Measuring integrated accessibility for sustainable mobility: a fuzzy set approach case study

Abstract

Sustainable transportation is vital to climate justice and social equity. Despite the efforts to achieve sustainability, there is still a lack of adequate measurement that integrates land use and transportation systems, which can be barriers to planning implementation. With methodological improvements in fuzzy theory application, this study develops an integrated index to measure the sustainability of multimodal accessibility. We do so by defining a fuzziness degree based on the different trip purposes and modes of transportation with a case study in Isfahan, Iran. Sustainable accessibility indicators were developed for walking, biking, and public transportation to represent the performance of each transportation system, considering the integration with land-use patterns. We analyze transportation modes and the accessibility to five main urban activities, including employment opportunities, education, healthcare, shopping, and recreation services, based on the travel distances, followed by a statistical integration method with Principal Components Analysis (PCA) for each travel mode. The outcome provides insights for urban planners and transportation planners to effectively evaluate the degree of integration between transportation and land-use systems and contribute to enhancing sustainable accessibility.

Keywords

Sustainable transportation / Accessibility / Fuzzy set theory / Index integration / Principal components analysis / Geographic information systems (GIS)

References

[1] Amoushahi S, Salmanmahiny A, Moradi H, Tabrizi ARM, Galán C. Localizing sustainable urban development (SUD): Application of an FDM-AHP approach for prioritizing urban sustainability indicators in Iran provinces. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 77: 103592

[2] Banister D. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, New Developments in Urban Transportation Planning, 2008, 15: 73-80

[3] Benenson I, Martens K, Rofé Y, Kwartler A. Public transport versus private car GIS-based estimation of accessibility applied to the Tel Aviv metropolitan area. The Annals of Regional Science, 2011, 47: 499-515

[4] Bertolini L, Le Clercq F, Kapoen L. Sustainable accessibility: A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward. Transport Policy, 2005, 12: 207-220

[5] Bhat, C., Handy, S., Kockelman K., Mahmassani, H., Gopal, A., Srour, I., & Weston, L. (2002). Development of an urban accessibility index: Formulations, aggregation, and application. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas.

[6] Boisjoly G, El-Geneidy AM. How to get there? A critical assessment of accessibility objectives and indicators in metropolitan transportation plans. Transport Policy, 2017, 55: 38-50

[7] Boussauw K, Witlox F. Introducing a commute-energy performance index for Flanders. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 2009, 43: 580-591

[8] Cascetta, E. (2009) Transportation systems analysis: models and applications. Edition: 2nd ed. 2009. Springer Springer Optimization and Its Applications. ISBN: SBN 978-0-387-75857-2

[9] Cervero, R. (1997) Paradigm shift: from automobility to accessibility planning. Urban Futures (Canberra), 9.

[10] Clercq F, Bertolini L. Achieving sustainable accessibility: An evaluation of policy measures in the Amsterdam area. Built Environment, 2003, 29: 36-47

[11] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2002) OECD Guidelines Towards Environmentally Sustainable Transport. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264199293-en

[12] Coppola P, Papa E. Accessibility Planning tools for sustainable and integrated Land Use/Transport (LUT) development: An application to Rome. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 87: 133-146

[13] Dalvi MQ, Martin K. The measurement of accessibility: Some preliminary results. Transportation, 1976, 5: 17-42

[14] Delso J, Martín B, Ortega E, Van De Weghe N. Integrating pedestrian-habitat models and network kernel density estimations to measure street pedestrian suitability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 51: 101736

[15] El-Geneidy A, Cerdá A, Fischler R, Luka N. Evaluating the impacts of transportation plans using accessibility measures. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 2011, 20: 81

[16] El-Geneidy A, Levinson D. Place rank: Valuing spatial interactions. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2011, 11: 643-659

[17] ESRI. (1999). How Fuzzy Membership Works. Retrieved from https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/how-fuzzy-membership-works.htm

[18] Farber, S., Fu, L., (2017). Dynamic public transit accessibility using travel time cubes: Comparing the effects of infrastructure (dis)investments over time. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.10.005

[19] Fernando, M., Samita, S., Abeynayake, R. (2012). Modified factor analysis to construct composite indices: illustration on urbanization index. Tropical Agricultural Research 23 (4), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v23i4.4868

[20] Geurs KT, Van Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 2004, 12: 127-140

[21] Gibbons E, O’Mahony M. External cost internalisation of urban transport: A case study of Dublin. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 64: 401-410

[22] Grengs J. Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit. Journal of Transport Geography, 2010, 18: 42-54

[23] Grengs J. Nonwork accessibility as a social equity indicator. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2015, 9: 1-14

[24] Halden D. Using accessibility measures to integrate land use and transport policy in Edinburgh and the Lothians. Transport Policy, 2002, 9: 313-324

[25] Handy SL, Niemeier DA. Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 1997, 29: 1175-1194

[26] Holmgren J. Meta-analysis of public transport demand. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 2007, 41: 1021-1035

[27] Ikram SZ, Hu Y, Wang F, (2015) Disparities in Spatial Accessibility ff Pharmacies in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Geographical Review 105(4);492–510. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43916285

[28] Kaiser HF. A revised measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic data matrices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981, 41: 379-381

[29] Kim C, Sang S, Ban H. Exploring job centers by accessibility using fuzzy set approach: The case study of the Columbus MSA. GeoJournal, 2014, 79: 209-222

[30] Kotzee, I. & Reyers, B. (2016). Piloting a social-ecological index for measuring flood resilience: A composite index approach, Ecological Indicators 60, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.018

[31] Litman T. Transportation cost and benefit analysis. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2009, 31(1): 9

[32] Liu, L., Porr, A., & Miller, H. J. (2022). Realizable accessibility: Evaluating the reliability of public transit accessibility using high-resolution real-time data. Journal of Geographical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-022-00382-w

[33] Lucas K, Wee B, Maat K. A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: Combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation, 2016, 43: 473-490

[34] Morris JM, Dumble P, Wigan MR. Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part a: General, 1979, 13: 91-109

[35] Mutiarani ND, Siswantoro D. The impact of local government characteristics on the accomplishment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Cogent Business & Management, 2020, 7: 1847751

[36] Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., Giovannini, E. (2005) Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1787/533411815016

[37] O’Regan B, Morrissey J, Foley W, Moles R. The relationship between settlement population size and sustainable development measured by two sustainability metrics. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2009, 29: 169-178

[38] Oh K, Jeong Y. The usefulness of the GIS—fuzzy set approach in evaluating the urban residential environment. Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design, 2002, 29: 589-606

[39] El Rashidy, RAH and Grant-Muller, S. (2019). A composite resilience index for road transport networks. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, 172 (3), 174–183. ISSN 0965-092X

[40] Reisi M, Aye L, Rajabifard A, Ngo T. Transport sustainability index: Melbourne case study. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 43: 288-296

[41] Reisi M, Aye L, Rajabifard A, Ngo T. Land-use planning: Implications for transport sustainability. Land Use Policy, 2016, 50: 252-261

[42] Rivas, V.c.M., Merelo, J., Rojas, I., Romero, G., Castillo, P., Carpio, J. . Evolving two-dimensional fuzzy systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 138: 381-398

[43] Silva C, Pinho P. The Structural Accessibility Layer (SAL): Revealing how urban structure constrains travel choice. Environment and Planning A, 2010, 42: 2735-2752

[44] Spangenberg JH. Institutional sustainability indicators: An analysis of the institutions in Agenda 21 and a draft set of indicators for monitoring their effectivity. Sustainable Development, 2002, 10: 103-115

[45] Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. Pearson College Div; 5th edition

[46] Tahmasbi B, Haghshenas H. Public transport accessibility measure based on weighted door to door travel time. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2019, 76: 163-177

[47] Thériault M, Des Rosiers F. (2004) Modelling perceived accessibility to urban amenities using fuzzy logic, transportation GIS and origin-destination surveys. Proceedings of Proceedings of AGILE 2004 7th Conference on Geographic Information Science, Crete University Press, Heraklion, Greece, pp. 475–485.

[48] United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

[49] Vale, D. (2009) Sustainable urban form, accessibility disparity and spatial inequalities: a case-study from Lisbon. Proceedings of CITTA 1st annual conference on planning research evaluation in planning, Porto, Portugal.

[50] Vega A. Using Place Rank to measure sustainable accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012, 24: 411-418

[51] Wali B. Interactive impacts of walkability, social vulnerability, & travel behavior on COVID-19 mortality: A hierarchical Bayesian spatial random parameter approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 91: 104454

[52] World Resource Institute, (2020). Climate Watch Data Explorer [WWW Document]. URL https://www.climatewatchdata.org/data-explorer/historical-emissions?historical-emissions-data-sources=cait&historical-emissions-gases=co2&historical-emissions-regions=All%20Selected&historical-emissions-sectors=total-including-lucf%2Ctransportation&page=1&sort_col=country&sort_dir=ASC (accessed 3.8.23).

[53] Yamasaki K, Yamada T. A framework to assess the local implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 11. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 84: 104002

[54] Zadeh LA. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8: 338-353

[55] Zahabi SAH, Miranda-Moreno L, Patterson Z, Barla P, Harding C. Transportation greenhouse gas emissions and its relationship with urban form, transit accessibility and emerging green technologies: A Montreal case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 54: 966-978