Multilayer Casting Strategy for Enhanced Cation Contamination Resistance in Proton Exchange Membranes

Abstract

The proton exchange membrane (PEM) is critical for the operation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). However, cationic impurities (e.g., Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺) in water or the environment readily bind to the PEM's sulfonic acid groups (−SO₃H), deactivating sites and reducing proton conductivity. This necessitates costly and high-precision water treatment. Conventional solutions, such as adding perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) chains or anti-hardness additives often raise costs and lower intrinsic conductivity. To address this issue, we developed a novel multilayer casting technique. This method used airborne moisture to drive −SO₃H group migration toward surfaces while simultaneously densifying fluorocarbon chains into a robust network. Repeated casting cycles created an internal multilayered barrier network within the PEM. This structure generated effective steric hindrance, physically blocking cation diffusion and significantly boosting hard water resistance. Performance tests demonstrated that after 4 h of heated immersion in 220 ppm hard water, the proton conductivity (8.0 S/m) maintained a value of 294%, which was higher than that of N117. The technique also established a gradient distribution of hydrophilic domains across the membrane. This optimized proton transport pathways enabling the MLM to achieve proton conductivity comparable to commercial Nafion membranes under standard conditions. This provided a path to more durable and cost-effective PEMFCs.

Keywords

cations contaminations / multilayer casting / multilayer interface / polymer electrolyte membranes / steric hindrance

References

[1] A. T. Dale, A. F. Pereira de Lucena, J. Marriott, B. S. Moreira Cesar Borba, R. Schaeffer, and M. M. Bilec, “Modeling Future Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Environmental Impacts of Electricity Supplies in Brazil,” Energies6, no. 7 (2013): 3182-3208, https://doi.org/10.3390/en6073182.

[2] Y. Dong, C. Feng, H. Xie, et al., “A Composite Proton Exchange Membrane With a Three-Dimensionally-Reinforced Hydrogen Bonding Network for Durable Hydrogen Fuel Cells,” Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers11, no. 14 (2024): 4459-4468, https://doi.org/10.1039/d4qi01074d.

[3] R. Kommalapati, A. Kadiyala, M. T. Shahriar, and Z. Huque, “Review of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Different Photovoltaic and Concentrating Solar Power Electricity Generation Systems,” Energies10, no. 3 (2017): 350, https://doi.org/10.3390/en10030350.

[4] Z. P. Cano, D. Banham, S. Ye, et al., “Batteries and Fuel Cells for Emerging Electric Vehicle Markets,” Nature Energy3, no. 4 (2018): 279-289, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1.

[5] A. Katzenberg, A. Chowdhury, M. Fang, et al., “Highly Permeable Perfluorinated Sulfonic Acid Ionomers for Improved Electrochemical Devices: Insights Into Structure-Property Relationships,” Journal of the American Chemical Society142, no. 8 (2020): 3742-3752, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b09170.

[6] J. Song, O. H. Han, and S. Han, “Nanometer-Scale Water- and Proton-Diffusion Heterogeneities Across Water Channels in Polymer Electrolyte Membranes,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English54, no. 12 (2015): 3615-3620, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201408318.

[7] P. Zuo, Y. Li, A. Wang, et al., “Sulfonated Microporous Polymer Membranes With Fast and Selective Ion Transport for Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English59, no. 24 (2020): 9564-9573, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202000012.

[8] X. O. Jie, Z. G. Shao, and B. O. L. Yi, “The Effect of Different Valency Cations on DMFC Performance,” Electrochemistry Communications12, no. 5 (2010): 700-702, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.03.010.

[9] T. Okada, “Theory for Water Management in Membranes for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells—Part 1. the Effect of Impurity Ions at the Anode Side on the Membrane Performances,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry465, no. 1 (1999): 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0728(99)00065-0.

[10] H. Becker, J. Murawski, D. V. Shinde, I. E. L. Stephens, G. Hinds, and G. Smith, “Impact of Impurities on Water Electrolysis: A Review,” Sustainable Energy Fuels7, no. 7 (2023): 1565-1603, https://doi.org/10.1039/d2se01517j.

[11] N. Li, S. S. Araya, X. Cui, and S. K. Kær, “The Effects of Cationic Impurities on the Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzer,” Journal of Power Sources473 (2020): 228617, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228617.

[12] G. A. Lindquist, Q. Xu, S. Z. Oener, and S. W. Boettcher, “Membrane Electrolyzers for Impure-Water Splitting,” Joule4, no. 12 (2020): 2549-2561, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.020.

[13] R. Yoshimura, S. Wai, Y. Ota, K. Nishioka, and Y. Suzuki, “Effects of Artificial River Water on PEM Water Electrolysis Performance,” Catalysts12, no. 9 (2022): 934, https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12090934.

[14] S. J. Peighambardoust, S. Rowshanzamir, and M. Amjadi, “Review of the Proton Exchange Membranes for Fuel Cell Applications,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy35, no. 17 (2010): 9349-9384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.017.

[15] A. Mokrini, N. Raymond, K. Theberge, et al., “Properties of Melt-Extruded Vs. Solution-Cast Proton Exchange Membranes Based on PFSA Nanocomposites,” ECS Transactions33, no. 1 (2010): 855-865, https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3484579.

[16] S. Siracusano, C. Oldani, M. A. Navarra, et al., “Chemically Stabilised Extruded and Recast Short Side Chain Aquivion Proton Exchange Membranes for High Current Density Operation in Water Electrolysis,” Journal of Membrane Science578 (2019): 136-148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.02.021.

[17] M. T. Taghizadeh and M. Vatanparast, “Ultrasonic-Assisted Synthesis of ZrO₂ Nanoparticles and Their Application to Improve the Chemical Stability of Nafion Membrane in Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cells,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science483 (2016): 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.08.014.

[18] C. Korzeniewski, D. E. Snow, and R. Basnayake, “Transmission Infrared Spectroscopy as a Probe of Nafion Film Structure: Analysis of Spectral Regions Fundamental to Understanding Hydration Effects,” Applied Spectroscopy60, no. 6 (2006): 599-604, https://doi.org/10.1366/000370206777670620.

[19] T. Agarwal, A. K. Prasad, S. G. Advani, S. K. Babu, and R. L. Borup, “Infrared Spectroscopy for Understanding the Structure of Nafion and Its Associated Properties,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A12, no. 24 (2024): 14229-14244, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ta05653h.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Electron published by Harbin Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.