PDF
Abstract
Soil permeability is a critical parameter that dictates the movement of water through soil, and it impacts processes such as seepage, erosion, slope stability, foundation design, groundwater contamination, and various engineering applications. This study investigates the permeability of soil amended with waste foundry sand (WFS) at a replacement level of 10%. Permeability measurements are conducted for three distinct relative densities, spanning from 65% to 85%. The dataset compiled from these measurements is employed to develop ensemble artificial intelligence (AI) models. Specifically, four regressor AI models are considered: Nearest Neighbor (NNR), Decision Tree (DTR), Random Forest (RFR) and Support Vector Machine (SVR). These models are enhanced with four distinct base learners: Gradient Boosting (GB), Stacking Regressor (SR), AdaBoost Regressor (ADR), and XGBoost (XGB). The input parameters include fraction of base sand (BS), fraction of waste foundry sand (WFS), relative density (RD), duration of flow (T), quantity of flow (Q) and permeability (k), totalling 165 data points. Through comparative analysis, the Gradient Boost with Decision Tree (GB-DTR) model is found to be best-performed model, with R2 = 0.9919. Sensitivity analysis reveals that Q is the most influential input parameter in predicting soil permeability.
Keywords
Permeability
/
Ensemble models
/
Waste foundry sand
/
AI models
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Ankit Kumar, Rohit Ahuja.
Prediction of permeability of amended soil using ensembled artificial intelligence models.
AI in Civil Engineering, 2025, 4(1): 9 DOI:10.1007/s43503-025-00052-y
| [1] |
AbdullahGMS, AhmadM, BaburM, et al. . Boosting-based ensemble machine learning models for predicting unconfined compressive strength of geopolymer stabilized clayey soil. Science and Reports, 2024, 14: 2323.
|
| [2] |
AhmadM, KeawsawasvongS, Bin IbrahimMR, et al. . Novel approach to predicting soil permeability coefficient using Gaussian process regression. Sustainability, 2022, 14: 8781.
|
| [3] |
AsselmanA, KhaldiM, AammouS. Enhancing the prediction of student performance based on the machine learning XGBoost algorithm. Interactive Learning Environments, 2023, 31: 3360-3379.
|
| [4] |
ASTM D2434 (2019) Standard Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils. ASTM International West Conshohocken: PA
|
| [5] |
BabbarSM, LauCY, ThangKF. Long term solar power generation prediction using adaboost as a hybrid of linear and non-linear machine learning model. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2021.
|
| [6] |
BaghbaniA, ChoudhuryT, CostaS, ReinerJ. Application of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Earth-Science Reviews, 2022, 228. 103991
|
| [7] |
BahmedIT, KhattiJ, GroverKS. Hybrid soft computing models for predicting unconfined compressive strength of lime stabilized soil using strength property of virgin cohesive soil. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2024, 83: 46.
|
| [8] |
BentéjacC, CsörgőA, Martínez-MuñozG. A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2021, 54: 1937-1967.
|
| [9] |
BowlesJEEngineering Properties of Soils and Their Measurement, 1992New YorkMcGraw-Hill
|
| [10] |
CaoY, MiaoQ-G, LiuJ-C, GaoL. Advance and prospects of AdaBoost algorithm. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39: 745-758.
|
| [11] |
ChenT, GuestrinCXGBoost, 2016New York, NY, USAACM.
|
| [12] |
Cornell CALS National Good Agricultural Practices Program- Soil Amendments
|
| [13] |
ElhakimAF. Estimation of soil permeability. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2016, 55: 2631-2638.
|
| [14] |
FushikiT. Estimation of prediction error by using K-fold cross-validation. Statistics and Computing, 2011, 21: 137-146.
|
| [15] |
HassanM, BeshrE. Predicting soil cone index and assessing suitability for wind and solar farm development in using machine learning techniques. Science and Reports, 2024, 14: 2924.
|
| [16] |
KhattiJ, GroverKS. Prediction of compaction parameters of compacted soil using LSSVM, LSTM, LSBoostRF, and ANN. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2023, 8: 76.
|
| [17] |
KoopialipoorM, AsterisPG, Salih MohammedA, et al. . Introducing stacking machine learning approaches for the prediction of rock deformation. Transportation Geotechnics, 2022, 34. 100756
|
| [18] |
KumarA, PariharA. Impact of waste foundry sand on drainage behavior of sandy soil: An experimental and machine learning study. AI in Civil Engineering, 2024, 3: 1.
|
| [19] |
LeeS-M, LeeS-J. Landslide susceptibility assessment of South Korea using stacking ensemble machine learning. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 2024, 11: 7.
|
| [20] |
MitchellKJ, SogaKFundamentals of soil behavior, 2005New YorkJohn Wiley Sons
|
| [21] |
MohammedA, KoraR. A comprehensive review on ensemble deep learning: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 2023, 35: 757-774.
|
| [22] |
MuslehDA, OlatunjiSO, AlmajedAA, et al. . Ensemble learning based sustainable approach to carbonate reservoirs permeability prediction. Sustainability, 2023, 15: 14403.
|
| [23] |
NatekinA, KnollA. Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 2013.
|
| [24] |
OnyeloweKC, MoghalAAB, EbidA, et al. . Estimating the strength of soil stabilized with cement and lime at optimal compaction using ensemble-based multiple machine learning. Science and Reports, 2024, 14: 15308.
|
| [25] |
SinghB, SihagP, PandhianiSM, et al. . Estimation of permeability of soil using easy measured soil parameters: Assessing the artificial intelligence-based models. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2021, 27: 38-48.
|
| [26] |
SinghVK, KumarD, KashyapPS, et al. . Modelling of soil permeability using different data driven algorithms based on physical properties of soil. J Hydrol (Amst), 2020, 580. 124223
|
| [27] |
SinhaA, JhaAK. Variation in coefficient of permeability of soil with the variation of temperature at prominent locations in India throughout a year. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 2022.
|
| [28] |
TaffeseWZ, AbegazKA. Prediction of compaction and strength properties of amended soil using machine learning. Buildings, 2022, 12: 613.
|
| [29] |
TalamkhaniS. Machine learning-based prediction of unconfined compressive strength of sands treated by microbially-induced calcite precipitation (MICP): A gradient boosting approach and correlation analysis. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2023, 2023: 1-20.
|
| [30] |
TerzaghiK, PeckRBSoil Mechanics Engineering Practice, 19672NY, USANew York
|
| [31] |
TranVQ. Predicting and investigating the permeability coefficient of soil with aided single machine learning algorithm. Complexity, 2022, 2022: 1-18.
|
| [32] |
UthayakumarA, MohanMP, KhooEH, et al. . Machine learning models for enhanced estimation of soil moisture using wideband radar sensor. Sensors, 2022, 22: 5810.
|
| [33] |
ZhangR, ZhangS. Coefficient of permeability prediction of soils using gene expression programming. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 128. 107504
|
| [34] |
ZhangW, WuC, ZhongH, et al. . Prediction of undrained shear strength using extreme gradient boosting and random forest based on Bayesian optimization. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12: 469-477.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
The Author(s)