Systematic investigation of Iranian Vacuum Bottom hydrodenitrogenation to produce clean fuel oil for marine transportation

Abstract

Recent environmental regulations have urged refiners to decrease NO _x emissions related to fuels particularly used in marine transportation. To this, hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) of Iranian Vacuum Bottom (IVB), as one of the most abundant but problematic effluents of Iranian refineries used for marine applications, was evaluated for the very first time via batch hydrotreating procedure over a commercial NiMo catalyst. First, the feed material's physicochemical properties were fully analyzed using several analytic techniques such as CHNS, micro-carbon residue, and TGA. Process chemistry of the HDN and mild hydrocracking (MHC) processes was studied systematically following an L₉-assisted design of experiment (Taguchi method) whereby temperature (350–410 °C), reaction time (1–3 h), oil content:catalyst ratio (1.5–2.5), and H₂ initial pressure (3.0–7.0 MPa) were considered as control factors. Adding to the highly pre-pressurized medium (H₂ initial pressure of 7.0 MPa) at elevated temperature (410 °C) as the most favorable condition for HDN and MHC reactions, results also highlighted a few critical interactions between the operating variables. The key was simultaneous saturation and decomposition of the highly aromatic nature of IVB, under which 65.3% of nitrogen impurities were taken out of the feed’s recalcitrant network. Notably, we took advantage of some well-known analytic techniques like Sim Dis and GC–MS to shed light on the origin of the N-containing compounds in the feed material and physicochemical characteristics of liquid products. These fuel-related analyses provided us a deeper look into the process chemistry using thermodynamic and kinetic backgrounds.

Keywords

Iranian Vacuum Bottom (IVB) / Hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) / Marine transportation / Clean fuel oil production / Design of experiment (DOE)

References

[1] Ali SA. Thermodynamic aspects of aromatic hydrogenation. Pet Sci Technol, 2007, 25: 1293-1304

[2] Al-Marshed A, Hart A, Leeke G Optimization of heavy oil upgrading using dispersed nanoparticulate iron oxide as a catalyst. Energy Fuels, 2015, 29: 6306-6316

[3] Ancheyta J, Alvarez-Majmutov A, Leyva C (2016) Hydrotreating of oil fractions. In: Multiphase catalytic reactors: theory, design, manufacturing, and applications. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, pp 295–329

[4] Angevine PJ, Degnan Jr TF, Landis ME (1989) Process for hydrotreating residual petroleum oil

[5] ASTM D4052-18a (2018) Standard test method for density, relative density, and API gravity of liquids by digital density meter

[6] ASTM D4294-16e1 (2016) Standard test method for sulfur in petroleum and petroleum products by energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry

[7] ASTM D-445 (2019) Standard test method for kinematic viscosity of transparent and opaque liquids (and calculation of dynamic viscosity)

[8] ASTM D4530-15 (2015) Standard test method for determination of carbon residue (micro method)

[9] ASTM D4809-18 (2018) Standard test method for heat of combustion of liquid hydrocarbon fuels by bomb calorimeter (precision method)

[10] ASTM D5291-16 (2016) Standard test methods for instrumental determination of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in petroleum products and lubricants

[11] ASTM D-7169 (2011) ASTM D7169, Standard test method for boiling point distribution of samples with residues such as crude oils and atmospheric and vacuum residues by high temperature gas chromatography

[12] ASTM D93-18 (2018) Standard test methods for flash point by pensky-martens closed cup tester

[13] Athreya S, Venkatesh DYD (2012) Application of taguchi method for optimization of process parameters in improving the surface roughness of lathe facing operation

[14] Battiston A, Abdo A, Moraca L et al (2019) New catalysts for low and medium pressure hydrotreating. Digit. Refin

[15] Bhran AA, Shoaib AM, Umana B. Optimization of crude oil hydrotreating process as a function of operating conditions: application of response surface methodology. Comput Chem Eng, 2016, 89: 158-165

[16] Breysse M, Furimsky E, Kasztelan S Hydrogen activation by transition metal sulfides. Catal Rev, 2002, 44: 651-735

[17] Calderón CJ, Ancheyta J. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a slurry-phase reactor for hydrotreating of oil fractions. Energy Fuels, 2017, 31: 5691-5700

[18] Calderón CJ, Ancheyta J. Modeling of CSTR and SPR small-scale isothermal reactors for heavy oil hydrocracking and hydrotreating. Fuel, 2018, 216: 852-860

[19] Castañeda LC, Muñoz JAD, Ancheyta J (2014) Current situation of emerging technologies for upgrading of heavy oils. In: Catalysis today, pp 248–273

[20] Castello D, Haider MS, Rosendahl LA. Catalytic upgrading of hydrothermal liquefaction biocrudes: different challenges for different feedstocks. Renew Energy, 2019, 141: 420-430

[21] Chen K, Liu H, Guo A Study of the thermal performance and interaction of petroleum residue fractions during the coking process. Energy Fuels, 2012, 26: 6343-6351

[22] Choudhary TV, Parrott S, Johnson B. Understanding the hydrodenitrogenation chemistry of heavy oils. Catal Commun, 2008, 9: 1853-1857

[23] Cui Q, Ma X, Nakano K Hydrotreating reactivities of atmospheric residues and correlation with their composition and properties. Energy Fuels, 2018, 32: 6726-6736

[24] Davarpanah L, Vahabzadeh F, Dermanaki A. Structural Study of Asphaltenes from Iranian Heavy Crude Oil. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev d’IFP Energies Nouv, 2015, 70: 1035-1049

[25] DieselNet (2017) Emission standards: IMO marine engine regulations. DieselNet

[26] Feng X, Shen Z, Li D Kinetic parameter estimation and simulation of trickle-bed reactor for hydrodenitrogenation of whole-fraction low-temperature coal tar. Energy Sources A Recover Util Environ Eff, 2019, 41: 802-810

[27] Fratila D, Caizar C. Application of Taguchi method to selection of optimal lubrication and cutting conditions in face milling of AlMg₃. J Clean Prod, 2011, 19: 640-645

[28] Furimsky E, Massoth FE. Hydrodenitrogenation of petroleum. Catal Rev, 2005, 47: 297-489

[29] Gioia F, Lee V. Effect of hydrogen pressure on catalytic hydrodenitrogenation of quinoline. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev, 1986, 25: 918-925

[30] Haelsig CP, Turner J (2006) Special report: Clean fuels: what are the experiences gained from clean fuels projects? Hydrocarb Process 85

[31] Haider M, Castello D, Michalski K Catalytic hydrotreatment of microalgae biocrude from continuous hydrothermal liquefaction: heteroatom removal and their distribution in distillation cuts. Energies, 2018, 11: 3360

[32] Hamidi Zirasefi M, Khorasheh F, Ivakpour J, Mohammadzadeh A. Improvement of the thermal cracking product quality of heavy vacuum residue using solvent deasphalting pretreatment. Energy Fuels, 2016, 30: 10322-10329

[33] Jarullah AT (2011) Kinetic modelling simulation and optimal operation of trickle bed reactor for hydrotreating of crude oil. kinetic parameters estimation of hydrotreating reactions in trickle bed reactor (TBR) via pilot plant experiments; Optimal design and operation of an industrial TBR with heat integration and economic evaluation

[34] JorgeAncheyta MS, Rana E. Hydroprocessing of heavy petroleum feeds: tutorial. Catal Today, 2005, 109: 3-15

[35] Kohansal K, Toor S, Sharma K Hydrothermal liquefaction of pre-treated municipal solid waste (biopulp) with recirculation of concentrated aqueous phase. Biomass Bioenerg, 2021, 148: 106032

[36] Kokliukhin A, Nikulshina M, Sheldaisov-Meshcheryakov A CoMo hydrotreating catalysts supported on Al₂O₃, SiO₂ and SBA-15 prepared from single Co2Mo10-heteropolyacid: in search of self-promotion effect. Catal Lett, 2018

[37] Lee DK, Lee IC, Woo SI. Effects of transition metal addition to CoMo/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst on the hydrotreating reactions of atmospheric residual oil. Appl Catal A Gen, 1994, 109: 195-210

[38] Lei Z, Gao L, Shui H Hydrotreatment of heavy oil from a direct coal liquefaction process on sulfided Ni-W/SBA-15 catalysts. Fuel Process Technol, 2011

[39] Lim SH, Go KS, Nho NS, Lee JG. Effect of reaction temperature and time on the products and asphaltene dispersion stability in slurry-phase hydrocracking of vacuum residue. Fuel, 2018, 234: 305-311

[40] Meyers RA. Handbook of petroleum refining processes, 2016 4 New York McGraw-Hill Inc

[41] Munirathinam R, Laurenti D, Pirngruber GD, Uzio D. Efficient CoMoS catalysts supported on bio-inspired polymer coated alumina for hydrotreating reactions. ChemistrySelect, 2017, 2: 2373-2382

[42] Nguyen MT, Pirngruber GD, Chainet F Indole hydrodenitrogenation over alumina and silica-alumina-supported sulfide catalysts-comparison with quinoline. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2017, 56: 11088-11099

[43] Nguyen MT, Tayakout-Fayolle M, Chainet F Use of kinetic modeling for investigating support acidity effects of NiMo sulfide catalysts on quinoline hydrodenitrogenation. Appl Catal A Gen, 2017, 530: 132-144

[44] Pinos AAR, Badoga S, Dalai AK, Adjaye J. Modelling of H2 consumption and process optimization for hydrotreating of light gas oils. Can J Chem Eng, 2019, 97: 1828-1837

[45] Prada Silvy R. Scale-up of a NiMoP/γ Al₂O₃ catalyst for the hydrotreating and mild hydrocracking of heavy gasoil. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev d’IFP Energies Nouv, 2019, 74: 22

[46] Prada Silvy R. Parameters controlling the scale-up of CoMoP/γ-Al₂O₃ and NiMoP/γ-Al₂O₃ catalysts for the hydrotreating and mild-hydrocracking of heavy gasoil. Catal Today, 2019

[47] Prado GHC, Rao Y, De Klerk A. Nitrogen removal from oil: a review. Energy Fuels, 2017, 31: 14-36

[48] Ramírez-Castelán CE, Hidalgo-Vivas A, Brix J, et al (2017) Modelling of an adiabatic trickle-bed reactor with phase change. In: Computer aided chemical engineering. Elsevier BV, pp 115–120

[49] Ramírez-Castelán CE, Hidalgo-Vivas A, Brix J Mathematical modelling and simulation of a trickle-bed reactor for hydrotreating of petroleum feedstock. Int J Chem React Eng, 2019

[50] Sahu R, Song BJ, Im JS A review of recent advances in catalytic hydrocracking of heavy residues. J Ind Eng Chem, 2015, 27: 12-24

[51] Salimi M, Tavasoli A, Rosendahl L. Optimization of γ-alumina porosity via response surface methodology: the influence of engineering support on the performance of a residual oil hydrotreating catalyst. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2020

[52] Schachtl E, Yoo JS, Gutiérrez OY Impact of Ni promotion on the hydrogenation pathways of phenanthrene on MoS₂/γ-Al₂O₃. J Catal, 2017, 352: 171-181

[53] Tailleur RG (2014) Deep hydrotreating diesel fractions for low-sulfur fuel production using gas-phase and trickle bed reactors systems operating in parallel. In: Catalysis today. pp 133–152

[54] Tailleur RG. Hydrogenation and hydrodesulfurization in gas phase of light hydrocarbons from hydrocracking, desulfurization and delayed coking. I Catalyst deactivation. Chem Eng Sci, 2019, 210: 115195

[55] Weitkamp J. Catalytic hydrocracking-mechanisms and versatility of the process. ChemCatChem, 2012, 4: 292-306

[56] Xiaomin L, Zhaoming W, Yezhen L, Qifeng L (2021) Research on emission standards and control technology of heavy commercial diesel vehicles. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. IOP Publishing Ltd, p 12030

[57] Zeuthen P (2019) A new generation of catalyst is born: TK-6001 HySwell. Digit. Refin

[58] Zhang J, Tian Y, Qiao Y Structure and reactivity of Iranian vacuum residue and its eight group-fractions. Energy Fuels, 2017, 31: 8072-8086