BGDNet: boundary-guided dual-backbone encoder–decoder network for dermoscopic lesion segmentation
Jiayu Zhang , Haiyang Liu , Ying Ye , Xiaoming Huang
AIMS Bioengineering ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 394 -417.
Accurate segmentation of dermoscopic lesions is essential for computer-aided melanoma assessment, but reliable delineation remains challenging because lesions often exhibit irregular shapes, low contrast, and ambiguous boundaries. This study aimed to improve both lesion-region segmentation and contour localization by better coordinating complementary local and global image representations. We developed BGDNet, a boundary-guided dual-backbone encoder–decoder network that combines TransXNet and Swin Transformer. The model integrates local structural information with long- range contextual information and uses boundary priors to guide feature interaction. Its performance was evaluated on the ISIC-2016, ISIC-2018, and PH2 datasets and compared with representative convolutional, Transformer-based, and hybrid segmentation methods using both region-based and boundary-sensitive metrics. On ISIC-2018, BGDNet achieved an intersection over union (IoU) of 0.8813 ± 0.0014, a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.9330 ± 0.0009, a 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) of 5.84 ± 0.11 pixels, an average surface distance (ASD) of 1.34 ± 0.03 pixels, and a boundary F-score at a 2-pixel tolerance (BF@2) of 0.868 ± 0.003. A recall (sensitivity) of 0.9602 ± 0.0021 and a specificity of 0.9847±0.0007 further characterize foreground–background behavior under class imbalance. Additional in-dataset and cross-dataset experiments, together with component-wise ablation and stage-wise boundary-prior visualization, provide complementary evidence for the model design. These findings show that boundary-guided interaction between complementary encoders can improve both lesion overlap and contour accuracy, particularly for lesions with irregular or weakly defined margins. BGDNet therefore provides a promising framework for accurate dermoscopic lesion segmentation.
dermoscopic image segmentation / skin lesion segmentation / boundary-aware segmentation / dual-backbone network / transformer-based models
| [1] |
Sung H, Ferlay J, |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U—Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, Medical Image Computing and Computer—Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015, Cham: Springer, 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978—3—319—24574—4_28 |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
Hatamizadeh A, Tang Y, Nath V, |
| [16] |
Kervadec H, Bouchtiba J, Desrosiers C, |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Li G, Huang Q, Wang W, |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Fang H, Sun Y, Zhang S, |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
Kuang H, Wang Y, Liang Y, |
| [34] |
Fang H, Zhang S, Teng X, |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Mendonc¸a T, Ferreira PM, Marques JS, |
| [44] |
Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |