$\ell _0$ constraint,62P05" /> $\ell _0$ constraint" /> $\ell _0$ constraint,62P05" />

High-dimensional Portfolio Selection via an $\ell _0$-Constrained Regression

Siyu Wang , Peng Chen , Xueqin Wang

Communications in Mathematics and Statistics ›› : 1 -41.

PDF
Communications in Mathematics and Statistics ›› : 1 -41. DOI: 10.1007/s40304-025-00446-5
Article
research-article

High-dimensional Portfolio Selection via an $\ell _0$-Constrained Regression

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The Markowitz mean-variance model is a foundational tool for portfolio allocation, designed to minimize risk for a given return and budget constraint. However, traditional methods like the plug-in portfolio can be unstable, especially in high-dimensional settings where the number of assets significantly exceeds the sample size. To address this, we propose a new unconstrained regression model equivalent to the Markowitz mean-variance optimization problem but with an essential constraint: the sum of portfolio weights equals 1, incorporating the $\ell _0$ constraint to enhance sparsity. By estimating the mean and variance using the Fama-French Factor Model, we demonstrate the convergence of these parameters to their true values. Our sparse regression model asymptotically achieves minimum risk while satisfying maximum expected return and budget constraints under mild assumptions and effectively controls the number of selected assets. Simulations and empirical analyses highlight the efficacy of our approach in high-dimensional contexts, consistently selecting fewer stocks and often achieving higher returns and Sharpe ratios compared to traditional methods.

Keywords

High-dimensional portfolio selection / Mean-variance portfolio / Budget constraint / Fama-french factor model / $\ell _0$ constraint')">$\ell _0$ constraint / 62P05

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Siyu Wang, Peng Chen, Xueqin Wang. High-dimensional Portfolio Selection via an $\ell _0$-Constrained Regression. Communications in Mathematics and Statistics 1-41 DOI:10.1007/s40304-025-00446-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AoM, YingyingL, ZhengX. Approaching mean-variance efficiency for large portfolios. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2019, 32(7): 2890-2919

[2]

BaiZ, LiuH, WongW-K. Enhancement of the applicability of markowitz’s portfolio optimization by utilizing random matrix theory. Math. Finance Int. J. Math. Statist. Financ. Econom., 2009, 19(4): 639-667

[3]

BestMJ, GrauerRR. On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means: some analytical and computational results. Rev. Financ. Stud., 1991, 4(2): 315-342

[4]

BlackF, LittermanR. Asset allocation: combining investor views with market equilibrium. Goldman Sachs Fixed Income Res., 1990, 115: 7-18

[5]

Britten-JonesM. The sampling error in estimates of mean-variance efficient portfolio weights. J. Financ., 1999, 54(2): 655-671

[6]

BrodieJ, DaubechiesI, De MolC, GiannoneD, LorisI. Sparse and stable markowitz portfolios. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2009, 106(30): 12267-12272

[7]

CanerM, MedeirosM, VasconcelosGF. Sharpe ratio analysis in high dimensions: residual-based nodewise regression in factor models. J. Econom., 2023, 235(2): 393-417

[8]

Chatterjee, S.: Assumptionless consistency of the lasso. (2013) arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.5817

[9]

DeMiguelV, GarlappiL, UppalR. Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/n portfolio strategy?. Rev. Financ. stud., 2009, 22(5): 1915-1953

[10]

DuJ-H, GuoY, WangX. High-dimensional portfolio selection with cardinality constraints. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 2023, 118(542): 779-791

[11]

FanJ, FanY, LvJ. High dimensional covariance matrix estimation using a factor model. J. Econom., 2008, 147(1): 186-197

[12]

FanJ, LiaoY, MinchevaM. High dimensional covariance matrix estimation in approximate factor models. Ann. Stat., 2011, 3963320

[13]

FanJ, ZhangJ, YuK. Vast portfolio selection with gross-exposure constraints. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 2012, 107(498): 592-606

[14]

FanJ, LiaoY, MinchevaM. Large covariance estimation by thresholding principal orthogonal complements. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B (Statist. Methodol.), 2013, 75(4): 603-680

[15]

KanR, ZhouG. Optimal portfolio choice with parameter uncertainty. J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 2007, 42(3): 621-656

[16]

KremerPJ, LeeS, BogdanM, PaterliniS. Sparse portfolio selection via the sorted $\ell _1$-norm. J. Banking Finance, 2020, 110105687

[17]

LaiTL, XingH, ChenZ. Mean-variance portfolio optimization when means and covariances are unknown. Ann. Appl. Statist., 2011, 5(2A): 798-823

[18]

LedoitO, WolfM. Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. J. Empir. Financ., 2003, 10(5): 603-621

[19]

LedoitO, WolfM. Nonlinear shrinkage estimation of large-dimensional covariance matrices. Ann. Stat., 2012, 40(2): 1024-1060

[20]

LiG, HuangL, YangJ, ZhangW. A synthetic regression model for large portfolio allocation. J. Bus. Econom. Stat., 2021, 10: 1-13

[21]

MarkowitzHM. Portfolio selection. J. Finance, 1952, 77791

[22]

MichaudRO. The markowitz optimization enigma: is ‘optimized’optimal?. Financ. Anal. J., 1989, 45(1): 31-42

[23]

RobertE, RobertF, JeffreyR. Measuring and modeling execution cost and risk. J. Portfolio Manag, 2012, 38(2): 14-28

[24]

Wang, Z., Zhu, J., Chen, P., Peng, H., Zhang, X., Wang, A., Zheng, Y., Zhu, J., Wang, X.: skscope: Fast sparsity-constrained optimization in python. (2024) arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18540

[25]

WangW, LiW, ZhangN, LiuK. Portfolio formation with preselection using deep learning from long-term financial data. Expert Syst. Appl., 2020, 143113042

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(72171216)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

52

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/