Neighborhood effects and consequences of criminal justice contact: a research framework

Abstract

This paper proposes a framework to examine how neighborhood factors influence criminal justice (CJ) contact and contribute to disparities across multiple stages of the justice process. By conceptualizing the punishment process as a dynamic set of decision-making points, this study highlights the role of neighborhood context in shaping offenders’ CJ trajectories and post-CJ residential inequality. Using Harris County, Texas, as a case study, this research considers individual-, neighborhood-, and event-level variables to understand the cumulative effects of neighborhood characteristics on CJ outcomes. This study underscores the critical need to investigate neighborhood mobility and its broader implications for community development and public policy. The findings can be supported by extensive data from the Federal Statistical Research Data Centers and the Criminal Justice Administrative Records System, offering a robust analysis of offenders’ spatial patterns and economic transitions.

References

[1] AnselinL. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 1995, 27(2): 93-115

[2] AnselinL. Exploring spatial data with GeoDaTM: a workbook. Center for spatially integrated social science, 1963, 2005157

[3] AnselinL, McCannM. OpenGeoDa, open source software for the exploration and visualization of geospatial data. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, 2009550-551

[4] ApelRJ, SweetenG. Propensity score matching in criminology and criminal justice, 2010Handbook of quantitative criminology543-562

[5] BankstonWB. Legal and extralegal offender traits and decision making in the criminal justice system. Sociological Spectrum, 1983, 3(1): 1-18

[6] BatesD, MaechlerM, BolkerB, WalkerS. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 2015, 67(1): 1-48

[7] BaumerEP. Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 2013, 30(2): 231-261

[8] CampbellCA, BarnesA, PappJ, D’amatoC, AndersonVR, MosesN. Understanding the role of neighborhood typology and sociodemographic characteristics on time to recidivism among adjudicated youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2020, 47(9): 1079-1096

[9] ClearTR, RoseDR, RyderJA. Incarceration and the community: The problem of removing and returning offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 2001, 47(3): 335-351

[10] DeMarcoLM. No Room to Fall: Criminal Justice Contact and Neighborhood Disadvantage, 2024Social Problemsspae012

[11] DiPreteTA, EirichGM. Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annu Rev Sociol, 2006, 32(1): 271-297

[12] DoernerJK, DemuthS. The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in US federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 2010, 27(1): 1-27

[13] DrukkerM, KaplanC, van OsJ. Residential instability in socioeconomically deprived neighbourhoods, good or bad?. Health & Place, 2005, 11(2): 121-129

[14] ElonheimoH, GyllenbergD, HuttunenJ, RistkariT, SillanmäkiL, SouranderA. Criminal offending among males and females between ages 15 and 30 in a population-based nationwide 1981 birth cohort: Results from the FinnCrime Study. Journal of Adolescence, 2014, 37(8): 1269-1279

[15] FinlayK, Mueller-SmithM. Criminal Justice Administrative Records System (CJARS), 2021

[16] HaganJ. Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: An assessment of a sociological viewpoint. Law & Society Review, 1974, 8(3): 357-383

[17] HippJR, PetersiliaJ, TurnerS. Parolee recidivism in California: The effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology, 2010, 48(4): 947-979

[18] KubrinCE, SquiresG, StewartE. Neighborhoods, race, and recidivism: The Community reoffending nexus and its implications for African Americans. In SAGE Race Relations Abstracts, 20077-37

[19] KurlychekMC, JohnsonBD. Cumulative disadvantage in the American criminal justice system. Annual Review of Criminology, 2019, 2(1): 291-319

[20] KutateladzeBL, LawsonVZ. A new look at inequality: Introducing and testing a cross-sectional equality measurement framework in New York City. Social Indicators Research, 2017, 132: 993-1022

[21] KutateladzeBL, AndiloroNR, JohnsonBD, SpohnCC. Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 2014, 52(3): 514-551

[22] LeeLH, KimM, CarlsonC, EllisT, JohnsonK, PretzA. The association between perceptions of neighborhood conditions and the employment of emerging adults formerly involved in the juvenile justice system. Youth & Society, 2022, 54(7): 1280-1303

[23] LeipnikM, YeX, SernaJ, StrongJ, WilkinsC, WuL. Spatial aspects of restrictions on registered sex offenders. Geographical Review, 2016, 106(2): 312-330

[24] LiX, XuH, HuangX, GuoC, KangY, YeX. Emerging geo-data sources to reveal human mobility dynamics during COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities and challenges. Computational Urban Science, 2021, 1: 1-9

[25] LiuQ, WangZ, YeX. Comparing mobility patterns between residents and visitors using geo-tagged social media data. Transactions in GIS, 2018, 22(6): 1372-1389

[26] MassogliaM, FirebaughG, WarnerC. Racial variation in the effect of incarceration on neighborhood attainment. American Sociological Review, 2013, 78(1): 142-165

[27] MitchellO. A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2005, 21(4): 439-466

[28] MorenoffJD, SampsonRJ. Violent crime and the spatial dynamics of neighborhood transition: Chicago, 1970–1990. Social Forces, 1997, 76(1): 31-64

[29] OsgoodDW, ChambersJM. Social disorganization outside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence. Criminology, 2000, 38(1): 81-116

[30] Pager, D., Western, B., & Sugie, N. (2009). Sequencing disadvantage: Barriers to Employment Facing Young Black and White men with criminal records first published April 15, 2009 Research Article find in PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208330793

[31] ReySJ, YeX. Comparative spatial dynamics of regional systems. Progress in spatial analysis: methods and applications, 2010441-463

[32] SampsonRJ. Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect, 2012University of Chicago Press

[33] ShawCR, McKayHD. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas: A Study of Rates of Delinquency in Relation to Differential Characteristics of Local Communities in American Cities, 1969University of Chicago Press140-169

[34] SpohnC. Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 2000, 3(1): 427-501

[35] SpohnC, FornangoR. US attorneys and substantial assistance departures: Testing for interprosecutor disparity. Criminology, 2009, 47(3): 813-846

[36] SpohnC, HolleranD. The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 2000, 38(1): 281-306

[37] The Sentencing Project. State by state data, 2022

[38] TonryM. Crime and Justice, 2015A Review of Research

[39] TurneyK, WakefieldS. Criminal justice contact and inequality. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2019, 5(1): 1-23

[40] UlmerJT. Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 2012, 29(1): 1-40

[41] VisherC, FarrellJ. Chicago Communities and Prisoner Reentry, 2005Urban Institute

[42] WakefieldS, UggenC. Incarceration and stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 2010, 36(1): 387-406

[43] WangX, MearsDP. A multilevel test of minority threat effects on sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2010, 26: 191-215

[44] WarnerC. The effect of incarceration on residential mobility between poor and nonpoor neighborhoods. City & Community, 2016, 15(4): 423-443

[45] WarnerC, RemsterB. Criminal justice contact, residential independence, and returns to the parental home. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2021, 83(2): 322-339

[46] WelchS, GruhlJ, SpohnC. Dismissal, conviction, and incarceration of hispanic defendants: A comparison with anglos and blacks. Social Science Quarterly, 1984, 65(2): 257

[47] Wilson, W. J. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. University of Chicago Press.

[48] WooldredgeJ. Convicting and incarcerating felony offenders of intimate assault and the odds of new assault charges. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2007, 35(4): 379-389

[49] WuL, XuX, YeX, ZhuX. Repeat and near-repeat burglaries and offender involvement in a large Chinese city. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2015, 42(2): 178-189

[50] YeX, WuL. Analyzing the dynamics of homicide patterns in Chicago: ESDA and spatial panel approaches. Applied Geography, 2011, 31(2): 800-807

Funding

TAMU-PVAMU PRISE grant(TAMU-PVAMU PRISE grant)

National Science Foundation(2331984)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration(80NSSC22KM0052)