PDF
Abstract
The formation of azeotropic mixtures between 2-methylfuran (2-MF) and methanol (MeOH) during catalytic hydrogenation of furfural poses a significant challenge for their separation. To address this issue, ethylene glycol (EG) was systematically evaluated as a sustainable extractant for liquid-liquid extraction of the 2-MF-MeOH azeotrope. The σ-profiles of five candidate solvents, tetrahydrofuran (THF), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dimethylacetamide (DMAC), and EG were analyzed. EG was identified as the optimal extractant due to its superior hydrogen-bonding capability. Key operational parameters including equilibrium temperature and azeotropic composition were experimentally optimized. Then, ternary liquidliquid phase equilibrium (LLE) data of 2-MF(1)+MeOH(2)+EG(3) were measured. The non-random two-liquid (NRTL) model demonstrated excellent correlation with LLE data (RMSD<2%), validating its reliability for process simulation. Multi-scale analysis methods for separation mechanism, such as electrostatic potential (ESP) mapping, independent gradient model based on Hirshfeld partition (IGMH), and molecular dynamics simulation were used to confirm the sites and types of interaction. This fundamental understanding of molecular interactions provides critical insights for designing sustainable separation processes in biomass-derived chemical production.
Keywords
Azeotropic separation
/
Liquid-liquid equilibrium
/
Molecular interaction
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Yue Wang, Wenxiu Li, Pengfei Wang, Tao Zhang.
Experimental Study and Mechanism Analysis on the Separation of 2-Methylfuran/Methanol from Biofuel Assisted by Ethylene Glycol.
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities 1-7 DOI:10.1007/s40242-025-5131-8
| [1] |
GandariasI, García-FernándezS, ObregónI, Agirrezabal-TelleriaI, AriasP LFuel Process. Technol., 2018, 178336.
|
| [2] |
KulkarniB B, MaradurS PBioresour. Technol., 2024, 402130805.
|
| [3] |
GiorgianniG, PerathonerS, CentiG, Soo-TangS H, de JongE, van der WaalJ C, AbateSChem. Eng. Res. Des., 2023, 197968.
|
| [4] |
LiB, LiL, SunH, ZhaoCACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 612096.
|
| [5] |
GilkeyM J, PanagiotopoulouP, MironenkoA V, JennessG R, VlachosD G, XuBACS Catal., 2015, 53988.
|
| [6] |
WangC, WeiL, ChengZ, XuH, DanielR, ShuaiSCombust. Sci. Technol., 2015, 188329.
|
| [7] |
BanerjeeD, SahuA K, CleggJ K, UpadhyayulaSChem. Eng. J., 2024, 493152552.
|
| [8] |
YaoC, HouY, WuW, RenS, LiuHGreen Chemistry, 2018, 203101.
|
| [9] |
AghelB, MohadesiM, GouranASep. Sci. Technol., 2019, 553402.
|
| [10] |
WarragS E E, DarwishA S, AdeyemiI A, Hadj-KaliM K, KroonM C, AlNashefI MFluid Phase Equilib., 2020, 517112622.
|
| [11] |
YuY, ZhangL, ZhuC, HuangX, LiaoZ, LiQJ. Solution Chem., 2020, 491.
|
| [12] |
ZhuZ, XuY, FengT, WangN, LiuK, FanH, Reyes-LabartaJ A, WangY, GaoJ, WangLJ. Mol. Liq., 2020, 298111947.
|
| [13] |
CasásL M, OrgeB, FerreiraOJ. Chem. Eng. Data, 2008, 5389.
|
| [14] |
da SilvaJ L, AznarMFuel, 2014, 136316.
|
| [15] |
DaiF, HeG, XinK, ShiM, LiJ, LiQJ. Chem. Thermodyn., 2017, 11591.
|
| [16] |
LiC, WangX, LiH, DuanC, AnL, LiuQJ. Chem. Eng. Data., 2019, 641780.
|
| [17] |
YuY, ZhangX, YiL, LiM, ZhangF, WeiJJ. Chem. Eng. Data., 2022, 671195.
|
| [18] |
RenonH, PrausnitzJ MAlChE J., 1968, 14135.
|
| [19] |
ZhangY, LiH, LiH, ShanR, ZhuZ, WangY, GaoJJ. Chem. Thermodyn., 2022, 167106715.
|
| [20] |
DingY, GuoY, SunY, SunT, YeQ, LiJ, ParicaudP, PengCInd. Eng. Chem. Res., 2022, 6116193
|
| [21] |
BoysS F, BernardiFMol. Phys., 1970, 19553.
|
| [22] |
LuT, ChenFJ. Comput. Chem., 2011, 33580.
|
| [23] |
HumphreyW A D, SchultenKJ. Mol. Graph., 1996, 1433.
|
| [24] |
FuY, SongX, PangY, ZhengY, GaoLJ. Mol. Struct., 2023, 1290136000.
|
| [25] |
MartínezL, AndradeR, BirginE G, MartínezJ MJ. Comput. Chem., 2009, 302157.
|
| [26] |
BerendsenH J C, van der SpoelD, van DrunenRComput. Phys. Commun., 1995, 9143.
|
| [27] |
FanW, GeC, DingD, DengL, GaoJ, XuDJ. Chem. Thermodyn., 2023, 182107036.
|
| [28] |
ZhangA, YanH, NiuX, HanM, WangW, ZhangZ, LuW, LiT, LiQJ. Chem. Eng. Data., 2023, 682645.
|
| [29] |
Araya-LópezC, ContrerasJ, MerletG, CabezasR, OleaF, VillarroelE, SalazarR, RomeroJ, Quijada-MaldonadoEFluid Phase Equilib., 2022, 561113518.
|
| [30] |
ChenX, GaoX, ZhengH, ZhaoS, WangL EFluid Phase Equilib., 2012, 313102.
|
| [31] |
SunC, XingJ, QuY, ZhangY, CuiP, WangY, GaoJInd. Eng. Chem. Res., 2023, 629302.
|
| [32] |
WangW, WangY, LuW, ZhaoW, ZhuZ, CuiP, LiX, SongXSep. Purif. Technol., 2025, 359130587.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Jilin University, The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities and Springer-Verlag GmbH
Just Accepted
This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.