Data-driven nonlinear shear force–slip modeling for automated optimization of grouped studs in steel–precast concrete composite bridges

Abstract

In composite bridges incorporating precast concrete components, the behavior of grouped stud connectors becomes increasingly complex due to nonlinear interactions governed by additional design variables such as stud group arrangement and the geometric and material characteristics of cast-in-place concrete within pockets and surrounding precast regions. This study develops a novel and interpretable nonlinear shear force–slip model using explicit data-driven learning techniques, providing an automated optimal design tool for grouped stud connectors. An experimental database comprising 249 push-out tests with 19 input parameters was compiled from the literature to support model development and validation. Existing design codes were evaluated and shown to exhibit limited predictive accuracy, particularly for slip-related behavior. New data-driven predictive equations were derived and integrated into a continuous nonlinear shear force–slip relationship. The proposed models achieve correlation coefficients exceeding 0.86 for shear capacity and 0.7 for critical slip values prediction, substantially outperforming existing approaches. A practical case study conducted under realistic design constraints demonstrates that embedding the proposed model within an automated optimization framework enables effective optimization of grouped stud configurations, increasing total shear capacity within concrete pockets by up to 50% compared with non-optimized designs.

Keywords

Composite structures / Precast concrete / Grouped studs / Shear capacity / Shear force – slip relationship / Data-driven learning / Push-out tests

References

[1] Aashto L. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 2012, Washington, DC, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

[2] Akinori Nakajima YO, Duong NV (2015) Experimental study on detailed behavior of composite girder with precast slab and grouped studs. J Struct Eng JSCE 61A:788–897

[3] An L, Cederwall K. Push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete. J Constr Steel Res, 1996, 36(115-29

[4] Avci-Karatas C. Application of machine learning in prediction of shear capacity of headed steel studs in steel–concrete composite structures. Int J Steel Struct, 2022, 22(2): 539-556

[5] Bao Y, Sun H, Xu Y, Guan X, Pan Q, Liu D. Recent advances in structural health diagnosis: a machine learning perspective. Adv Bridge Eng, 2025, 6(1): 1-28

[6] Cao J, Shao X. Finite element analysis of headed studs embedded in thin UHPC. J Constr Steel Res, 2019, 161: 355-368

[7] Chen J, et al.. Shearing performances of the detachable prefabricated composite beams with different types of connectors. Struct Concr, 2024, 25(4): 2695-2713

[8] C Code (2017) Standard for design of steel structures. GB50017–2017, Beijing, China

[9] Eurocode 4 (2005) Design of composite steel and concrete structure - Part 2: General rules and rules for bridge. EN 1994-2:2005

[10] Ding J, Zhu J, Kang J, Wang X. Experimental study on grouped stud shear connectors in precast steel-UHPC composite bridge. Eng Struct, 2021, 242 112479

[11] Ding J, Zhu J, Shi T. Performance of grouped stud connectors in precast steel-UHPC composite bridges under combined shear and tension loads. Eng Struct, 2023, 277 115470

[12] Dönmez AA. Size effect on the shear capacity of headed studs. Adv Struct Eng, 2021, 24(4): 815-826

[13] ECF Standardization (2004) Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures—Part 1.1: general rules and rules for buildings, ed

[14] Fanaie N, Esfahani FG, Soroushnia S. Analytical study of composite beams with different arrangements of channel shear connectors. Steel Compos Struct, 2015, 19(2): 485-501

[15] S Fang et al (2024) Numerical and theoretical investigation on interfacial shear performance of prefabricated steel–UHPC composite beams with grouped stud–UHPC pocket connections. Structures 69:107300. Elsevier

[16] Fang Z, Jiang H, Chen G, Dong X, Shao T. Behavior of grouped stud shear connectors between precast high-strength concrete slabs and steel beams. Steel Compos Struct, 2020, 34(6): 837-851

[17] Fang Z, Fang H, Huang J, Jiang H, Chen G. Static behavior of grouped stud shear connectors in steel–precast UHPC composite structures containing thin full-depth slabs. Eng Struct, 2022, 252 113484

[18] Fang Z, Fang S, Liu F. Experimental and numerical study on the shear performance of short stud shear connectors in steel–UHPC composite beams. Buildings, 2022, 12(4): 418

[19] Fang S, et al.. Effects of stud aspect ratio and cover thickness on push-out performance of thin full-depth precast UHPC slabs with grouped short studs: experimental evaluation and design considerations. J Build Eng, 2023, 67 105910

[20] Fang Z, et al.. Grouped rubber-sleeved studs–UHPC pocket connections in prefabricated steel–UHPC composite beams: shear performance under monotonic and cyclic loadings. Eng Struct, 2024, 305 117781

[21] Feng C, Long Z, Su M, Xu L, Zhao L, Han Y. A physics-informed deep learning approach for combined cycle fatigue life prediction. J Constr Steel Res, 2024, 222 109000

[22] M Gyawali, K Sennah, M Ahmed, A Hamoda (2024) Experimental study of static and fatigue push-out test on headed stud shear connectors in UHPC composite steel beams. Structures 70:107923. Elsevier

[23] M Hallin (2014) Gauss–Markov theorem in statistics. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online

[24] Hansen BE. A modern Gauss–Markov theorem. Econometrica, 2022, 90(3): 1283-1294

[25] Hu Y, Yin H, Ding X, Li S, Wang J. Shear behavior of large stud shear connectors embedded in ultra-high-performance concrete. Adv Struct Eng, 2020, 23(16): 3401-3414

[26] Z Huang et al (2026) Experimental and numerical study on the shear-slip behavior of high-strength bolt shear connectors in prefabricated composite beams. Structures 84:110980. Elsevier

[27] Japan Society of Civil Engineers (2007) Standard specifications for steel and composite structures. JSCE Tokyo, Japan

[28] Jiang H, et al.. Rapid hardening high performance concrete (RHHPC) for bridge expansion joints: from material properties to interfacial shear performance. Constr Build Mater, 2025, 458 139638

[29] Tagawa Y, Hiragi H, Ogata M, Inoue K, Matui S (1995) An Investigation on Standard Push-Out Test Method for Headed Stud Shear Connectors. IEEE J Solid-state Circuits : 47-60

[30] JSCE (2014) Japan Society of Civil Engineers - Standard specifications for hybrid structures 2014. ed: Maruzen Tokyo

[31] Kruszewski D, Wille K, Zaghi AE. Push-out behavior of headed shear studs welded on thin plates and embedded in UHPC. Eng Struct, 2018, 173: 429-441

[32] Lee KC, Abbas HH, Ramey GE. Review of current AASHTO fatigue design specifications for stud shear connectors. Structures Congress, 2010, 2010: 310-321

[33] Li M, Shao X, Cao JH, He G, Chen Y, Wang X. Performance of experimental and theoretical analysis on shear short headed studs embedded in UHPC. China J Highw Transp, 2021, 34(8): 191

[34] Li Y, et al.. Shear behavior of short studs in steel-thin ultrahigh-performance concrete composite structures. Case Stud Constr Mater, 2023, 19e02423

[35] Liu Y, Zhang Q, Bao Y, Bu Y. Static and fatigue push-out tests of short headed shear studs embedded in Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC). Eng Struct, 2019, 182: 29-38

[36] Liu K, Liang X, Zhao W, Cao X, Pei H. Prediction of soil conditioner dosages for shield tunneling in sandy soil based on machine learning. Case Stud Constr Mater, 2025

[37] Luo Y, Hoki K, Hayashi K, Nakashima M. Behavior and strength of headed stud–SFRCC shear connection. I: Experimental study. J Struct Eng, 2016, 142(2 04015112

[38] Mo Z, Qiu J, Xu H, Xu L, Hu Y. Flexural and longitudinal shear performance of precast lightweight steel–ultra-high performance concrete composite beam. Front Struct Civ Eng, 2023, 17(5): 704-721

[39] Nakajima A, Yaginuma D, Inui S, Nguyen MH, Fujikura S. A study on shear connector arrangement of non-composite girder with precast concrete slab. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE)), 2021, 77(2): 319-332

[40] Nguyen MH, Phan HN. A Bayesian-optimized neural network model for shear capacity of a perfobond strip connector in various types of composite structures. Adv Steel Constr, 2024, 20(4): 376-384

[41] Nguyen MH, Phan HN, Do VH, Huynh PN. An experiment-based nonlinear model of shear force-slip relationship for perfobond strips in an unreinforced narrow joint with high-strength steel fiber mortar. Case Stud Constr Mater, 2023, 18e02092

[42] Nguyen MH, Pham VN, Phan HN, Do VH, Huynh PN, Mai TTT (2025) Gene‐expression programming‐based models for comprehensive evaluation of bond strength and critical slip of various types of FRP bars in concrete. Struct Concr. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202301008

[43] Okada J, Yoda T, Lebet J-P. A study of the grouped arrangements of stud connectors on shear strength behavior. Struct Eng/Earthquake Eng, 2006, 23(1): 75s-89s

[44] Ollgaard JG, Slutter RG, Fisher JW. Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal-weight concrete. Eng J, 1971, 8(2): 55-64

[45] Qi J, Hu Y, Wang J, Li W. Behavior and strength of headed stud shear connectors in ultra-high performance concrete of composite bridges. Front Struct Civ Eng, 2019, 13(5): 1138-1149

[46] Reich Y. Machine learning techniques for civil engineering problems. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng, 1997, 12(4): 295-310

[47] Setvati MR, Hicks SJ. Machine learning models for predicting resistance of headed studs embedded in concrete. Eng Struct, 2022, 254 113803

[48] Shim CS, Lee PG, Yoon TY. Static behavior of large stud shear connectors. Eng Struct, 2004, 26(12): 1853-1860

[49] Shintaro Kuwahara AN, Nguyen MH, Fujikura S. Comparative investigation between response of shear connector of steel plate girder under live load and its fatigue strength. J Struct Eng JSCE, 2017, 67A: 899-909

[50] Spremic M, Markovic Z, Veljkovic M, Budjevac D. Push-out experiments of headed shear studs in group arrangements. Adv Steel Constr, 2013, 9(2): 139-160

[51] Su QT, Yang G, Bradford MA. Static behaviour of multi-row stud shear connectors in high-strength concrete. Steel Compos Struct, 2014, 17(6): 967-980

[52] Sun Y, et al.. Research on seismic performance optimization of cable-stayed bridge dampers based on machine learning. Adv Bridge Eng, 2026, 7(1 4

[53] HT Thai (2022) Machine learning for structural engineering: a state-of-the-art review. Structures 38:448–491. Elsevier

[54] Tong L, Chen L, Wen M, Xu C. Static behavior of stud shear connectors in high-strength-steel–UHPC composite beams. Eng Struct, 2020, 218 110827

[55] T Van Rin, NM Hai, PH Nam (2023) Analytical study on flexural behavior of steel composite girder using truss element for shear connectors with different types and layouts. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 1289(1):012007. IOP Publishing

[56] N Vu-Bac, T Le-Anh, T Rabczuk (2025) A Machine Learning based uncertainty quantification for compressive strength of high-performance concrete. Front Struct Civil Eng 19:1–13

[57] Wang JY, Guo JY, Jia LJ, Chen SM, Dong Y. Push-out tests of demountable headed stud shear connectors in steel-UHPC composite structures. Compos Struct, 2017, 170: 69-79

[58] Wang J, Xu Q, Yao Y, Qi J, Xiu H. Static behavior of grouped large headed stud-UHPC shear connectors in composite structures. Compos Struct, 2018, 206: 202-214

[59] Wang YH, Yu J, Liu JP, Chen YF. Shear behavior of shear stud groups in precast concrete decks. Eng Struct, 2019, 187: 73-84

[60] Wang S, Tang C, Fu Y, Zhu J, Di J, Li G (2024) Methodology for calculating load capacity reduction and slip relationship of clustered group nail connectors. Adv Bridge Eng 5(1):7

[61] Wang Z, Chen X, Zhang J, Huang H (2025a) Machine learning-based prediction and interpretability analysis of flexural capacity for CFRP-strengthened RC beams. Case Stud Constr Mater 23:e05203

[62] Wang M, Du M, Zhuang X, Lv H, Wang C, Zhou S. Multi-objective optimization of ultra-high performance concrete based on life-cycle assessment and machine learning methods. Front Struct Civ Eng, 2025, 19(1): 143-161

[63] Wenhao Chai JD, Lu Y, Qin F, Men P, Su Yi. Experimental investigation on static mechanical performance of grouped-stud shear connectors in steel–UHPC composite beams. Eng Struct, 2024, 306 117836

[64] Xu C, Sugiura K, Wu C, Su Q. Parametrical static analysis on group studs with typical push-out tests. J Constr Steel Res, 2012, 72: 84-96

[65] Xu C, Sugiura K, Masuya H, Hashimoto K, Fukada S. Experimental study on the biaxial loading effect on group stud shear connectors of steel-concrete composite bridges. J Bridge Eng, 2015, 20(10 04014110

[66] Xu C, Su Q, Sugiura K. Mechanism study on the low cycle fatigue behavior of group studs shear connectors in steel-concrete composite bridges. J Constr Steel Res, 2017, 138: 196-207

[67] Xue W, Ding M, Wang H, Luo Z. Static behavior and theoretical model of stud shear connectors. J Bridge Eng, 2008, 13(6): 623-634

[68] Xue D, Liu Y, Yu Z, He J. Static behavior of multi-stud shear connectors for steel-concrete composite bridge. J Constr Steel Res, 2012, 74: 1-7

[69] Yu-liang H, Shi-jie G, Li-chao W, Ying Y, Yi-qiang X. Experimental and numerical analysis of grouped stud shear connectors embedded in HFRC. Constr Build Mater, 2020, 242 118197

[70] Zhou C, Wang W, Zheng Y. Data-driven shear capacity analysis of headed stud in steel-UHPC composite structures. Eng Struct, 2024, 321 118946

[71] J Zhu, AIB Farouk (2023) Development of hybrid models for shear resistance prediction of grouped stud connectors in concrete using improved metaheuristic optimization techniques. Structures 50:286–302. Elsevier

[72] S Zou, R Chen, H Wang, Z Fang, C Qu, C Zhang (2025) Effect of shear key geometrical dimensions on seismic performance of prefabricated concrete piers with shallow socket connections. Structures 71:107975. Elsevier

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)