Tsunami loads on bridge bents: pier interaction and dynamic amplification

Abstract

As natural hazards continue to intensify, tsunami waves have become one of the most destructive events affecting transportation infrastructure, especially bridges. Although structural engineering research has traditionally been concentrated on seismic loading and earthquake-resistant bridge design, tsunami-induced forces can also significantly impair bridge serviceability and seismic performance, representing a serious risk to structural safety. This study examined the dynamic forces imposed by tsunami waves on bridge piers through combined hydrodynamic and structural analyses, aiming to evaluate the influence of load dynamics on the system response. The investigation first compared the total hydrodynamic forces acting on a multi-column bridge bent with those on a single-column pier using hydrodynamic simulations. The influence of column spacing on the resulting overturning moment was then assessed. In addition, the characteristics of tsunami wave loading were further investigated through structural analyses incorporating soil–structure interaction of the pier-foundation-soil system. The results demonstrated the significant influence that column pier arrangement has on the hydrodynamic forces acting on bridge bents, with the multi-column bent resulting in an increase by at least 25% in the total force transmitted to the foundation compared with the single-column pier. Furthermore, the structural analysis demonstrated that neglecting the dynamic component of tsunami-induced loading led to a significant underestimation of its damaging potential. To address this issue, a dynamic amplification factor associated with the surge Froude number was proposed, to estimate the dynamic response of bridge piers from static analysis. This enables consideration of the dynamic effects into existing hydrodynamic load formulations in design codes. The proposed amplification factor ranged from 1.0 to 2.0, highlighting its dependence on flow conditions and its significance for practical design.

Keywords

Tsunami-induced loading / Bridge piers / Hydrodynamic–structural interaction / Dynamic amplification / Overturning moment

References

[1] Adekoya OO, Erduran KS. Combined influence of pier geometry and downstream bed slope on tsunami-surge impact forces. Phys Fluids, 2026, 38(115154

[2] Anisha A, Jacob A, Davis R, Mangalathu S. Fragility functions for highway RC bridge under various flood scenarios. Eng Struct, 2022, 260: 114244

[3] Argyroudis SA, Mitoulis SA. Vulnerability of bridges to individual and multiple hazards- floods and earthquakes. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 2021, 210: 107564

[4] Ario I, Yamashita T, Tsubaki R, Kawamura S, Uchida T, Watanabe G, Fujiwara A. Investigation of bridge collapse phenomena due to heavy rain floods: structural, Hydraulic, and hydrological analysis. J Bridge Eng, 2022, 27(9): 04022073

[5] Arnason H, Petroff C, Yeh H. Tsunami bore impingement onto a vertical column. J Disaster Res, 2009, 4(6): 391-403

[6] ASCE/SEI (2022) Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other Structures. pp 7–22

[7] Carey TJ, Mason HB, Barbosa AR, Scott MH. Multihazard earthquake and tsunami effects on soil–foundation–bridge systems. J Bridge Eng, 2019, 24(4): 04019004

[8] Cengel YA, Cimbala JM. Penn Plaza, 2018, 4th, New York, NY McGraw-Hill Education, 2

[9] Chanson H. Environmental Hydraulics for Open channel flows, 2004, 1stElsevier Butterworth-Heinemann

[10] Chanson H. The Hydraulics of Open channel flow: an Introduction: basic principles, sediment motion, Hydraulic modelling, design of Hydraulic Structures, 2004, SecondElsevier Ltd

[11] Chanson H. Tsunami Surges on dry Coastal plains: application of dam break wave equations. Coastal Eng J, 2006, 48(4): 355-370

[12] Crespo AJ, Gómez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple RA. Modeling dam break behavior over a wet bed by a SPH technique. J Waterw, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng, 2008, 134(6): 313-320

[13] CSA S6: 19 (2019) Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code

[14] EN 1991–1 (2005) Eurocode, 1: actions on Structures. Part 1-6. Gener Actions; Actions Dur Execution

[15] Erduran KS, Adekoya OO, Ünal U, Akansu YE. Dam-break-induced shock wave characteristic and bridge pier shape effects on shock wave force. Phys Fluids, 2025, 37(6): 67142

[16] Farvizi F, Melville BW, Shamseldin AY, Shafiei S, Hendi E. Experimental investigation of tsunami bore-induced forces and pressures on skewed box section bridges. Ocean Eng, 2021, 224: 108730

[17] Garoosi F, Nicole Mellado-Cusicahua A, Shademani M, Shakibaeinia A. Experimental and numerical investigations of dam break flow over dry and wet beds. Int J Mech Sci, 2022, 215: 106946

[18] Global Tsunami Model Network (2026) https://www.globaltsunamimodel.org/

[19] Harish S., Sriram V., Schüttrumpf Holger, Sannasiraj S.A.. Flow-structure interference effects with the surrounding structure in the choked quasi-steady condition of tsunami: Comparison with traditional obstruction approach. Applied Ocean Research, 2022, 126: 103255

[20] Hirt CW (2003) Modeling turbulent entrainment of air at a free surface

[21] Kazantzi AK, Bakalis K, Mitoulis SA. Flood fragility assessment of bridges—unified framework. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 2025, 262: 111196

[22] Lee G, Mohan S, Huang C, Fard B (2013) Technical report MCEER-13-008 1980–2012. A Study of US Bridge Failures

[23] Lees A (2016) Geotechnical finite element analysis: a practical guide. In: Geotechnical finite element analysis. ICE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1680/GFEA.60876

[24] Leonard LJ, Rogers GC, Mazzotti S. Tsunami hazard assessment of Canada. Nat Hazards, 2014, 70(1): 237-274

[25] Lewis NS, Lehman DE, Motley MR, Arduino P, Roeder CW, Pyke CN, Sullivan, Sullivan KP. Integrated study of existing tsunami design standards. J Struct Eng, 2022, 148(12): 04022200

[26] Liu S, Nistor I, Mohammadian A, Azimi AH (2022) Experimental and numerical investigation of Beach slope effects on the hydrodynamic loading of tsunami-like Surges on a vertical wall. JMSE 2022, vol. 10, 10, Page 1580, 11):1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/JMSE10111580

[27] Liu Shengnan, Ong Muk Chen, Obhrai Charlotte, Gatin Inno, Vukčević Vuko. Influences of free surface jump conditions and different k−ω SST turbulence models on breaking wave modelling. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 217: 107746

[28] Loli M, Mitoulis SA, Tsatsis A, Manousakis J, Kourkoulis R, Zekkos D. Flood characterization based on forensic analysis of bridge collapse using UAV reconnaissance and CFD simulations. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 822: 153661

[29] Maleki M, Mohammad Nezhad H, Mir Mohammad Hosseini SM (2025) A numerical study of site effect and dynamic response of staged excavation supported by soil nail walls. Sci Rep 1(15(1):20521–. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05510-2

[30] McFall BC, Fritz HM (2016) Physical modelling of tsunamis generated by three-dimensional deformable granular landslides on planar and conical island slopes. In Proceedings. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences/The Royal Society, vol 472. pp 2188). https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPA.2016.0052

[31] Moosavian SMH, Karimpour S, Pantazopoulou SJ. Comparative analysis of hydrodynamic loads on bridge piers: assessing standards through numerical modeling. Can J Civ Eng, 2024, 52(11): 2049-2069

[32] Mu D, Chen L, Ning D. Modeling impact load on a vertical cylinder in dam-break flows. JMSE, 2023, 11(5): 932

[33] Nikolaidis D, Tastani S, Pantazopoulou S (2022) Arch stone bridges: procedures for evaluation of structural integrity. Int J Architectural Heritage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2022.2042624

[34] OpenFoam F (2018) OpenFOAM: the open source CFD toolbox (Version 6, available at: OpenFOAM Foundation. https://www.openfoam.org

[35] Peng L, Zhang T, Rong Y, Hu C, Feng P. Numerical investigation of the impact of a dam-break induced flood on a structure. Ocean Eng, 2021, 223: 108669

[36] Pope SB. Ten Questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New J Phys, 2004, 6(1): 35

[37] Qin S. Recent hydraulic bridge failures in China: review and discussion. Rdlc, 2022, 21(2): 193-203

[38] Qu Sen, Liu Shengnan, Ong Muk Chen. An evaluation of different RANS turbulence models for simulating breaking waves past a vertical cylinder. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 234: 109195

[39] Rajaie M, Azimi AH, Nistor I, Rennie CD. Experimental investigations on hydrodynamic characteristics of tsunami-like Hydraulic bores impacting a Square structure. J Hydraul Eng, 2022, 148(3): 04021061

[40] Ravindar R, Sriram V (2021) Impact pressure and forces on a vertical wall with different types of parapet. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 147(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000635

[41] Requena-Garcia-Cruz MV, Bento R, Durand-Neyra P, Morales-Esteban A. Analysis of the soil structure-interaction effects on the seismic vulnerability of mid-rise RC buildings in Lisbon. Structures, 2022, 38: 599-617

[42] Stoker JJ (2011) Water waves: the mathematical theory with applications. In: Water waves: the mathematical theory with applications. wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118033159

[43] Tan T, Ma Y, Zhang J, Niu X, Chang KA. Experimental study on flow kinematics of dam-break induced surge impacting onto a vertical wall. Phys Fluids, 2023, 35(2): 25127

[44] Tsunami hazard assessment of Canada (2026). https://osdp-psdo.canada.ca/dp/en/search/metadata/NRCAN-GEOSCAN-1-292775

[45] Venkateshwaran A, Li Z, Karimpour S. Turbulent characteristics and anisotropy in breaking surge waves: a numerical study. Phys Fluids, 2023, 35(1): 15132

[46] Xie P, Chu VH. The forces of tsunami waves on a vertical wall and on a structure of finite width. Coastal Eng, 2019, 149: 65-80

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)