Seismic vulnerability assessment of a railway beam bridge considering brittle failure of the restrainer in a friction pendulum system

Quanchuang Yuan , Weitao Yin , Kailai Deng , Hao Lu , Lin Pang , Xingchen Chen

Earthquake Engineering and Resilience ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 432 -446.

PDF
Earthquake Engineering and Resilience ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 432 -446. DOI: 10.1002/eer2.91
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Seismic vulnerability assessment of a railway beam bridge considering brittle failure of the restrainer in a friction pendulum system

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The restrainers in the friction pendulum system (FPS) may experience brittle failure during an earthquake. Strong nonlinear behavior should be considered to precisely assess the seismic performance of the railway beam bridge under an earthquake. A seismic vulnerability assessment was performed based on a typical simply supported railway beam bridge. Three different models of the FPS in fixed direction were considered: elastic restrainer model, brittle restrainer model, and nonrestrainer model. Through dynamic analysis, the responses of the railway beam bridge were obtained, including the force and displacement of the FPSs, the curvature ductility at the pier bottom, and transverse dislocation at the beam gap. The analysis results pointed out when the earthquake intensity exceeded the fundamental intensity, the brittle failure of the restrainers was very likely to happen. The sudden release of energy introduced a displacement pulse to the FPS. The elastic restrainer model overestimated the force demand and damage probability of the substructures but underestimated the FPS displacement and dislocation at the beam gap. The nonrestrainer model seriously under-estimated the force demand of the substructure and the FPS displacement under strong earthquakes. The brittle restrainer model could reflect the nonuniform failure of the restrainers and provide a more accurate estimate of the transverse dislocation at the beam gap.

Keywords

dislocation / fragility analysis / friction pendulum system / railway bridge / restrainer failure / seismic vulnerability analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Quanchuang Yuan, Weitao Yin, Kailai Deng, Hao Lu, Lin Pang, Xingchen Chen. Seismic vulnerability assessment of a railway beam bridge considering brittle failure of the restrainer in a friction pendulum system. Earthquake Engineering and Resilience, 2024, 3(3): 432-446 DOI:10.1002/eer2.91

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Guo W, Wang Y, Ge CY, et al. Seismic failure features of multi-span simply supported girder bridges of high-speed railway under near-fault earthquake. J Vib Shock. 2020;39:210-218. (In Chinese)

[2]

Wei B, Wan K, Wang W, et al. Seismic isolation effect of a new type of friction pendulum bearing in high-speed railway girder bridge. Structures. 2023;51:776-790.

[3]

Feng L, Wang L, Fan YY, et al. Research on seismic isolation schemes of high-speed railway continuous girder bridge based on life cycle cost. Adv Eng Sci. 2020;52(5):161-169.

[4]

Feng D, Li A, Guo T. Seismic control of a single-tower extradosed railway bridge using the E-shaped steel damping bearing. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020;136:106249.

[5]

Liu C, Gao R, Guo B. Seismic design method analyses of an innovative steel damping bearing for railway bridges. Eng Struct. 2018;167:518-532.

[6]

JT/T 852-2013 Friction pendulum seismic isolation bearing for highway bridges. Traffic. 2013. (In Chinese)

[7]

Liao M, Wu B, Zeng X, Deng K. Incremental dynamic analysis of the long-span continuous beam bridge considering the fluctuating frictional force of rubber bearing. Adv Bridge Eng. 2021;2:19.

[8]

Dong J, Chen K, Zeng Y, et al. Study on vibration mitigation property of railway 32m prestressed concrete simply-supported gierder with friction pendulum bearings in highly seismic area. Railw Stand Des. 2020;64:63-68. (In Chinese)

[9]

Zhan YL, Zhang L, Zhang Q, et al. Study on the seismic responses for isolated bridge of friction pendulum bearing considering shear stud effect. J Railw Sci Eng. 2018;15(8):1996-2005. (In Chinese)

[10]

Jie M. The results of the on-site investigation of the 6.9-magnitude earthquake in Menyuan, Qinghai Province were released. 2022. (In Chinese). http://www.stdaily.com/index/kejixinwen/202201/8b2a970831014fb4b6e9573276661278.shtml

[11]

Matsumoto T, Kawashima K, Watanabe G. Seismic response of 3-span bridge considering the effect of failure of bearings. Proc Struct Eng A. 2007;53:503-512.

[12]

Wang C, Pei HT. Effect of shear-key on seismic response of isolated bridge. Earthq Resistant Eng Retrofitting. 2024;46(1):77-82. (In Chinese)

[13]

Xia XS, Chen XC, Wang XH, et al. Effect of shear key on seismic responses of bridge using isolation bearing. Earthq Eng Eng Dynam. 2012;32(6):104-109. (In Chinese)

[14]

Zhan YL, Zhang L, Zhang Q, et al. Effects of parameters of friction pendulum bearings on seismic response of seismically isolated bridge. Bridge Construction. 2018;48(3):45-49. (In Chinese)

[15]

Ye LP, Lu XZ, Ma QL, et al. Influence of post-yielding stiffness to seismic response of building structures. J Build Struct. 2009;30(2):17-29. (In Chinese)

[16]

Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng. 1988;114(8):1804-1826.

[17]

Zeng X, Zhu S, Deng K, et al. Study on hysteretic behavior of UHPC-NSC composite pier and optimization design of composite section. Eng Mech. 2023. (In Chinese)

[18]

Zeng X, Zhu S, Deng K, Zhao C, Yuan X, Wang C. Study of cyclic performance and design method of UHPC-NSC composite pier. J Struct Eng. 2024;150(3):04024007.

[19]

Nielson BG. Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones. Georgia Institute of Technology;2005:217.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Tianjin University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

219

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/