Development of an Inventory Modelling Framework for Seismic Risk Assessment of Residential Buildings in Eastern Canada

Abstract

Seismic risk assessment for residential buildings is a priority in Eastern Canada, given its densely populated cities and history of earthquake activity. A crucial component of this assessment is the development of an accurate and practical inventory model, which relies on comprehensive investigations and the collection of reliable data on residential buildings. A simple yet reliable inventory framework is essential to streamline the process of building inventory while reducing costs and time. Moreover, there is a need for more refined and standardized classifications of the structural systems of residential buildings. This study proposes a new inventory modelling framework for residential buildings, applied to Montreal as a case study, with a focus on the number of residential units. The two main objectives of this study are: (1) to conduct a historical review of residential construction practices in the city, defining common materials and structural systems; and (2) to determine their distribution across administrative areas, including both independent municipalities and boroughs within the City of Montreal. To achieve these objectives, previous studies and various pertinent resources were evaluated to trace the evolution of residential construction, and two open-access databases were employed and integrated to derive results. The analysis covers over 900,000 residential units, revealing that approximately 30% and 22% are associated with buildings constructed using wood light frames and concrete shear walls, respectively, while 48% correspond to buildings with mixed wood-masonry structural systems as well as masonry buildings. This inventory model offers practical insights into the distribution of residential units by structural systems, improving future simulations to estimate uninhabitable unit rates, population displacement, and shelter needs, which will support and strengthen community resilience.

Keywords

building classification / building inventory / inventory framework / Montreal / seismic risk assessment

References

[1] M. Lamontagne, “An Overview of Some Significant Eastern Canadian Earthquakes and Their Impacts on the Geological Environment, Buildings and the Public,” Natural Hazards 26, no. 1 (2002): 55-68, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015268710302.

[2] R. Fathi-Fazl, Z. Cai, L. Cortés-Puentes, E. Jacques, and B. Kadhom, Level 2: Semi-Quantitative Seismic Risk Screening Tool (SQST) for Existing Buildings. Part 2: Supporting Technical Documentation (National Research Council of Canada, 2020).

[3] Natural Resources Canada, Earthquake Zones in Eastern Canada, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.seismescanada.rncan.gc.ca/zones/eastcan-en.php#WQSZ.

[4] T. Lessault, A. Abo, E. Ezz, and M. J. Nollet, “Earthquake Scenarios for Seismic Performance Assessment of Essential Facilities: Case Study of Fire Stations in Montreal,” GeoHazards 6, no. 2 (2025): 22, https://doi.org/10.3390/GEOHAZARDS6020022.

[5] NRCC, National Building Code of Canada, Associate Committee on the National Building Code (National Research Council of Canada, 2020).

[6] R. Fathi-Fazl, Z. Cai, L. Cortés-Puentes, E. Jacques, and B. Kadhom, Level 2: Semi-Quantitative Seismic Risk Screening Tool (SQST) for Existing Buildings. Part 1: User's Guide (2020).

[7] H. Ghofrani, G. M. Atkinson, L. Chouinard, P. Rosset, and K. F. Tiampo, “Scenario Shakemaps for Montreal,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 42, no. 7 (2015): 463-476, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2014-0496.

[8] Property Assessment Units, City of Montreal (Open data), April 25 (2023), accessed July 17, 2023, https://donnees.montreal.ca/dataset/unites-evaluation-fonciere.

[9] M. Ozturk, M. H. Arslan, and H. H. Korkmaz, “Effect on RC Buildings of 6 February 2023 Turkey Earthquake Doublets and New Doctrines for Seismic Design,” Engineering Failure Analysis 153 (2023): 107521, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2023.107521.

[10] E. Işık, F. Avcil, M. Hadzima-Nyarko, et al., “Seismic Performance and Failure Mechanisms of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subject to the Earthquakes in Türkiye,” Sustainability 16, no. 15 (2024): 6473, https://doi.org/10.3390/SU16156473.

[11] J. Yuzbasi, “Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment: Field Observations and Recent Developments With Recommendations From the Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes in Türkiye on February 6th, 2023 (Pazarcık M7.8 and Elbistan M7.6),” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Published online June 17 (2024): 1-26, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2024.2353864.

[12] B. Atmaca, A. C. Altunişik, E. Ertürk Atmaca, et al., “What Is the Reason for Collapses on February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: Insights From a Dataset of 400 Collapsed RC Buildings Post-Earthquake Analysis,” Journal of Building Engineering 107 (2025): 112660, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2025.112660.

[13] A. Coburn and R. Spence, Earthquake Protection, 2nd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, 2002).

[14] M. F. Işık, E. Işık, and M. A. Bülbül, “Application of iOS/Android Based Assessment and Monitoring System for Building Inventory Under Seismic Impact,” Gradjevinar 70, no. 12 (2018): 1043-1056, https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1522.2015.

[15] E. Işık, M. Hadzima-Nyarko, D. Radu, and B. Bulajić, “Study on Effectiveness of Regional Risk Prioritisation in Reinforced Concrete Structures After Earthquakes,” Applied Sciences 14, no. 16 (2024): 6992, https://doi.org/10.3390/APP14166992.

[16] E. Işık, M. Hadzima-Nyarko, F. Avcil, et al., “Comparison of Seismic and Structural Parameters of Settlements in the East Anatolian Fault Zone in Light of the 6 February Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes,” Infrastructures 9, no. 12 (2024): 219, https://doi.org/10.3390/INFRASTRUCTURES9120219.

[17] P. Bocchini, D. M. Frangopol, T. Ummenhofer, and T. Zinke, “Resilience and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure: Toward a Unified Approach,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems 20, no. 2 (2014): 04014004, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000177.

[18] M. Inel, S. M. Senel, S. Toprak, and Y. Manav, “Seismic Risk Assessment of Buildings in Urban Areas: A Case Study for Denizli, Turkey,” Natural Hazards 46 (2008): 265-285, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9187-1.

[19] A. Yakut, H. Sucuoğlu, and S. Akkar, “Seismic Risk Prioritization of Residential Buildings in Istanbul,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41 (2012): 1533-1547, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2215.

[20] C. Yepes-Estrada, V. Silva, J. Valcárcel, et al., “Modeling the Residential Building Inventory in South America for Seismic Risk Assessment,” Earthquake Spectra 33, no. 1 (2017): 299-322, https://chooser.crossref.org/?doi=10.1193%2F101915eqs155dp.

[21] A. Calderon and V. Silva, “Probabilistic Seismic Vulnerability and Loss Assessment of the Residential Building Stock in Costa Rica,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17, no. 3 (2019): 1257-1284, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0499-1.

[22] A. B. Acevedo, C. Yepes-Estrada, D. González, et al., “Seismic Risk Assessment for the Residential Buildings of the Major Three Cities in Colombia: Bogotá, Medellín, and Cali,” Earthquake Spectra 36, no. 1_suppl (2020): 298-320, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020942537.

[23] Y. Torres, S. Martínez-Cuevas, S. Molina-Palacios, J. J. Arranz, and Á. Arredondo, “Using Remote Sensing for Exposure and Seismic Vulnerability Evaluation: Is It Reliable?,” GIScience & Remote Sensing 60, no. 1 (2023): 2196162, https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2023.2196162.

[24] K. Yu, Seismic Vulnerability Assessment for Montreal—An Application of HAZUS-MH4 (Thesis Master of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, 2011).

[25] M. J. Nollet, K. Lefebvre, and O. Chaallal, “Structural Characteristic of Historical Buildings in Old Montreal,” in 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2004).

[26] P. Rosset, M. Kert, S. Youance, M. J. Nollet, and L. Chouinard, “The Use of HAZCAN to Assess the Earthquake Risk of Residential Buildings in Montreal, Canada,” in CSCE Annual Conference (2019).

[27] P. Rosset, L. Chouinard, and M. J. Nollet, “ Consequences on Residential Buildings in Greater Montreal for a Repeat of the 1732 M5.8 Montreal Earthquake,” in Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference, CSCE, eds. S. Walbridge, et al. (Springer, 2021), 667-679.

[28] Statistics Canada, 2021 Census of Population, Household and Dwelling Characteristics (2021).

[29] FEMA, Hazus Earthquake Model Technical Manual: Hazus 5.1 (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2022).

[30] Z. Spicer, Too Big, Yet Still Too Small: The Mixed Legacy of the Montréal and Toronto Amalgamations (2014).

[31] Kircher and Associates C, and Degenkolb Engineers, Seismic Risk Assessment of VA Hospital Buildings, Risk Assessment Methods (Phase I Report) (National Institute of Building Sciences, 2010).

[32] C. A. Kircher, R. K. Reitherman, R. V. Whitman, and C. Arnold, “Estimation of Earthquake Losses to Buildings,” Earthquake Spectra 13, no. 4 (1997): 703-720.

[33] M. Ulmi, C. L. Wagner, M. Wojtarowicz, et al., Hazus-MH 2.1 Canada User and Technical Manual: Earthquake Module (2014).

[34] M. Montazeri and A. Abo El Ezz, “Assessment of Structural Systems of Residential Buildings With Unreinforced Masonry Walls in Montreal,” in 15th Canadian Masonry Symposium (2025).

[35] D. B. Hanna and F. Dufaux, Montreal: A Rich Tradition in Medium Density Housing (2002).

[36] D. B. Hanna, “Montreal, a City Built by Small Builders, 1867-1880,” Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (McGill University, 1986).

[37] A. Gendron, N. M. Jose, H. Ravary-Berger, and L. Chouinard, “Structural Characterization of Residential Buildings in Montreal With Mixed Structural Systems for Seismic Risk Studies,” in 12th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2019).

[38] R. A. Orr, Canadian Practice in Wood Frame Construction, Technical Paper No. 217 (1996).

[39] Clayton Research Associates and Scanada Consultants, The Housing Industry: Perspective and Prospective, Working Paper Two, The Evaluation of Housing Production Process 1946-86 (1989).

[40] A. Abo El Ezz, K. Lefebvre, and M. J. Nollet, “Seismic Performance Assessment of Masonry Infill Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Eastern Canada,” IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering 7, no. 3 (2014): 207-218.

[41] CSA, CSA A371-14: Masonry Construction for Buildings (Canadian Standards Association, 2015).

[42] R. De la Riva, S. Gagnon, and G. Affleck, Plex Housing: A Renewed Tradition (2000).

[43] M. H. Kraiem, A. Khaled, and M. J. Nollet, “ Assessment of the Lateral Bearing Capacity of Traditional Walls Made of Timber Planks,” Proceedings of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, CSCE 2022 (Springer, 2022), 15-25.

[44] R. Legault, “Architecture et forme urbaine : l'exemple du triplex à Montréal de 1870 à 1914,” Urban History Review 18, no. 1 (1989): 1-10.

[45] J. Li, Wood Frame Design and Construction (University of British Columbia, 2013).

[46] P. Adebar, “Compression Failure of Thin Concrete Walls During 2010 Chile Earthquake: Lessons for Canadian Design Practice,” Canadian Journal of Civil Eengineering 40 (2013): 711-721.

[47] Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, “Tallest Building Lists,” accessed July 29, 2024, https://www.ctbuh.org/.

[48] J. Pao and S. Brzev, “Concrete Shear Wall High-Rise Buildings,” in World Housing Encyclopedia Report, ed. O. Moroni (2002).

[49] S. K. Raina, High-Rise Habitation in Central Urban Areas, Master's thesis (McGill University, 1975).

[50] J. Yathon, P. Adebar, and K. J. Elwood, “A Detailed Inventory of Non-Ductile Concrete Shear Wall Buildings,” Earthquake Spectra 33, no. 2 (2017): 605-622.

[51] NRCC, National Building Code of Canada, Associate Committee on the National Building Code (National Research Council of Canada, 2010).

[52] CSA, CSA Standard O86: Engineering Design in Wood (Canadian Standards Association, 2024).

[53] CSA, CSA Standard A23.3, Code for the Design of Concrete Structures for Buildings (Canadian Standards Association, 2019).

[54] M. Montazeri and A. Abo El Ezz, “Earthquake Economic Loss Assessment of Existing Concrete Shear Wall Residential Buildings in Eastern Canada,” Earthquake Engineering and Resilience 3, no. 2 (2024): 289-312, https://doi.org/10.1002/EER2.84.

[55] P. Rosset, M. Kert, S. Youance, M. J. Nollet, and L. Chouinard, “ Could Montreal Residential Buildings Suffer Important Losses in Case of Major Earthquakes?,” in 12th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering (CCEE, 2019).

[56] FEMA, FEMA P-154, Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards: A Handbook, 3rd ed. (Applied Technology Council, 2015).

[57] FEMA, BCA Toolkit Seismic Structural Module Methodology Update: A Bridge Between ASCE 41-17 and Hazus-OSHPD (2023).

[58] A. Abo El Ezz, “Probabilistic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Stone Masonry Structures” Ph.D. thesis (École de Technologie Supérieure, Université du Québec, 2013).

[59] G. Bélec, Seismic Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in Canada (Thesis Master of Applied Science in Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, 2016), https://doi.org/10.20381/RUOR-5230.

[60] NRCC, National Building Code of Canada, Associate Committee on the National Building Code (National Research Council of Canada, 1990).

[61] P. Adebar and G. Sainz Albanez, “Design of Gravity-Load Frames in Shear Wall Buildings for Seismic Deformation Demands: The Canadian Code Approach,” in Canadian Conference—Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2023 (2023).

[62] M. Panneton, P. Léger, and R. Tremblay, “Inelastic Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Building According to the National Building Code of Canada 2005,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 33, no. 2 (2006): 854-871.

[63] D. Gilles and G. McClure, “Measured Natural Periods of Concrete Shear Wall Buildings: Insights for the Design of Canadian Buildings,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 39, no. 8 (2012): 867-877, https://doi.org/10.1139/L2012-074.

[64] S. Dehghani and L. Tobber, “Implications of the 2020 National Building Code of Canada Updates on the Design Demands for Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Buildings,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 51 (2024): 858-873, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2023-0111.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Earthquake Engineering and Resilience published by Tianjin University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.