Effect of Tube Diameter and Tube Length on Confined Water in Nanotubes: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study

Zidi Yan , Zhi Zhu , Xiang-Yu Kong , Hongyan Xiao , Lei Jiang

Chemical Research in Chinese Universities ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 1056 -1066.

PDF
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 1056 -1066. DOI: 10.1007/s40242-025-5144-3
Article
research-article

Effect of Tube Diameter and Tube Length on Confined Water in Nanotubes: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The confined water in carbon nanotubes (CNTs) has an extremely fast transport rate, which has aroused great research interest. Previous studies have explored how various factors affect the structures and transport properties of confined water in CNTs. However, the fundamental understanding is still incomplete. Therefore, we studied confined water systems of different diameters and lengths in detail, and considered the effects of thermal fields and terahertz fields through molecular dynamics simulations. The simulation results revealed that the tube diameter mainly affected confined water structure; the tube length regulated the overall transport performance by adjusting the dipole flipping process and molecular translocation distance of confined water. Increasing the tube length led to a decrease in water flow, but enhanced the stability of transient unidirectional transport events. When the temperature rose, water molecules accelerated their movement, resulting in an increase in the system flow. Meanwhile, the increase in temperature caused the dipole flipping of confined water more frequently, thereby making the unidirectional transport unstable and affecting the system flux. Unlike the non-selectivity of the thermal effect, terahertz light could selectively enhance the transport of confined water. The research results are expected to promote a deeper understanding of confined water in CNTs.

Keywords

Confined water / Carbon nanotube / Molecular dynamics / Tube diameter / Tube length

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zidi Yan, Zhi Zhu, Xiang-Yu Kong, Hongyan Xiao, Lei Jiang. Effect of Tube Diameter and Tube Length on Confined Water in Nanotubes: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2025, 41(5): 1056-1066 DOI:10.1007/s40242-025-5144-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

XiaoS, ZhangD, PanD, ZhuW, LiuP, CaiY, LiG, LiHNat. Commun., 2019, 101570.

[2]

LeeW J, LeeJ M, KochuveeduS T, HanT H, JeongH Y, ParkM, YunJ M, KwonJ, NoK, KimD H, KimS OACS Nano, 2012, 6935.

[3]

LeeB, BaekY, LeeM, JeongD H, LeeH H, YoonJ, KimY HNat. Commun., 2015, 67109.

[4]

YangX, PrabowoJ, ChenJ, SheF, LaiL, LiuF, HuaZ, WangY, FangJ, GohK, ZhangD, LiH, WeiL, ChenYAdv. Mater., 2025, 372504618.

[5]

DasR, AliM E, HamidS B A, RamakrishnaS, ChowdhuryZ ZDesalination, 2014, 33697.

[6]

LiuX-Y, PengH-J, ZhangQ, HuangJ-Q, LiuX-F, WangL, HeX, ZhuW, WeiFACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2013, 2200.

[7]

ZhangY, BaiW, ChengX, RenJ, WengW, ChenP, FangX, ZhangZ, PengHAngew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 5314564.

[8]

CaoX T, PatilM P, PhanQ T, LeC M Q, AhnB-H, KimG-D, LimK TJ. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2020, 83173.

[9]

TajkhorshidE, NollertP, JensenM O, MierckeL J, O'connellJ, StroudR M, SchultenKScience, 2002, 296525.

[10]

HummerG, RasaiahJ C, NoworytaJ PNature, 2001, 414188.

[11]

ChenG, SekiY, KimuraH, SakuraiS, YumuraM, HataK, FutabaD NSci. Rep., 2014, 43804.

[12]

WuS-L, ChenC-M, KuoJ-H, WeyM-YChem. Eng. Sci., 2020, 217115541.

[13]

ZhangR, ZhangY, ZhangQ, XieH, QianW, WeiFACS Nano, 2013, 76156.

[14]

GaoC, GuoM, LiuY, ZhangD, GaoF, SunL, LiJ, ChenX, TerronesM, WangYCarbon, 2023, 212118133.

[15]

KhanF S A, MubarakN M, KhalidM, WalvekarR, AbdullahE C, AhmadA, KarriR R, PakalapatiHSci. Rep., 2021, 11843.

[16]

TungN T, TueP T, ThiN L T, OhnoY, MaehashiK, MatsumotoK, NishigakiK, BiyaniM, TakamuraYSci. Rep., 2017, 717881.

[17]

TunuguntlaR H, HenleyR Y, YaoY C, PhamT A, WanunuM, NoyAScience, 2017, 357792.

[18]

JiaY, LuX, CaoZ, YanTPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 2225747.

[19]

LiuD, LiJ, WuJ, LuDACS Omega, 2022, 740466.

[20]

KogaK, GaoG T, TanakaH, ZengX CNature, 2001, 412802.

[21]

ChatzichristosA, HassanJNanomaterials, 2022, 12174.

[22]

PascalT A, GoddardW A, JungYProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2011, 10811794.

[23]

StrioloANanotechnology, 2007, 18475704.

[24]

StrioloANano Lett., 2006, 6633.

[25]

WangQ, LiuL, LiuC, SongJ, GaoXJ. Mol. Liq., 2021, 334116034.

[26]

MukherjeeB, MaitiP K, DasguptaC, SoodA KJ. Chem. Phys., 2007, 126124704.

[27]

TsimpanogiannisI N, MoultosO A, FrancoL F M, SperaM B D M, ErdősM, EconomouI GMol. Simulat., 2018, 45425.

[28]

MengX W, ShenLChem. Phys. Lett., 2020, 739137029.

[29]

KimT, KimG W, JeongH, KimG, JangSPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 22252.

[30]

GongX, LiJ, LuH, WanR, LiJ, HuJ, FangHNat. Nanotechnol., 2007, 2709.

[31]

ZhangX, SuJJ. Mol. Liq., 2021, 328115382.

[32]

PanahiA, SadeghiP, AkhlaghiA, SabourM HDiam. Relat. Mater., 2020, 110108105.

[33]

WanR, LuH, LiJ, BaoJ, HuJ, FangHPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 119898.

[34]

SamA, KV P, SathianS PPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 216566.

[35]

FarimaniA B, AluruN RJ. Phys. Chem. B, 2011, 11512145.

[36]

KannamS K, ToddB D, HansenJ S, DaivisP JJ. Chem. Phys., 2013, 138094701.

[37]

SuJ, GuoHJ. Chem. Phys., 2011, 134244513.

[38]

RitosK, BorgM K, MottramN J, ReeseJ MPhilos. Trans. Royal Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 2016, 37420150025.

[39]

LiH, WangS, ZhengJ, WangJJ. Phys. Chem. C, 2024, 12821190.

[40]

OstlerD, KannamS K, DaivisP J, FrascoliF, ToddB DJ. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 12128158.

[41]

YanZ, KongX-Y, ZhuZ, XiaoHJ. Mol. Liq., 2024, 414126121.

[42]

KalraA, GardeS, HummerGProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003, 10010175.

[43]

WangL, DumontR S, DicksonJ MJ. Chem. Phys., 2012, 137044102.

[44]

HumphreyW, DalkeA, SchultenKJ. Mol. Graph., 1996, 1433.

[45]

JorgensenW L, MaxwellD S, Tirado-RivesJJ. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 11811225.

[46]

TaoJ, SongX, ZhaoT, ZhaoS, LiuHChem. Eng. Sci., 2018, 1921252.

[47]

ZhangX, ZhouW, XuF, WeiM, WangYNanoscale, 2018, 1013242.

[48]

AbrahamM J, MurtolaT, SchulzR, PállS, SmithJ C, HessB, LindahlESoftwareX, 2015, 1/219.

[49]

AgarwalV, HuberG W, ConnerW CJr., AuerbachS MJ. Chem. Phys., 2011, 135134506.

[50]

StrioloA, ChialvoA A, GubbinsK E, CummingsP TJ. Chem. Phys., 2005, 122234712.

[51]

HanasakiI, NakataniAJ. Chem. Phys., 2006, 124174714.

[52]

LiuJ, HeX, ZhangJ Z H, QiL WChem. Sci., 2018, 92065.

[53]

NakamuraY, OhnoTMater. Chem. Phys., 2012, 132682.

[54]

JinL, ZhangD, ZhuY, YangX, GaoY, WangZJ. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2021, 12350.

[55]

ZhuZ, ChangC, ShuY, SongBJ. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2020, 11256.

[56]

IslamM APhys. Scripta, 2004, 70120.

[57]

ZhangQ-L, YangR-Y, WangC-L, HuJPhys. Rev. Fluids, 2022, 7114202.

[58]

ZhuZ, ChenC, ChangC, SongBACS Photonics, 2020, 8781.

[59]

LinY, ShiomiJ, MaruyamaS, AmbergGPhys. Rev. B, 2009, 80045419.

[60]

ZhangQ L, ZhouT, ChangC, GuS Y, WangY J, LiuQ, ZhuZPhys. Rev. Lett., 2024, 132184003.

[61]

WuY, WangZ, LiS, SuJPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2024, 2610919.

[62]

RobinsonF, ShahbabaeiM, KimDEnergies, 2019, 124424.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Jilin University, The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities and Springer-Verlag GmbH

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

111

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/