Effects of the molecular weight of PLGA on degradation and drug release in vitro from an mPEG-PLGA nanocarrier

Abstract

We successfully synthesized four kinds of copolymers with varying molecular weights of poly(lactideco- glycolide)(PLGA) to yield methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(lactide-co-glycolide)(mPEG-PLGA) nanocarriers: mPEG-PLGA(3k), mPEG-PLGA(9k), mPEG-PLGA(11k) and mPEG-PLGA(16k). An antitumor drug, 10-hydroxycamptothecin(HCPT), was encapsulated into the mPEG-PLGA nanocarrier cores by self-assembly in dialysis. The lower molecular weight nanocarriers degraded more quickly, resulting in mass loss, pH decline, and a rapid HCPT release rate in vitro. The degradation and drug release of the nanocarriers were dependent on the PLGA molecular weight. However, the larger molecular weight nanocarriers could not increase the loading content and encapsulation efficiency. Considering the antitumor effect of these nanocarriers, the mPEG-PLGA(9k) nanocarrier, which had the highest drug loading content[(7.72±0.57)%] and a relatively high encapsulation efficiency [(22.71±5.53)%], is an optimum agent for drug delivery.

Keywords

Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) / 10-Hydroxycamptothecin / Nanocarrier / Drug delivery

References

[1] Zhou S. B., Liao X. Y., Li X. H., Deng X. M., Li H. J. Control. Release, 2003, 86(2/3): 195.

[2] Lee S. J., Bae Y., Kataoka K., Kim D., Lee D. S., Kim S. C. Polym. J., 2008, 40(2): 171.

[3] Li Z. B., Loh X. J. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44(10): 2865.

[4] Joo M. K., Ko D. Y., Jeong S. J., Park M. H., Shinde U. P., Jeong B. Soft Matter, 2013, 9(33): 8014.

[5] Song X. L., You J., Wang J., Zhu A. P., Ji L. J., Guo R. Chem. Res. Chinese Universities, 2014, 30(2): 326.

[6] Nishiyama N., Kataoka K. Pharmacol. Ther., 2006, 112(3): 630.

[7] Penco M., Marcioni S., Ferruti P., D’Antone S., Deghenghi R. Biomaterials, 1996, 17(16): 1583.

[8] Kang N., Perron M. E., Prud’homme R. E., Zhang Y. B., Gaucher G., Leroux J. C. Nano Lett., 2005, 5(2): 315.

[9] Han S. C., Cheng Q., Wu Y. D., Zhou J. H., Long X. W., Wei T., Huang Y. Y., Zheng S. Q., Zhang J. H., Deng L. D., Wang X. X., Liang X. J., Cao H. Q., Liang Z. C., Dong A. J. Biomaterials, 2015, 48: 45.

[10] Wang Y., Wang X. Y., Lu Y. Y., Xu W. B., Guo Y., Xu L. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2013, 34(12): 2866.

[11] Ding G. B., Wang Y., Guo Y., Xu L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6(19): 16643.

[12] Zhang S. B., Qian X., Zhang D. H., Zhu J. M., Wu Y., Guo Y., Xu L. Chem. Res. Chinese Universities, 2016, 32(1): 149.

[13] Lee C. M., Choi Y. D., Huh E. J., Lee K. Y., Song H. C., Sun M. J., Jeong H. J., Cho C. S., Bom H. S. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm., 2005, 20(6): 620.

[14] Mi Y., Zhao J., Feng S. S. J. Control. Release, 2013, 172(1): E91.

[15] Mi Y., Liu X. L., Zhao J., Ding J., Feng S. S. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(30): 7519.

[16] Feng S. B., Nie L., Zou P., Suo J. P. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2015, 132(6): 41431.

[17] Siepmann J., Faisant N., Akiki J., Richard J., Benoit J. P. J. Control. Release, 2004, 96(1): 123.

[18] Alexis F., Pridgen E., Molnar L. K., Farokhzad O. C. Mol. Pharm., 2008, 5(4): 505.

[19] Zhu Z. X. Biomaterials, 2013, 34(38): 10238.

[20] Ding G. B., Liu H. Y., Lv Y. Y., Liu X. F., Guo Y., Sun C. K., Xu L. Chem.: Eur. J., 2012, 18(44): 14037.

[21] Makadia H. K., Siegel S. J. Polymers, 2011, 3(3): 1377.