Stage-wise performance evaluation of the Kalobe waste stabilization ponds in Mbeya, Tanzania: Efficiency in organic load and nutrient removal

Abstract

Globally, waste stabilization ponds (WSPs) in warm climates have demonstrated high treatment efficiencies for organic matter and suspended solids. This study evaluates the stage-wise performance and overall treatment efficiency of the Kalobe WSPs in Mbeya city, Tanzania, which treat approximately 15,000-18,000 m³/day of mixed domestic and industrial wastewater, compared with a design capacity of 28,800 m³/day. The system comprises anaerobic, facultative, and maturation ponds operating in parallel. Field sampling and laboratory analysis were conducted to determine pollutant concentrations across each treatment stage, focusing on key parameters including biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), 5-day, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSSs), ammonia, nitrite, and total dissolved solids (TDS). Results revealed that while the WSP system demonstrated high removal efficiencies for organic and solid pollutants, achieving reductions of 58.1% for BOD, 87.3% for COD, and 87.2% for TSS, its performance in nutrient and dissolved solids removal remained limited. Ammonia was moderately reduced (80.5%), whereas nitrite and TDS exhibited low removal efficiencies of 17.4% and 13.7%, respectively. The final effluent BOD (39 mg/L) and COD (78 mg/L) exceeded Tanzania’s national discharge standards, indicating partial non-compliance. The study also found that flow variations, particularly from industrial contributors such as Pepsi and Tanzania Breweries Limited, introduced intermittent hydraulic shocks, which may impair treatment consistency. The findings highlight the need for system upgrades, enhanced industrial pre-treatment enforcement, and the integration of post-treatment units to improve nutrient polishing. Overall, while Kalobe WSPs remain a cost-effective solution, strategic interventions are necessary to ensure sustained regulatory compliance and environmental protection.

Keywords

Waste stabilization ponds / Treatment efficiency / Organic load reduction / Nutrient removal / Anaerobic ponds / Facultative ponds / Maturation ponds

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Lima PDM, Lopes TADS, Queiroz LM, McConville JR. Resource-oriented sanitation: Identifying appropriate technologies and environmental gains by coupling Santiago software and life cycle assessment in a Brazilian case study. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 837:155777. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155777

[2] Manga M, Kolsky P, Rosenboom JW, et al. Public health performance of sanitation technologies in Tamil Nadu, India: Initial perspectives based on E. coli release. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022; 243:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.113987

[3] Mupinga RT, Mercer E, Rayavellore Suryakumar A, Pocock J, Septien S. Insight into the stickiness of faecal sludge from dry sanitation technologies: A path toward sustainable and efficient FSM via thermal processes. Results Eng. 2025; 26:105453. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105453

[4] Auma B, Musinguzi M, Ojuka, et al. Prevalence of diarrhea and water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) associated factors among children under five years in Lira City Northern Uganda: Community-based study. PLoS One. 2024; 19:e0305054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305054

[5] Mara DD, Mara D. Domestic Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries. 23rd ed. London: Earthscan; 2004.

[6] Mara D, Pearson H. Design Manual for Waste Stabilization Ponds in Mediterranean Countries. Dubai: Lagoon Technology International; 1998.

[7] Gopolang OP, Letshwenyo MW. Performance Evaluation of Waste Stabilisation Ponds. J Water Resour Prot. 2018; 10:1129-1147. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2018.1011067

[8] Achag B, Mouhanni H, Bendou A. Performance of municipal waste stabilization ponds in the Saharan desert (Morocco). J Water Clim Change. 2023; 14:1741-1761. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2023.339

[9] Cuff G, Turcios AE, Mohammad-Pajooh E, et al. High-rate anaerobic treatment of wastewater from soft drink industry: Methods, performance and experiences. J Environ Manage. 2018; 220:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.015

[10] Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA. Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: Applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manage. 2009; 90:652-659. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.001

[11] Shaheen MNF, Elmahdy EM, Rizk NM, et al. Evaluation of physical, chemical, and microbiological characteristics of waste stabilization ponds, Giza, Egypt. Environ Sci Eur. 2024; 36:170. doi: 10.1186/s12302-024-00965-y

[12] Kaseva ME, Mwegoha WJS, Kihampa C, et al. Performance of a waste stabilization pond system treating domestic and hospital wastewater and its implications to the aquatic environment-a case study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. J Build LAND Dev. 2018; 15(1-2):1-15.

[13] Mkude I, Saria J. Assessment of waste stabilization ponds (WSP) efficiency on wastewater treatment for agriculture reuse and other activities a case of Dodoma municipality, Tanzania. Ethiop J Environ Stud Manag. 2014; 7(3):298-304. doi: 10.4314/ejesm.v7i3.9

[14] Jiménez B. Irrigation in developing countries using wastewater. Int Rev Environ Strategies. 2006; 6(2):229-250.

[15] García J, Mujeriego R, Hernández-Mariné M. High rate algal pond operating strategies for urban wastewater nitrogen removal. J Appl Phycol. 2000; 12:331-339. doi: 10.1023/a:1008146421368

[16] Kilingo F, Bernard Z, Hong-Bin C. The analysis of Wastewater treatment system efficiencies in Kenya: A review paper. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2021; 11:204-215. doi: 10.29322/ijsrp.11.05.2021.p11322

[17] APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington DC: American Public Health Association; 1999.

[18] Olukanni DO, Ducoste JJ. Optimization of waste stabilization pond design for developing nations using computational fluid dynamics. Ecol Eng. 2011; 37:1878-1888. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.003

[19] Kum S, Rowles L. Wastewater reclamation and recycling. Envir Sci. 2023:1-37.doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.612

[20] Nkinda R, Ojija F, Bacaro G, Malunguja G. Land-use/ land-cover change in the Ngerengere River Catchment, Tanzania: Insights from 2004 to 2034. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2025:1-17. doi: 10.36922/ajwep025180137

[21] Sinn J, Lackner S. Enhancement of overloaded waste stabilization ponds using different pretreatment technologies: A comparative study from Namibia. J Water Reuse Desalination. 2020; 10:500-512. doi: 10.2166/wrd.2020.021

[22] Roebuck P, Kennedy K, Delatolla R. Ultrasonic pretreatment for anaerobic digestion of suspended and attached growth sludges. Water Qual Res J. 2019; 54(4):265-277. doi: 10.2166/wqrj.2019.039

[23] Kabeto SK, Tolera ST, Woldemichael ED. Evaluation of treatment efficiency of waste stabilization pond and its effluent toxicity in Hawassa University, Southern Ethiopia. East Afr J Health Biomed Sci. 2000; 4(1): 47-60.

[24] Johnson M, Camargo Valero MA, Mara DD. Maturation ponds, rock filters and reedbeds in the UK: Statistical analysis of winter performance. Water Sci Technol 2007; 55:135-142. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.364

[25] Xu S, Li Z, Yu S, et al. Microalgal-bacteria biofilm in wastewater treatment: Advantages, principles, and establishment. Water. 2024; 16:2561. doi: 10.3390/w16182561