A differential strain-based approach for identifying prestress and moving forces in prestressed concrete bridges

Abstract

Restressing force in prestressed concrete bridges (PCBs) is reduced due to ageing, and operational and environmental loading, and it can significantly impact on their load-carrying capacity. Existing dynamic methods are insensitive to the prestress force, and the identification accuracy is significantly affected by operational environments. This paper is to develop a novel differential strain-based time-domain inverse method for prestress force identification of PCBs under moving vehicles. Both prestress and moving forces are identified simultaneously from dual strain measurements on the bridge. A Vandermonde matrix-based convolution formula is constructed to ensure the accuracy of the least squares solution for ill-posed inverse problems. The proposed method is validated using numerical studies on a two-span continuously supported prestressed concrete T-beam and verified experimentally on a simply supported box girder bridge model. Field monitoring data, together with a calibrated finite element model of a three-span continuously supported PCB, is used to further verify the performance of the proposed method. To ensure accurate formulation of the prestressed bridge–vehicle system matrix for effective force identification, modal updating with Rayleigh damping is employed in the calibration process. The results demonstrate that the proposed method can simultaneously and accurately identify both prestress and moving forces, enabling reliable real-time structural condition assessment of the bridge.

Keywords

Prestressed concrete bridge / Structural health monitoring / Prestress force / Moving force / Differential strain

References

[1] Acharya D, Rani A, Agarwal S, Singh V. Application of adaptive Savitzky-Golay filter for EEG signal processing. Perspect Sci (Neth), 2016, 8: 677-679

[2] Agostinacchio M, Ciampa D, Olita S. The vibrations induced by surface irregularities in road pavements – a Matlab® approach. Eur Transp Res Rev, 2014, 6: 267-275

[3] Bagge N, Nilimaa J, Elfgren L. In-situ methods to determine residual prestress forces in concrete bridges. Eng Struct, 2017, 135: 41-52

[4] Biswal S, Ramaswamy A. Measurement of existing prestressing force in concrete structures through an embedded vibrating beam strain gauge. Measurement, 2016, 83: 10-19

[5] Bonopera M, Chang K-C, Lee Z-K. State-of-the-Art review on determining prestress losses in prestressed concrete girders. Appl Sci, 2020, 10 7257

[6] Breccolotti M. Eigenfrequencies of continuous prestressed concrete bridges subjected to prestress losses. Structures, 2020, 25: 138-146

[7] Cao D, Qin X-C, Meng S-P, Tu Y-M, Elfgren L, Sabourova N, Grip N, Ohlsson U, Blanksvärd T. Evaluation of prestress losses in prestressed concrete specimens subjected to freeze–thaw cycles. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2016, 12: 159-170

[8] Chan THT, Yung TH. A theoretical study of force identification using prestressed concrete bridges. Eng Struct, 2000, 22: 1529-1537

[9] Chan THT, Law SS, Yung TH. Moving force identification using an existing prestressed concrete bridge. Eng Struct, 2000, 22: 1261-1270

[10] Chan THT, Yu L, Law SS, Yung TH. Moving force identification studies, I: theory. J Sound Vib, 2001, 247: 59-76

[11] Chan THT, Yu L, Law SS, Yung TH. Moving force identification studies, II: comparative studies. J Sound Vib, 2001, 247: 77-95

[12] Chávez AA, Gonzalez-Libreros J, Wang C, Capacci L, Biondini F, Elfgren L, Sas G. Assessment of residual prestress in existing concrete bridges: the Kalix bridge. Eng Struct, 2024, 311 118194

[13] Chen Z, Chan THT, Nguyen A. Moving force identification based on modified preconditioned conjugate gradient method. J Sound Vib, 2018, 423: 100-117

[14] Chen Z, Chan THT, Yu L. Comparison of regularization methods for moving force identification with ill-posed problems. J Sound Vib, 2020, 478 115349

[15] Chen Z, Sun P, Chan THT, Yu L. Ill-posedness determination of moving force identification and parameters selection for regularization methods. Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 2021, 21 2150114

[16] Chen Z, Deng L, Kong X. Modified truncated singular value decomposition method for moving force identification. Adv Struct Eng, 2022, 25: 2609-2623

[17] Ho D-D, Kim J-T, Stubbs N, Park W-S. Prestress-force estimation in PSC girder using modal parameters and system identification. Adv Struct Eng, 2012, 15: 997-1012

[18] Hussin M, Chan THT, Fawzia S, Ghasemi N. Identifying the prestress force in prestressed concrete bridges using ultrasonic technology. Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 2020, 20 2042014

[19] Jeyamohan K, Chan THT, Nguyen K-D, Thambiratnam DP. Prestress force and moving force identification in prestressed concrete bridges via Lagrangian polynomial-based load shape function approach. J Civ Struct Health Monit, 2024

[20] Jeyamohan K, Chan THT, Nguyen K-D, Thambiratnam DP, Zhu X. Internal force identification in prestressed concrete bridges via Lagrangian interpolation and substructural modelling technique. Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 2025

[21] Jia S, Akiyama M, Han B, Frangopol DM (2023) Probabilistic structural identification and condition assessment of prestressed concrete bridges based on Bayesian inference using deflection measurements. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2192508

[22] Khandel O, Soliman M, Floyd RW, Murray CD. Performance assessment of prestressed concrete bridge girders using fiber optic sensors and artificial neural networks. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2021, 17: 605-619

[23] Kim J-M, Kim H-W, Park Y-H, Yang I-H, Kim Y-S. FBG sensors encapsulated into 7-Wire steel strand for tension monitoring of a prestressing tendon. Adv Struct Eng, 2012, 15: 907-917

[24] Kralovanec J, Bahleda F, Moravcik M. State of prestressing analysis of 62-year-old bridge. Materials, 2022, 15: 3583

[25] Lai X, Furkan M, Bartoli I, Aktan AE, Grimmelsman K. Bridge weigh-in-motion using augmented Kalman filter and model updating. J Civ Struct Health Monit, 2022, 12: 593-610

[26] Law SS, Lu ZR. Time domain responses of a prestressed beam and prestress identification. J Sound Vib, 2005, 288: 1011-1025

[27] Law SS, Chan THT, Zeng QH. Moving Force Identification: a time domain method. J Sound Vib, 1997, 201: 1-22

[28] Law SS, Chan THT, Zeng QH. Moving Force Identification—a frequency and time domains analysis. J Dyn Syst Meas Control, 1999, 121: 394-401

[29] Lu ZR, Law SS. Identification of prestress force from measured structural responses. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2006, 20: 2186-2199

[30] Luo J, Ying K, He P, Bai J. Properties of Savitzky-Golay digital differentiators. Digit Signal Process, 2005, 15: 122-136

[31] Ma L, Zhang W, Han WS, Liu JX. Determining the dynamic amplification factor of multi-span continuous box girder bridges in highways using vehicle-bridge interaction analyses. Eng Struct, 2019, 181: 47-59

[32] Ma Z, Choi J, Sohn H. Structural displacement sensing techniques for civil infrastructure: a review. J Infrastruct Intell Resil, 2023, 2 100041

[33] Páez PM. A simplified approach to determine the prestress loss and time-dependent deflection in cracked prestressed concrete members, prestressed with fiber reinforced polymers or steel tendons. Eng Struct, 2023, 279 115523

[34] Pathirage TS (2017) Identification of prestress force in prestressed concrete box girder bridges using vibration based techniques. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.112767

[35] Rahman MdH, Gupta C. Computation of Rayleigh damping coefficient of a rectangular submerged floating tunnel (SFT). SN Appl Sci, 2020, 2 936

[36] Rashetnia R, Ghasemzadeh F, Hallaji M, Pour-Ghaz M. Quantifying prestressing force loss due to corrosion from dynamic structural response. J Sound Vib, 2018, 433: 129-137

[37] Saiidi M, Douglas B, Feng S. Prestress force effect on vibration frequency of concrete bridges. J Struct Eng, 1994, 120: 2233-2241

[38] Savitzky A, Golay MJE. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem, 1964, 36: 1627-1639

[39] Staggs JEJ. Savitzky-Golay smoothing and numerical differentiation of cone calorimeter mass data. Fire Saf J, 2005, 40: 493-505

[40] Talaei S, Zhu X, Li J, Yu Y, Chan THT. A hybrid domain adaptation approach for estimation of prestressed forces in prestressed concrete bridges under moving vehicles. Eng Struct, 2025, 330 119904

[41] Tse FS, Morse IE, Hinkle RT. Mechanical vibrations, theory and applications, 1978, Boston, Allyn and Bacon, Inc

[42] Van Breugel FV, Kutz JN, Brunton BW. Numerical differentiation of noisy data: a unifying multi-objective optimization framework. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 196865-196877

[43] Van Van L, Thanh Tung N. Influence of road quality and suspension stiffness on passenger vehicles oscillation in Viet Nam. Mater Today Proc, 2023

[44] Wang L, Hou JL, Ou JP. Moving force identification based on load shape function for a long-span bridge structure. Chin J Comput Mech, 2012, 29: 153-158

[45] Wang W, Xiang Z, Wang Y, Shao X, Lu J. Prestress force and general excitation identification for plate-like concrete bridges. Buildings, 2024, 14 2032

[46] Wu SQ, Law SS. Moving force identification based on stochastic finite element model. Eng Struct, 2010, 32: 1016-1027

[47] Xiang Z, Chan THT, Thambiratnam DP, Nguyen T. Synergic identification of prestress force and moving load on prestressed concrete beam based on virtual distortion method. Smart Struct Syst, 2016, 17: 917-933

[48] Xiang Z, Chan THT, Thambiratnam DP, Nguyen T. Prestress and excitation force identification in a prestressed concrete box-girder bridge. Computers Concrete, 2017, 20: 617-625

[49] Yan M, Yang Y, Li X, Bao Y, Sun J, Sun B. Pretensioned prestress friction losses considering contact imperfection at deviators in prestressed concrete girders. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2021, 17: 1639-1650

[50] Yang IH. Uncertainty and updating of long-term prediction of prestress forces in PSC box girder bridges. Comput Struct, 2005, 83: 2137-2149

[51] Yang M, Gong J, Yang X. Refined calculation of time-dependent prestress losses in prestressed concrete girders. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2020, 16: 1430-1446

[52] Yau J-D, Yang Y-B, Kuo S-R. Impact response of high-speed rail bridges and riding comfort of rail cars. Eng Struct, 1999, 21: 836-844

[53] Zhang H, Guo Q-Q, Xu L-Y. Prediction of long-term prestress loss for prestressed concrete cylinder structures using machine learning. Eng Struct, 2023, 279 115577

[54] Zhou H, Fan X, Liu Y. Dynamic serviceability and safety reliability analysis of aging PC girder bridges with non-prestressed reinforcement considering concrete shrinkage, creep and stochastic vehicle load flows. Structures, 2024, 64 106515

[55] Zhu J, Meng Q, Shi T, Yang X. Long-term deformation analysis of prestressed concrete bridges under ambient thermal and vehicle loads. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2023, 19: 1656-1675

Funding

Australian Research Council(DP220102045)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)