Stability of pyrotechnic composition in flame detonator exposed to severe thermal stimulus
Jun Cheng , Nan Yan , Yaokun Ye , Fei Zheng
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5) : 814 -819.
Stability of pyrotechnic composition in flame detonator exposed to severe thermal stimulus
The stability of pyrotechnic composition used in flame detonator was studied at severe temperatures (–70―130 °C) for 5 d. For single N-LTNR(normal lead styphnate), camera was used to observe the shape and colour of N-LTNR in the DSC(differential scanning calorimetry) furnace during continuous heating and cooling processes. Based on the DSC-TGA(thermogravimetric analysis) results, it can be seen that when the temperature exceeded 110 °C, N-LTNR lost its crystal water, making the energetic material become darker in colour, smaller in dimension, lager in volume and lighter in weight(3.416%); when the temperature was below −40 °C, the phenomenon of sample broking, jumping and cracking happened. For the N-LTNR and Pb(N3)2(lead azide) double layers, the loss of N-LTNR’s crystal water at the temperature higher than 110 °C caused the hydrolysis reaction of Pb(N3)2, and the purity of Pb(N3)2 measured after the temperature cycling decreased from 98.6% to 95.26%. For the flame detonator, the height and diameter of the flame detonator were measured and no apparent changes of them were found. The p-t(pressure-time) test shows that the peak pressure was decreased by 3.9%. Therefore, the operating temperature of this flame detonator should be limited to −40–110 °C.
Normal lead styphnate / Lead azide / Flame detonator / Stability
| [1] |
Army Regulation 70-38, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation of Material for Extreme Climatic Conditions, Dept. Army, USA, 1979, 164 |
| [2] |
AMCP 706-17, Engineering Design Handbook, Explosive Trains, art One, Chapter 4, Environmental Response, Headquarters US Army Materiel Command, Washington, DC, 1974, 76 |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
AMCP 706-177, Engineering Design Handbook, Explosives Series, roperty of Explosives of Military Interest, Headquarters USArmy Materiel Command, Washington, DC, 1967, 95 |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
GJB5383, Test Methods of Sensitivity and Stability for Pyrotechnic- art 11: Test for Stability and Compatibility-DTA and DSC Method, 2005, 45 |
| [20] |
NATO STANAG 4147, Chemical Compatibility of Ammunition Components with Explosives and Propellants, Non-Nuclear Applications, USA, 1992, 33 |
| [21] |
ASTM E537-86, Standard Test Method for Assessing the Thermal Stability of Chemicals by Methods of Differential Thermal Analysis, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, USA, 1986, 94 |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
GJB737.1, Method of Loading Materials for Initiating Explosive Device Test, 1989, 51 |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
GJB772A, Explosive Test Method, 1997, 85 |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
MIL-STD-1751, Safety and Performance Tests for Qualification of Explosives, USA, 1982, 344 |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |