandem Catalysts,” ACS Catalysis 11 (2021): 4456-4463.

[7] J. Kim, W. Choi, J. W. Park, C. Kim, M. Kim, and H. Song, “Branched Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Highly Selective Ethylene Production by Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (2019): 6986-6994.

[8] G. Shi, Y. Xie, L. Du, et al., “Constructing Cu−C Bonds in a Graphdiyne-Regulated Cu Single-Atom Electrocatalyst for CO₂ Reduction to CH₄,” Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English) 61 (2022): e202203569.

[9] H. Zou, G. Zhao, H. Dai, et al., “Electronic Perturbation of Copper Single-Atom CO₂ Reduction Catalysts in a Molecular Way,” Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English) 62 (2023): e202217220.

[10] Y. Xu, C. Li, Y. Xiao, et al., “Tuning the Selectivity of Liquid Products of CO₂RR by Cu-Ag Alloying,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14 (2022): 11567-11574.

[11] F. Chang, K. Zhu, C. Liu, et al., “Construction of Cu─Ni Atomic Pair With Bimetallic Atom-Cluster Sites for Enhanced CO₂ Electroreduction,” Advanced Functional Materials 34 (2024): 2400893.

[12] Y. Wang, Z. Wang, C.-T. Dinh, et al., “Catalyst Synthesis Under CO₂ Electroreduction Favours Faceting and Promotes Renewable Fuels Electrosynthesis,” Nature Catalysis 3 (2020): 98-106.

[13] F. Yang, A. Chen, P. L. Deng, et al., “Highly Efficient Electroconversion of Carbon Dioxide Into Hydrocarbons by Cathodized Copper-organic Frameworks,” Chemical Science 10 (2019): 7975-7981.

[14] J. Vavra, T.-H. Shen, D. Stoian, V. Tileli, and R. Buonsanti, “Real-Time Monitoring Reveals Dissolution/Redeposition Mechanism in Copper Nanocatalysts During the Initial Stages of the CO₂ Reduction Reaction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 1347-1354.

[15] P. Grosse, A. Yoon, C. Rettenmaier, A. Herzog, S. W. Chee, and B. R. Cuenya, “Dynamic Transformation of Cubic Copper Catalysts During CO₂ Electroreduction and Its Impact on Catalytic Selectivity,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 6736.

[16] Z. Han, D. Han, Z. Chen, et al., “Steering Surface Reconstruction of Copper With Electrolyte Additives for CO₂ Electroreduction,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 3158.

[17] J. Huang, N. Hörmann, E. Oveisi, et al., “Potential-induced Nanoclustering of Metallic Catalysts During Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 3117.

[18] J. Vavra, G. P. Ramona, F. Dattila, et al., “Solution-Based Cu+ Transient Species Mediate the Reconstruction of Copper Electrocatalysts for CO₂ Reduction,” Nature Catalysis 7 (2024): 89-97.

[19] S. Y. Lee, H. Jung, N.-K. Kim, H.-S. Oh, B. K. Min, and Y. J. Hwang, “Mixed Copper States in Anodized Cu Electrocatalyst for Stable and Selective Ethylene Production From CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140 (2018): 8681-8689.

[20] C. Xia, F.-M. Li, C. He, S. Zaman, W. Guo, and B. Y. Xia, “Structural Reconstruction of Electrocatalysts,” Fundamental Research (2024).

[21] H. Wu, H. Yu, Y. L. Chow, P. A. Webley, and J. Zhang, “Toward Durable CO₂ Electroreduction With Cu-Based Catalysts via Understanding Their Deactivation Modes,” Advanced Materials 36 (2024): 2403217.

[22] J. Chen and L. Wang, “Effects of the Catalyst Dynamic Changes and Influence of the Reaction Environment on the Performance of Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Advanced Materials 34 (2022): 2103900.

[23] C. Chen, X. Yan, Y. Wu, et al., “The in Situ Study of Surface Species and Structures of Oxide-Derived Copper Catalysts for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Chemical Science 12 (2021): 5938-5943.

[24] K. Rossi and R. Buonsanti, “Shaping Copper Nanocatalysts to Steer Selectivity in the Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Reaction,” Accounts of Chemical Research 55 (2022): 629-637.

[25] M. Munz, J. Poon, W. Frandsen, B. R. Cuenya, and C. S. Kley, “Nanoscale Electron Transfer Variations at Electrocatalyst-Electrolyte Interfaces Resolved by in Situ Conductive Atomic Force Microscopy,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 5242-5251.

[26] Y.-G. Kim, J. H. Baricuatro, A. Javier, J. M. Gregoire, and M. P. Soriaga, “The Evolution of the Polycrystalline Copper Surface, First to Cu(111) and Then to Cu(100), at a Fixed CO2RR Potential: A Study by Operando EC-STM,” Langmuir 30 (2014): 15053-15056.

[27] Z. Li, L. Wang, T. Wang, L. Sun, and W. Yang, “Steering the Dynamics of Reaction Intermediates and Catalyst Surface During Electrochemical Pulsed CO₂ Reduction for Enhanced C₂₊ Selectivity,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 20655-20664.

[28] D.-H. Nam, O. S. Bushuyev, J. Li, et al., “Metal-Organic Frameworks Mediate Cu Coordination for Selective CO₂ Electroreduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140 (2018): 11378-11386.

[29] H. Shi, L. Luo, C. Li, et al., “Stabilizing Cu⁺ Species in Cu₂ O/CuO Catalyst via Carbon Intermediate Confinement for Selective CO₂ RR,” Advanced Functional Materials 34 (2024): 2310913.

[30] Z. Ma, T. Wan, D. Zhang, et al., “Atomically Dispersed Cu Catalysts on Sulfide-Derived Defective Ag Nanowires for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” ACS Nano 17 (2023): 2387-2398.

[31] Z. Ma, C. Tsounis, C. Y. Toe, et al., “Reconstructing Cu Nanoparticle Supported on Vertical Graphene Surfaces via Electrochemical Treatment to Tune the Selectivity of CO₂ Reduction Toward Valuable Products,” ACS Catalysis 12 (2022): 4792-4805.

[32] X. Wang, A. Guo, Y. Wang, et al., “Br-doped Cu Nanoparticle Formed by in Situ Restructuring for Highly Efficient Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ to Formate,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 653 (2024): 238-245.

[33] W. Zhang, C. Huang, J. Zhu, et al., “Dynamic Restructuring of Coordinatively Unsaturated Copper Paddle Wheel Clusters to Boost Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction to Hydrocarbons**,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61 (2022): e202112116.

[34] W. Fang, R. Lu, F.-M. Li, et al., “Low-Coordination Nanocrystalline Copper-Based Catalysts Through Theory-Guided Electrochemical Restructuring for Selective CO₂ Reduction to Ethylene,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): e202319936.

[35] J. Vavra, G. P. L. Ramona, F. Dattila, et al., “Solution-based Cu⁺ Transient Species Mediate the Reconstruction of Copper Electrocatalysts for CO₂ Reduction,” Nature Catalysis 7 (2024): 89-97.

[36] W. Lai, Y. Qiao, Y. Wang, and H. Huang, “Stability Issues in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction: Recent Advances in Fundamental Understanding and Design Strategies,” Advanced Materials 35 (2023): 2306288.

[37] S. Seo, S. Jin, G. Wang, and B. Yoo, “The Effect of Copper Dissolution in Acidic Electrolyte on the Formation of Nanotwin in Pulse Electrodeposited Copper,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 161 (2014): D425-D428.

[38] P. K. Yadav, C. Kochar, L. Taneja, and S. S. Tripathy, “Study on Dissolution Behavior of CuO Nanoparticles in Various Synthetic media and Natural Aqueous Medium,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 24 (2022): 122.

[39] “Corrosion of Copper Alloys in KOH, NaOH, NaCl, and HCl Electrolyte Solutions and Its Impact to the Mechanical Properties,” Alexandria Engineering Journal 60 (2021): 2235-2243.

[40] F. D. Speck and S. Cherevko, “Electrochemical Copper Dissolution: A Benchmark for Stable CO₂ Reduction on Copper Electrocatalysts,” Electrochemistry Communications 115 (2020): 106739.

[41] D. Zhong, D. Cheng, Q. Fang, Y. Liu, J. Li, and Q. Zhao, “Understanding the Restructuring and Degradation of Oxide-derived Copper During Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Chemical Engineering Journal 470 (2023): 143907.

[42] P. De Luna, R. Quintero-Bermudez, C.-T. Dinh, et al., “Catalyst Electro-redeposition Controls Morphology and Oxidation state for Selective Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” Nature Catalysis 1 (2018): 103-110.

[43] H. Jung, S. Y. Lee, C. W. Lee, et al., “Electrochemical Fragmentation of Cu₂O Nanoparticles Enhancing Selective C-C Coupling From CO₂ Reduction Reaction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (2019): 4624-4633.

[44] Q. Liu, Q. Jiang, L. Li, and W. Yang, “Spontaneous Reconstruction of Copper Active Sites During the Alkaline CORR: Degradation and Recovery of the Performance,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 4242-4251.

[45] A. Yoon, J. Poon, P. Grosse, S. W. Chee, and B. R. Cuenya, “Iodide-mediated Cu Catalyst Restructuring During CO₂ Electroreduction,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials 10 (2022): 14041-14050.

[46] D. K. Pattadar and F. P. Zamborini, “Effect of Size, Coverage, and Dispersity on the Potential-Controlled Ostwald Ripening of Metal Nanoparticles,” Langmuir 35 (2019): 16416-16426.

[47] J. Huang, N. Hormann, E. Oveisi, et al., “Potential-induced Nanoclustering of Metallic Catalysts During Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 3117.

[48] P. C. Chen, C. Chen, Y. Yang, et al., “Chemical and Structural Evolution of AgCu Catalysts in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 10116-10125.

[49] B. Chen, Z. Zhang, S. Kim, et al., “Ostwald Ripening Driven Exfoliation to Ultrathin Layered Double Hydroxides Nanosheets for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10 (2018): 44518-44526.

[50] K. K. Nanda, A. Maisels, F. E. Kruis, H. Fissan, and S. Stappert, “Higher Surface Energy of Free Nanoparticles,” Physical Review Letter 91 (2003): 106102.

[51] M. N. Hossain, L. Zhang, R. Neagu, and E. Rassachack, “Free-Standing Single-Atom Catalyst-Based Electrodes for CO₂ Reduction,” Electrochemical Energy Reviews 7 (2024): 1-45.

[52] J.-Y. Kim, H. S. Ahn, I. Kim, et al., “Selective Hydrocarbon or Oxygenate Production in CO₂ Electroreduction Over Metallurgical Alloy Catalysts,” Nature Synthesis 3 (2024): 452-465.

[53] K. Fan, L. Zong, J. Liu, et al., “In Situ Reconstruction to Surface Sulfide Adsorbed Metal Scaffold for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Activity,” Advanced Energy Materials 14 (2024): 2400052.

[54] L. Su, X. Cui, T. He, et al., “Surface Reconstruction of Cobalt Phosphide Nanosheets by Electrochemical Activation for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution in Alkaline Solution†”, Chemical Science 10 (2019): 2019-2024.

[55] H. Jiang, Q. He, X. Li, et al., “Tracking Structural Self-Reconstruction and Identifying True Active Sites Toward Cobalt Oxychloride Precatalyst of Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Advanced Materials 31 (2019): 1805127.

[56] E. W. Lees, B. A. Mowbray, F. G. Parlane, and C. P. Berlinguette, “Gas Diffusion Electrodes and Membranes for CO₂ Reduction Electrolysers,” Nature Reviews Materials 7 (2022): 55-64.

[57] W. Ma, X. He, W. Wang, S. Xie, Q. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO₂ and CO to Multi-carbon Compounds Over Cu-based Catalysts,” Chemical Society Reviews 50 (2021): 12897-12914.

[58] Y. Kim, S. Park, S.-J. Shin, et al., “Time-Resolved Observation of C-C Coupling Intermediates on Cu Electrodes for Selective Electrochemical CO2 Reduction,” Energy & Environmental Science 13 (2020): 4301-4311.

[59] F. Li, Y. C. Li, Z. Wang, et al., “Cooperative CO₂-to-Ethanol Conversion via Enriched Intermediates at Molecule-Metal Catalyst Interfaces,” Nature Catalysis 3 (2020): 75-82.

[60] B. Eren, D. Zherebetskyy, L. L. Patera, et al., “Activation of Cu(111) Surface by Decomposition Into Nanoclusters Driven by CO Adsorption,” Science 351 (2016): 475-478.

[61] B. Eren, D. Zherebetskyy, Y. Hao, et al., “One-Dimensional Nanoclustering of the Cu (100) Surface Under CO Gas in the Mbar Pressure Range,” Surface Science 651 (2016): 210-214.

[62] R. Amirbeigiarab, J. Tian, A. Herzog, et al., “Atomic-scale Surface Restructuring of Copper Electrodes Under CO₂ Electroreduction Conditions,” Nature Catalysis 6 (2023): 837-846.

[63] S. Popovic, M. Bele, and N. Hodnik, “Reconstruction of Copper Nanoparticles at Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Reaction Conditions Occurs via Two-Step Dissolution/Redeposition Mechanism,” ChemElectroChem 8 (2021): 2634-2639.

[64] W. Ni, Z. Yixiang, Y. Yao, et al., “Surface Reconstruction with a Sandwich-like C/Cu/C Catalyst for Selective and Stable CO₂ Electroreduction,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14 (2022): 13261.

[65] M. C. O. Monteiro, F. Dattila, N. López, and M. T. M. Koper, “The Role of Cation Acidity on the Competition Between Hydrogen Evolution and CO₂ Reduction on Gold Electrodes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144 (2022): 1589-1602.

[66] H.-G. Qin, F.-Z. Li, Y.-F. Du, et al., “Quantitative Understanding of Cation Effects on the Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ and H⁺ in Acidic Solution,” ACS Catalysis 13 (2023): 916-926.

[67] B. Pan, Y. Wang, and Y. Li, “Understanding and Leveraging the Effect of Cations in the Electrical Double Layer for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Chem Catalysis 2 (2022): 1267-1276.

[68] C.-T. Dinh, T. Burdyny, M. G. Kibria, et al., “CO₂ Electroreduction to Ethylene via Hydroxide-mediated Copper Catalysis at an Abrupt Interface,” Science 360 (2018): 783-787.

[69] J. A. Gauthier, Z. Lin, M. Head-Gordon, and A. T. Bell, “Pathways for the Formation of C₂₊ Products Under Alkaline Conditions During the Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂,” ACS Energy Letters 7 (2022): 1679-1686.

[70] C. Zhong, Y. Deng, W. Hu, J. Qiao, L. Zhang, and J. Zhang, “A Review of Electrolyte Materials and Compositions for Electrochemical Supercapacitors,” Chemical Society Reviews 44 (2015): 7484-7539.

[71] W. X. Wu, L. P. Xu, Q. Lu, et al., “Addressing the Carbonate Issue: Electrocatalysts for Acidic CO₂ Reduction Reaction,” Advanced Materials 33 (2024).

[72] N. Wang, K. Yao, A. Vomiero, Y. Wang, and H. Liang, “Inhibiting Carbonate Formation Using CO₂ -CO-C₂₊ Tandems,” SmartMat 2 (2021): 423-425.

[73] A. Perazio, C. E. Creissen, J. G. Rivera de la Cruz, M. W. Schreiber, and M. Fontecave, “Acidic Electroreduction of CO₂ to Multi-Carbon Products With CO₂ Recovery and Recycling From Carbonate,” ACS Energy Letters 8 (2023): 2979-2985.

[74] F. Bernasconi, N. Plainpan, M. Mirolo, et al., “Operando Observation of (Bi)Carbonate Precipitation During Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction in Strongly Acidic Electrolytes,” ACS Catalysis 14 (2024): 8232-8237.

[75] M. Zeng, W. Fang, Y. Cen, X. Zhang, Y. Hu, and B. Y. Xia, “Reaction Environment Regulation for Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction in Acids,” Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English) 63 (2024): e202404574.

[76] M. Sassenburg, M. Kelly, S. Subramanian, W. A. Smith, and T. Burdyny, “Zero-Gap Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Cells: Challenges and Operational Strategies for Prevention of Salt Precipitation,” ACS Energy Letters 8 (2023): 321-331.

[77] Y. Xu, J. P. Edwards, S. Liu, et al., “Self-Cleaning CO₂ Reduction Systems: Unsteady Electrochemical Forcing Enables Stability,” ACS Energy Letters 6 (2021): 809-815.

[78] Z.-Q. Liang, T.-T. Zhuang, A. Seifitokaldani, et al., “Copper-on-Nitride Enhances the Stable Electrosynthesis of Multi-Carbon Products From CO₂,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 3828.

[79] D. Cheng, Z.-J. Zhao, G. Zhang, et al., “The Nature of Active Sites for Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction Over Oxide-Derived Copper Catalysts,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 395.

[80] T. Shinagawa, G. O. Larrazábal, A. J. Martín, F. Krumeich, and J. Pérez-Ramírez, “Sulfur-Modified Copper Catalysts for the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate,” ACS Catalysis 8 (2018): 837-844.

[81] P. Grosse, D. Gao, F. Scholten, I. Sinev, H. Mistry, and B. Roldan Cuenya, “Dynamic Changes in the Structure, Chemical State and Catalytic Selectivity of Cu Nanocubes During CO₂ Electroreduction: Size and Support Effects,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 57 (2018): 6192-6197.

[82] Y. Xu, F. Li, A. Xu, et al., “Low Coordination Number Copper Catalysts for Electrochemical CO₂ Methanation in a Membrane Electrode Assembly,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 2932.

[83] L. Zhang, X. Yang, Q. Yuan, et al., “Elucidating the Structure-Stability Relationship of Cu Single-Atom Catalysts Using Operando Surface-Enhanced Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 8311.

[84] P.-C. Chen, C. Chen, Y. Yang, et al., “Chemical and Structural Evolution of AgCu Catalysts in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 10116-10125.

[85] C. Rettenmaier, A. Herzog, D. Casari, et al., “Operando Insights Into Correlating CO Coverage and Cu-Au Alloying With the Selectivity of Au NP-decorated Cu₂O Nanocubes During the Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction,” EES Catalysis 2 (2024): 311-323.

[86] G. H. Simon, C. S. Kley, and B. Roldan Cuenya, “Potential-Dependent Morphology of Copper Catalysts during CO₂ Electroreduction Revealed by In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60 (2021): 2561-2568.

[87] Y. Li, F. Cui, M. B. Ross, D. Kim, Y. Sun, and P. Yang, “Structure-Sensitive CO₂ Electroreduction to Hydrocarbons on Ultrathin 5-Fold Twinned Copper Nanowires,” Nano Letters 17 (2017): 1312-1317.

[88] S. J. Raaijman, N. Arulmozhi, and M. T. M. Koper, “Morphological Stability of Copper Surfaces under Reducing Conditions,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13 (2021): 48730-48744.

[89] Z. Xie, Q. Wang, H. Yang, et al., “Surface Facets Reconstruction in Copper-Based Materials for Enhanced Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Small 20 (2024): 2401530.

[90] C. Choi, S. Kwon, T. Cheng, et al., “Highly Active and Stable Stepped Cu Surface for Enhanced Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction to C₂H₄,” Nature Catalysis 3 (2020): 804-812.

[91] T.-T. Zhuang, Z.-Q. Liang, A. Seifitokaldani, et al., “Steering Post-C-C Coupling Selectivity Enables High Efficiency Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Multi-carbon Alcohols,” Nature Catalysis 1 (2018): 421-428.

[92] H.-Y. Wang, M. Soldemo, D. Degerman, et al., “Direct Evidence of Subsurface Oxygen Formation in Oxide-Derived Cu by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61 (2022): e202111021.

[93] A. Eilert, F. Cavalca, F. S. Roberts, et al., “Subsurface Oxygen in Oxide-Derived Copper Electrocatalysts for Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8 (2017): 285-290.

[94] W. Wang, Z. Ma, X. Fei, et al., “Joint Tuning the Morphology and Oxygen Vacancy of Cu₂O by Ionic Liquid Enables High-Efficient CO₂ Reduction to C₂ Products,” Chemical Engineering Journal 436 (2022): 135029.

[95] M. Favaro, H. Xiao, T. Cheng, W. A. Goddard, J. Yano, and E. J. Crumlin, “Subsurface Oxide Plays a Critical Role in CO₂ Activation by Cu(111) Surfaces to Form Chemisorbed CO₂, the First Step in Reduction of CO₂,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (2017): 6706-6711.

[96] C. Peng, G. Luo, J. Zhang, et al., “Double Sulfur Vacancies by Lithium Tuning Enhance CO₂ Electroreduction to n-Propanol,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 1580.

[97] C. Peng, G. Luo, Z. Xu, et al., “Lithiation-Enabled High-Density Nitrogen Vacancies Electrocatalyze CO₂ to C₂ Products,” Advanced Materials 33 (2021): 2103150.

[98] R. Sun, C. Wei, Z. Huang, et al., “Cu₂₊₁O/CuO_x Heterostructures Promote the Electrosynthesis of C₂₊ Products From CO₂,” Nano Research 16 (2023): 4698-4705.

[99] B. Qiao, A. Wang, X. Yang, et al., “Single-Atom Catalysis of CO Oxidation Using Pt₁/FeO_x,” Nature Chemistry 3 (2011): 634-641.

[100] H. Choi, M. G. Ha, J. Suh, et al., “Effect of the Nitrogen/Carbon Ratio in the Organic Ligand of a Nickel Single-Atom Catalyst on Its Electrochemical Activity in CO₂ Reduction,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 355 (2024): 124192.

[101] Z. Zhang, C. Feng, C. Liu, et al., “Electrochemical Deposition as a Universal Route for Fabricating Single-atom Catalysts,” Nature Communications 11 (2020): 1215.

[102] W. Zhong, Z. Wang, S. Han, et al., “Identifying the Active Sites of a Single Atom Catalyst With pH-Universal Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activity,” Cell Reports Physical Science 1 (2020): 100115.

[103] L. Yan, X.-D. Liang, Y. Sun, et al., “Evolution of Cu Single Atom Catalysts to Nanoclusters During CO₂ Reduction to CO,” Chemical Communications 58 (2022): 2488-2491.

[104] C. E. Creissen and M. Fontecave, “Keeping Sight of Copper in Single-atom Catalysts for Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 2280.

[105] L. G. Verga, P. C. D. Mendes, V. K. Ocampo-Restrepo, and J. L. F. Da Silva, “Exploring the Adsorption Site Coordination as a Strategy to Tune Copper Catalysts for CO2 Electro-Reduction,” Catalysis Science & Technology 12 (2022): 869-879.

[106] R. Reske, H. Mistry, F. Behafarid, B. Roldan Cuenya, and P. Strasser, “Particle Size Effects in the Catalytic Electroreduction of CO₂ on Cu Nanoparticles,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 136 (2014): 6978-6986.

[107] X. Zhang, J.-X. Liu, B. Zijlstra, et al., “Optimum Cu Nanoparticle Catalysts for CO₂ Hydrogenation towards Methanol,” Nano Energy 43 (2018): 200-209.

[108] K. Liu, M. Ma, L. Wu, et al., “Electronic Effects Determine the Selectivity of Planar Au-Cu Bimetallic Thin Films for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 11 (2019): 16546-16555.

[109] S. Nag, K. C. Mahdak, A. Devaraj, S. Gohil, P. Ayyub, and R. Banerjee, “Phase Separation in Immiscible Silver-Copper Alloy Thin Films,” Journal of Materials Science 44 (2009): 3393-3401.

[110] Y. Yang, S. Louisia, S. Yu, et al., “Operando Studies Reveal Active Cu Nanograins for CO₂ Electroreduction,” Nature 614 (2023): 262-269.

[111] S.-C. Lin, C.-C. Chang, S.-Y. Chiu, et al., “Operando Time-Resolved X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy Reveals the Chemical Nature Enabling Highly Selective CO₂ Reduction,” Nature Communications 11 (2020): 3525.

[112] X. Ren, J. Zhao, X. Li, et al., “In-situ Spectroscopic Probe of the Intrinsic Structure Feature of Single-atom Center in Electrochemical CO/CO₂ Reduction to Methanol,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 3401.

[113] N. Han, Y. Wang, H. Yang, et al., “Ultrathin Bismuth Nanosheets From in Situ Topotactic Transformation for Selective Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction to Formate,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 1320.

[114] W. Sheng, S. Kattel, S. Yao, et al., “Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ to Synthesis Gas With Controlled CO/H₂ Ratios,” Energy & Environmental Science 10 (2017): 1180-1185.

[115] X. Su, Z. Jiang, J. Zhou, et al., “Complementary Operando Spectroscopy Identification of in-situ Generated Metastable Charge-Asymmetry Cu2-CuN₃ Clusters for CO₂ Reduction to Ethanol,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 1322.

[116] X. Tan, K. Sun, Z. Zhuang, et al., “Stabilizing Copper by a Reconstruction-Resistant Atomic Cu-O-Si Interface for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 8656-8664.

[117] V. Okatenko, A. Loiudice, M. A. Newton, et al., “Alloying as a Strategy to Boost the Stability of Copper Nanocatalysts During the Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Reaction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 5370-5383.

[118] P. P. Albertini, M. A. Newton, M. Wang, et al., “Hybrid Oxide Coatings Generate Stable Cu Catalysts for CO₂ Electroreduction,” Nature Materials 23 (2024): 680-687.

[119] J. Y. Kim, D. Hong, J. C. Lee, et al., “Quasi-graphitic Carbon Shell-Induced Cu Confinement Promotes Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Toward C₂₊ Products,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 3765.

[120] J. Timoshenko, A. Bergmann, C. Rettenmaier, et al., “Steering the Structure and Selectivity of CO₂ Electroreduction Catalysts by Potential Pulses,” Nature Catalysis 5 (2022): 259-267.

[121] T. Dou, J. He, S. Diao, et al., “Dynamic Reconstructuring of CuS/SnO₂-S for Promoting CO₂ Electroreduction to Formate,” Journal of Energy Chemistry 82 (2023): 497-506.

[122] J. E. Huang, F. Li, A. Ozden, et al., “CO₂ Electrolysis to Multicarbon Products in Strong Acid,” Science 372 (2021): 1074-1078.

[123] T. Lee, Y. Lee, J. Eo, and D.-H. Nam, “Acidic CO₂ Electroreduction for High CO₂ Utilization: Catalysts, Electrodes, and Electrolyzers,” Nanoscale 16 (2024): 2235-2249.

[124] A. Ozden, F. P. García de Arquer, J. E. Huang, et al., “Carbon-Efficient Carbon Dioxide Electrolysers,” Nature Sustainability 5 (2022): 563-573.

[125] Q. Hao, D.-X. Liu, H.-X. Zhong, Q. Tang, and J.-M. Yan, “Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction in Acidic Medium,” Chem Catalysis 3 (2023): 100542.

[126] B. E. A. Rani and B. B. J. Basu, “Green Inhibitors for Corrosion Protection of Metals and Alloys: An Overview,” International Journal of Corrosion 2012 (2012): 1-15.

[127] M. Goyal, S. Kumar, I. Bahadur, C. Verma, and E. E. Ebenso, “Organic Corrosion Inhibitors for Industrial Cleaning of Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Metals in Acidic Solutions: A Review,” Journal of Molecular Liquids 256 (2018): 565-573.

[128] B. E. Ibrahimi, J. V. Nardeli, and L. Guo Sustainable Corrosion Inhibitors I: Fundamentals, Methodologies, and Industrial Applications (ACS Publications, 2021), 1-19.

[129] E. McCafferty, Introduction to Corrosion Science (Springer, 2010).

[130] D. Bae, T. Lee, W. Kwon, S.-H. Oh, and D.-H. Nam, “Porous Cu/C Nanofibers Promote Electrochemical CO₂ -to-Ethylene Conversion via High CO₂ Availability,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 12 (2024): 17295-17305.

[131] C. Kim, J. C. Bui, X. Luo, et al., “Tailored Catalyst Microenvironments for CO₂ Electroreduction to Multicarbon Products on Copper Using Bilayer Ionomer Coatings,” Nature Energy 6 (2021): 1026-1034.

[132] R. D. Kent and P. J. Vikesland, “Dissolution and Persistence of Copper-Based Nanomaterials in Undersaturated Solutions with Respect to Cupric Solid Phases,” Environmental Science & Technology 50 (2016): 6772-6781.

[133] C. Long, X. Liu, K. Wan, et al., “Regulating Reconstruction of Oxide-Derived Cu for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Toward n-Propanol,” Science Advances 9 (2023): eadi6119.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Exploration published by Henan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.