A surfactant-stable Bacillus pumilus K9 α-keratinase and its potential application in detergent industry

Jinsong Gong , Yue Wang , Dandan Zhang , Heng Li , Xiaomei Zhang , Rongxian Zhang , Zhenming Lu , Zhenghong Xu , Jinsong Shi

Chemical Research in Chinese Universities ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 91 -97.

PDF
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 91 -97. DOI: 10.1007/s40242-015-4351-8
Article

A surfactant-stable Bacillus pumilus K9 α-keratinase and its potential application in detergent industry

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

An α-keratinase producing strain was isolated with wool as the sole carbon and nitrogen source and identified as Bacillus pumilus K9. The major amino acids liberated from the keratin degradation of wool by B. pumilus K9 were glutamic acid and leucine. The α-keratinase was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity with a molecular weight of 32000. The purified enzyme exhibits an optimum activity at 60 °C and pH=9.0. It was stable at pH values between 8 and 11. Bacillas pumilus keratinase displays a high activity towards casein, keratin, wool and feather, which indicates its wide application range. The keratinase was completely inhibited by phenylmethyl-sulfonyl fluoride(PMSF) and β-mercaptoethanol, and moderately inhibited by ethylemediamine-tetraacetic acid(EDTA), suggesting it is a metallo-cysteine keratinase. This enzyme could remain stable that could even be promoted in the presence of surfactants, including sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS), Tween and Triton. And Tween 40 and Triton X-100 could substantially enhance the activity of the enzyme by 54% and 35%, respectively. It may indicate the prominent feature of the keratinase to tolerate surfactants. The enzymatic properties distinguish this keratinase from others in the literature. Furthermore, this enzyme is extremely stable in the presence of a commercially available detergent with 1% concentration. Detergents ARIEL, Bluemoon and WhiteCat can enhance the activity of the keratinase by 43.56%, 15.22%, and 22.48%, respectively.

Keywords

α-Keratinase / Bacillus pumilus K9 / Wool degradation / Surfactant stability / Detergent

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jinsong Gong, Yue Wang, Dandan Zhang, Heng Li, Xiaomei Zhang, Rongxian Zhang, Zhenming Lu, Zhenghong Xu, Jinsong Shi. A surfactant-stable Bacillus pumilus K9 α-keratinase and its potential application in detergent industry. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2015, 31(1): 91-97 DOI:10.1007/s40242-015-4351-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Riffel A, Brandelli A, Bellato C M, Souza G H, Eberlin M N, Tavares F C. J. Biotechnol., 2007, 128: 693.

[2]

Gupta R, Sharma R, Beg Q K. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 2013, 33: 216.

[3]

Brandelli A, Daroit D J, Riffel A. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2010, 85: 1735.

[4]

Anbu P, Gopinatha S C B, Hildaa A, Lakshmi P T, Annaduraic G. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2005, 36: 639.

[5]

Syed D G, Lee J C, Li W J, Kim C J, Agasar D. Bioresour. Technol., 2009, 100: 1868.

[6]

Farag A M, Hassan M A. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2004, 34: 85.

[7]

Lin X, Lee C G, Casale E S, Shih J C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1992, 58: 3271.

[8]

Bressollier P, Letourneau F, Urdaci M, Verneuil B. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1999, 65: 2570.

[9]

Cassano A, Drioli E, Molinari R, Grimaldi D, La C F, Rossi M. J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2000, 84: 205.

[10]

Abdel S, Manal M, Heba I, Nabil H, Mohamed H. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 2012, 70: 14.

[11]

Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. Brief. Bioinform., 2004, 5: 150.

[12]

Bradford M M. Anal. Biochem., 1976, 72: 248.

[13]

Yamamura S, Morita Y, Hasan Q, Rao S R, Murakami Y, Yokoyama K, Tamiya E. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2002, 93: 595.

[14]

Laemmli U K. Nature, 1970, 227: 680.

[15]

Fakhfakh-Zouari N, Hmidet N, Haddar A, Kanoun S, Nasri M. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 2010, 162: 329.

[16]

Suntornsuk W, Tongjun J, Onnim P, Oyama H, Ratanakanokchai K, Kusamran T, Oda K. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2005, 21: 1111.

[17]

Mitsuiki S, Ichikawa M, Oka T, Sakai M, Moriyama Y, Sameshma Y, Goto M, Furukawa K. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2004, 34: 482.

[18]

Bernal C, Cairo J, Coello N. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2006, 38: 49.

[19]

Tatineni R, Doddapaneni K K, Potumarthi R C, Vellanki R N, Kandathil M T, Kolli N, Mangamoori L N. Bioresource Technol., 2008, 99: 1596.

[20]

Cavello I A, Hours R A, Rojas N L, Cavalitto S F. Process Biochem., 2013, 48: 972.

[21]

Lv L X, Sim M H, Li Y D, Min J, Feng W H, Guan W J, Li Y Q. Process Biochem., 2010, 45: 1236.

[22]

Correa A P, Daroit D J, Brandelli A. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 2010, 64: 1.

[23]

Bernal C, Vidal L, Valdivieso E, Coello N. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2003, 19: 255.

[24]

Li X, Dong H, Zhang H. Chem. J. Chinese Universities, 2013, 34(12): 2861.

[25]

Cao L, Tan H, Liu Y, Xue X, Zhou S. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 2008, 46: 389.

[26]

Chen K N, Huang J C, Chung C I, Kuo W Y, Chen M J. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2011, 27: 349.

[27]

Santos R M D B, Firmino A A, de Sá C M, Felix C R. Curr. Microbiol., 1996, 33: 364.

[28]

Gradisar H, Friedrich J, Krizaj I, Jerala R. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2005, 71: 3420.

[29]

Paul T, Das A, Mandal A. J. Clean. Prod., 2014, 66: 672.

[30]

Rajput R, Sharma R, Gupta R. Enzyme Res., 2010, 2010: 132148.

[31]

Aravindhan R, Saravanabhavan S, Rao J R, Nair B U. J. Am. Leather Chem. As., 2004, 992: 53.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

111

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/