Toward achieving zero-emissions in European Union countries: The contributions of trade and overseas direct investments in consumption-based carbon emissions

i

This article has been updated. A Correction to this article was published on .

i

The Original Article was published on

i

The Original Article was published on

i

This article has been updated

i

This article was retracted on

i

This article has been updated

Abstract

To achieve the ideal emissions reduction goals, several studies have suggested that carbon emissions should be examined in the framework of both territorial and consumption-based emissions. Nevertheless, the European Union (EU) SDGs targets aimed at mitigating carbon emissions based on the United Nation (UN) Kyoto Protocol structure, only appears to be concerned with the reduction of territorial-based emissions whilst emissions embodied on imported goods and services receive very little attention. To this end, this study examines the contributions of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) and disaggregate trade flows toward consumption-based sustainability in twenty-one (21) EU countries for the period 1995–2019. The study utilizes the STIRPAT model (Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology) and battery of advanced econometric techniques such as the Cross-Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lag (CS-ARDL), Common Correlated Effects (CCE) and the Cross-Sectional Distributed Lags (CS-DL) to examine the short-and long-run dynamics of OFDI and trade on consumption-based emissions. Finding reveals that EU exports and OFDI spillover reduces consumption-based emission, whilst import of goods and services promote emissions both in the short-run and long-run. This suggests that the progress report on carbon emissions reduction for most EU countries under the greenhouse gas accounting systems are merely carbon emissions outsourced to low-income countries whilst consumption-based emission continues to increase. These findings are robust to several econometric problems with set of policy implications provided for policymakers and governments to formulate more efficient strategies toward the mitigation of consumption-based carbon emissions among EU countries.

Keywords

consumption-based emission / production-based emission / carbon emission / import outward FDI / trade / CS-ARDL / STIRPAT / CS-DL / European Union

CHANGE HISTORY

A Correction to this paper has been published:
https://doi.org

The Retraction Note was updated to reflect reception of statements of disagreement from all authors.

This article has been retracted.Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail:
https://doi.org

References

[1] Spaiser V, Scott K, Owen A, et al. (2019) Consumption-based accounting of CO₂ emissions in the sustainable development Goals Agenda . Int J Sust Dev World 26: 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1559252

[2] Rahman MM, Ahmed R, Mashud AHM, et al. (2022) Consumption-based CO₂ emissions on sustainable development goals of SAARC Region . Sustainability 14: 1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031467

[3] European Commission (2011) A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0112:FIN:en:PDF.

[4] European Commission (2021) How has the EU progressed towards the sustainable development goals. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news.

[5] European Commission (2015) Intended nationally determined contribution of the EU and its member states, UNFCCC. Available from: http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published.

[6] Sandström V, Valinb H, Krisztin T, et al. (2018) The role of trade in the greenhouse gas footprints of EU diets. Glob Food Secur 19: 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.08.007

[7] Kastner T, Erb K H, Haberl H (2014) Rapid growth in agricultural trade: Effects on global area efficiency and the role of management. Env Res Lett 9: 034015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034015

[8] Becqué R, DubskY E, Hamza-Goodacre D, et al. (2017) Europe’s carbon loophole. Draft report for consultation. Available from: https://www.climateworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/EU-carbon-loophole_final-draft-for-consultation.pdf.

[9] Moran D, Hasanbeigi A, Springer C (2018) The carbon loophole in climate policy: Quantifying the embodied carbon in traded products. Available from: https://www.climateworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Carbon-Loophole-in-Climate-Policy-Final.pdf.

[10] Bloom NC, Genakos R, Sadun J, et al. (2012) Management practices across firms and countries. AMP 26: 12-33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0077

[11] Branstetter L (2006) Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? J Int Econ 68: 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.06.006

[12] Halicioglu F, Ketenci N (2016) The impact of international trade on environmental quality: The case of transition countries. Energy 109: 1130-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.013

[13] Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO₂ emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy . Renew Energ 94: 429-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078

[14] Liddle B (2018) Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus in Asia: A heterogeneous. common factor panel analysis. Sustainability 10: 3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103627

[15] Liddle B (2018) Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus. Energ Econ 69: 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.004

[16] Hasanov F, Liddle B, Mikayilov C (2018) The impact of international trade on CO₂ emissions in oil exporting countries: territory vs consumption emissions accounting . Energ Econ 74: 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.004

[17] Fernandez-Amador O, Francois J, Oberdabernig D, et al. (2017) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: An assessment based on production and consumption emission inventories. Ecol Econ 135: 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.007

[18] Knight K. Schor J (2014) Economic growth and climate change: A cross-national analysis of territorial and consumption-based carbon emissions in high-income countries. Sustainability 6: 3722-3731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6063722

[19] Marques A, Rodrigues J, Lenzen M, et al. (2012) Income-based environmental responsibility. Ecol Econ 84: 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.010

[20] Bhattacharya M, Inekwe J N, Sadorsky P (2020) Consumption-based and territory-based carbon emissions intensity: Determinants and forecasting using club convergence across countries. Energ Econ 86: 104632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104632

[21] Dong BM, Wang F, Guo YB (2016) The global EKCs. Int Rev Econ Financ 43: 210-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.02.010

[22] Gyam AB (2021) Consumption-based carbon emission and foreign direct investment in oil production sub-Sahara african countries: The role of natural resources and urbanization. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 13154-13166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16509-3

[23] Yang LG, Liu YN (2013) Can Japan’s outwards FDI reduce its CO₂ emissions? A new thought on polluter haven hypothesis. Adv Mater Res 807-809: 830-834. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.807-809.830

[24] Mohanty S, Sethi N (2021) The energy consumption-environmental quality nexus in BRICS countries: The role of outward foreign direct investment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 19714-19730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17180-4

[25] Borghesi S, Franco C, Marin G (2020) Outward foreign direct investment patterns of Italian firms in the European Union’s emission trading scheme. Scand J Econ 122: 219-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12323

[26] Zhang QX, Naqvi SAA, Shah SAR (2021) The contribution of outward foreign direct investment, human well-being, and technology toward a sustainable environment. Sustainability 13: 11430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011430

[27] Wood R, Stadler K, Simas M (2018) Growth in environmental footprints and environmental impacts embodied in trade: Resource efficiency indicators from EXIOBASE3. J Ind Ecol 22: 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12735

[28] Steen-Olsen K, Weinzettel J, Cranston G (2012) Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: Consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environ Sci Technol 46: 10883-10891. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301949t

[29] Karstensen J, Peters GP, Andrew RM (2018) Trends of the EU’s territorial and consumption-based emissions from 1990 to 2016. Climatic Change 151: 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2296-x

[30] Fezzigna P, Borghesi S, Caro D (2019) Revising emission responsibilities through consumption-based accounting: A european and post-brexit perspective. Sustainability 11: 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020488

[31] Liobikien G, Dagiliut R (2016) The relationship between economic and carbon footprint changes in EU: The achievements of the EU sustainable consumption and production policy implementation. Environ Sci Policy 61: 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.017

[32] Valodka I, Snieska V, Mihi-Ramirez A (2020) Impact of the international trade on the EU clothing industry carbon emissions. Inzinerine Ekon-Eng Econ 31: 314-322. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.3.25012

[33] Friedlingstein P, O’Sullivan M, Jone MW et al. (2020) Supplemental data of the Global carbon Budget 2020, Carbon Portal. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2020.

[34] World bank (2020) World bank indicators, World bank group Archives, Washington, D.C. United States. Available from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.

[35] Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171: 1212-1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212

[36] Commoner B, Corr M, Stamler PJ (1971) The causes of pollution. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 13: 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1971.9930577

[37] York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) Footprints on the earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. Am Sociol Rev 68: 279-300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519769

[38] Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecol Rev 1: 277-300.

[39] Phillips P, Sul D (2003) Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Econometrics J 6: 217-259. http://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00108

[40] Jalili Z, Bishak MRS, Azad MAM, et al. (2019) Resource economic growth nexus, role of governance, financial development, globalization, and war: A dynamic approach. J Econ Integr 34: 520-545.

[41] Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of panel data , Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

[42] Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_1229.html.

[43] Swamy PAVB (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38: 311-323.

[44] Pesaran MH, Yamagata TY (2008) Testing Slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econometrics 142: 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010

[45] Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econometrics 115: 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

[46] Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econometrics 108: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7

[47] Bhattacharya M, Paramati SR, Ozturk I, et al. (2016) The effect of renewable energy utilization on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries. Appl Energ 162: 733-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.104

[48] Paramati SR, Ummalla M, Apergis N (2016) The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies. Energ Econ 56: 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.008

[49] Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. J Appl Econ 22: 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951

[50] Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69: 709-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x

[51] Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econometrics 188: 393-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007

[52] Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data , Cambridge: MIT Press.

[53] Azam M, Haseeb M (2021) Determinants of foreign direct investment in BRICS- does renewable and non-renewable energy matter? Energ Strateg Rev 35: 100638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100638

[54] Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74: 967-1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x

[55] Liu Z, Pang P, Fang W, et al. (2022) Dynamic common correlated effects of pandemic uncertainty on environmental quality: Fresh insights from East-Asia and Pacific countries. Air Qual Atmos Health 15: 1395-1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01164-5

[56] Hussain M, Khan JA (2021) The nexus of environment-related technologies and consumption-based carbon emissions in top five emitters: Empirical analysis through dynamic common correlated effects estimator. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15333-z

[57] Chaudhry IS, Ali S, Bhatti SH, et al. (2021) Dynamic common correlated effects of technological innovations and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from East-Asia and Pacific countries. Environ Sci Policy 124: 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.007

[58] Ditzen J (2018) Estimating long-run effects in models with cross-sectional dependence using xtdcce2. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/bzn/wpaper/bemps81.html.

[59] Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran MH, et al. (2013) Debt, inflation and growth robust estimation of long-run effects in dynamic panel data models. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/feddgw/162.html.

[60] De Vita G, Li C, Luo Y (2021) The inward FDI-Energy intensity nexus in OECD countries: A sectoral R&D threshold analysis. J Environ Manag 287: 112290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112290

[61] Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis, Econometric Theory, 20: 597-625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073

[62] Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 61: 653-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653

[63] Leitão NC, Balogh JM (2020) The impact of intra-industry trade on carbon dioxide emissions: The case of the EU. Agric Econ 66: 203-214. https://doi.org/10.17221/312/2019-AGRICECON

[64] Yasmeen R, Li Y, Hafeez M, et al. (2018) The trade-environment nexus in light of governance: A global potential. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 34360-34379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3390-3

[65] Weber H, Sciubba JD (2019) The effect of population growth on the environment: Evidence from european regions. Eur J Population 35: 379-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9486-0

[66] Shi A (2013) The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975-1996: Evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecol Econ 44: 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00223-9

[67] Bongaarts J (1992) Population growth and global warming. Population Dev Rev 18: 299-319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973681

[68] Liddle B (2013) Population, affluence, and environmental impact across development: Evidence from panel cointegration modeling. Environ Model Software 40: 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.002

[69] MacKellar L, Lutz W, Prinz C, et al. (1995) Population, households and CO₂ emissions . Population Dev Rev 21: 849-865. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137777