Full field LiDAR-based measurement of deflection and support condition effects in a scaled bridge model: comparison with traditional point sensors

Abstract

Bridge inspections are critical for ensuring structural safety, and Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) provides continuous information on bridge performance. Traditional SHM methods rely on contact sensors or visual inspection, which may not capture the full extent of structural behavior. This study evaluates Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) as a noncontact technique for measuring bridge deflection and settlement. Unlike single-point instruments, LiDAR provides full-field measurements of the structure, enabling spatially continuous measurements of girder and support behavior. A scaled bridge model was constructed using aluminum I-beams and plywood decking, supported by concrete masonry blocks to simulate abutments. Support conditions were varied from all pins to all springs across eleven tests. LiDAR measurements were compared against control baselines obtained from string potentiometers, a laser reference method, and reaction scales. Results showed that LiDAR captured deflections with an overall average difference of 1.82 mm across the scaled bridge model and measured settlement with an average agreement of over 87%, corresponding to a maximum difference of 5.00 mm. Importantly, LiDAR captured changes in deformation patterns across support-condition cases that were not consistently reflected by single-point measurements, highlighting the value of spatially distributed displacement data. These findings support LiDAR as a reliable approach for quantifying deflection and settlement under varying boundary conditions and motivate further validation under field and dynamic loading conditions.

References

[1] Al Shaini I, Blanco ACT (2023) Bridge deck surface damage assessment using point cloud data. Adv Bridge Eng 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-023-00110-4

[2] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2025) 2025 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure . Reston

[3] ASTM International (2024) Standard Specification for Highway Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Systems with User Requirements and Test Methods

[4] Bridge Diagnostics I (2023) BDI raw data. Refined results. https://bditest.com/product-tag/string-pot/. Accessed 24 Oct 2025

[5] Calvi PM, Che E, Sweet T, et al.. Data collection using terrestrial laser scanners from the shake-table test of a full-scale reinforced concrete building. J Struct Eng, 2024

[6] Catbas FN, Susoy M, Frangopol DM. Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data. Eng Struct, 2008, 30: 2347-2359

[7] Cha G, Sim S-H, Park S, Oh T. LiDAR-based bridge displacement estimation using 3D spatial optimization. Sensors, 2020, 20 Article ID: 7117

[8] Chacón R, Casas JR, Ramonell C, et al.. Requirements and challenges for infusion of SHM systems within Digital Twin platforms. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2025, 21: 599-615

[9] Chen S-Z, Chen J-Q, Zhao M-X, et al.. Performance of bridge weigh-in-motion methods considering environmental temperature field effect. Structures, 2025, 76 Article ID: 108981

[10] Falcetelli F, Yue N, Di Sante R, Zarouchas D. Probability of detection, localization, and sizing: the evolution of reliability metrics in Structural Health Monitoring. Struct Health Monit, 2022, 21: 2990-3017

[11] FARO (2022) Focus Premium Laser Scanner User Manual. https://www.faro.com/en/Products/Hardware/Focus-Laser-Scanners. Accessed 24 Oct 2025

[12] Fick D, Bell M, Wong J (2024) Significant Factors of Bridge Deterioration Task 2 Report: Data and Maintenance Record Review

[13] Giulio M, Daniele C, Antonio B, Domenico A (2024) Real-Time evaluation of bridge girder deflection under heavy vehicles. In: Procedia Structural Integrity. Elsevier B.V., pp 2101–2108. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.09.30

[14] Hekič D, Anžlin A, Kreslin M, et al.. Model updating concept using bridge weigh-in-motion data. Sensors, 2023, 23 Article ID: 2067

[15] Jirawattanasomkul T, Hang L, Srivaranun S, et al.. Digital twin-based structural health monitoring and measurements of dynamic characteristics in balanced cantilever bridge. Resilient Cities Struct, 2025, 4: 48-66

[16] Kaartinen E, Dunphy K, Sadhu A. LiDAR-based structural health monitoring: applications in civil infrastructure systems. Sensors, 2022

[17] Kong A, Wang Y, Zhao J (2026) Lightweight and accurate infrared rangefinder-fused LiDAR-inertial localization for UAV-based bridge inspection in GPS-denied environments. Measurement (Lond) 257:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.118983

[18] Krupas M, Kajati E, Liu C, Zolotova I. Towards a human-centric digital twin for human–machine collaboration: a review on enabling technologies and methods. Sensors, 2024

[19] Lee J, Lee K, Lee S, et al (2019) Long‐term displacement measurement of bridges using a LiDAR system. Struct Control Health Monit 26. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2428

[20] Lin C, Abe S, Zheng S, et al.. A structure-oriented loss function for automated semantic segmentation of bridge point clouds. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng, 2025, 40: 801-816

[21] Lowe’s Bosch red 100-ft self-leveling indoor/outdoor cross-line laser level with cross beam (2025) https://www.lowes.com/pd/Bosch-Red-100-ft-Self-Leveling-Indoor-Outdoor-Cross-line-Laser-Level-with-Cross-Beam/5014712263?cm_mmc=shp-_-c-_-prd-_-hdw-_-bng-_-PMAX_HDW_000_Priority_Item-_-5014712263-_-Local-_-0-_-0&gclid=81fa0fc8f93f1530350067340cecbf63&gclsrc=3p.ds&msclkid=81fa0fc8f93f1530350067340cecbf63&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=PMAX_HDW_000_Priority_Item&utm_term=2333713430351287&utm_content=PMAX_HDW_Construction-Hand-Tools_Sets*. Accessed 24 Oct 2025

[22] Lüleci F, Algadi A, Luleci F, et al (2024) Operational Modal Analysis of a Pedestrian Bridge Using Ultra-Sensitive Wireless Accelerometers Under Different Structural Scenarios

[23] Maboudi M, Backhaus J, Mai I, et al.. Very high resolution bridge deformation monitoring using UAV-based photogrammetry. J Civ Struct Health Monit, 2025

[24] Maru MB, Lee D, Tola KD, Park S. Comparison of depth camera and terrestrial laser scanner in monitoring structural deflections. Sensors, 2020, 21 Article ID: 201

[25] Meng X, Dodson AH, Roberts GW. Detecting bridge dynamics with GPS and triaxial accelerometers. Eng Struct, 2007, 29: 3178-3184

[26] Minnesota Department of Transportation (2013) Appendix G. General Practice for Installing and Use of Settlement Plates Background (Geotechnical Engineering Manual)

[27] Moghadam A, AlHamaydeh M, Sarlo R. Dual-purpose procedure for bridge health monitoring and weigh-in-motion used for multiple-vehicle events. Autom Constr, 2023, 148 Article ID: 104768

[28] Paul D, Roy K. Application of bridge weigh-in-motion system in bridge health monitoring: a state-of-the-art review. Struct Health Monit, 2023, 22: 4194-4232

[29] Qu X, Ding X, Xu YL (2025) Simultaneous monitoring of displacement and rotation of a long-span bridge based on innovative integration of GNSS and accelerometer measurements. Eng Struct 338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120518

[30] Ribeiro D, Rakoczy AM, Cabral R, et al.. Methodologies for remote bridge inspection—review. Sensors, 2025, 25 Article ID: 5708

[31] Ryan T, Lloyd C, Pichura M, et al (2022) Bridge Inspector’s Reference Manual (BIRM)

[32] Sharma A, Kasilingam S (2025) Structural Health Monitoring of Steel Girder Bridge Using Photogrammetry and LiDAR Scan Technology: Proof of Concept

[33] Sousa H, Cavadas F, Henriques A, et al.. Bridge deflection evaluation using strain and rotation measurements. Smart Struct Syst, 2013, 11: 365-386

[34] Tan D, Li W, Tao Y, Ji B. Bridge deformation monitoring combining 3D laser scanning with multi-scale algorithms. Sensors, 2025, 25: 3869

[35] Trias Blanco AC, Gong J, Moon FL. Use of Point Clouds to Enhance Bridge Deck Quality Control. Airfield and Highway Pavements 2025, 2025Reston, VAAmerican Society of Civil Engineers769-778

[36] Trias-Blanco A, Gong J, Moon F. Characterization of operational vibrations of steel-girder highway bridges via LiDAR. Remote Sens (Basel), 2023, 15: 1003

[37] Truong-Hong L, Laefer DF (2014) Using terrestrial laser scanning for dynamic bridge deflection measurement. In IABSE Istanbul Bridge Conference. IABSE Istanbul Bridge Conference

[38] Truong-Hong L, Lindenbergh R (2022) Automatically extracting surfaces of reinforced concrete bridges from terrestrial laser scanning point clouds. Autom Constr 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104127

[39] Uline Rubbermaid Digital Utility Scale -- 400 lbs .5 lb (H-479) (2025) https://www.uline.com/Product/Detail/H-479/Shipping-and-Weighing-Scales/Rubbermaid-Digital-Utility-Scale-400-lbs-x-5-lb?pricode=WA9761&gadtype=pla&id=H-479&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=11612151726&gbraid=0AAAAAD_uetNkDfCbkgb_VY9L5eETMECrD&gclid=CjwKCAjw6vHHBhBwEiwAq4zvAxPxYvPRgvSzZYRSzhmK6tLUhruNP-cQjKLknXzIc5S5L1_FRRKXoRoCyscQAvD_BwE. Accessed 24 Oct 2025

[40] Vijayalakshmi Palanisamy V, Venkatachalam S. LiDAR-based temporal surface damage assessment of bridge infrastructure using efficient scan area planning. Autom Constr, 2025, 180 Article ID: 106526

[41] Vrabel Jr J, Trias-Blanco A (2025) Innovative approaches to structural health monitoring: LiDAR for deflection and load path assessment. In: UNDER REIVEW Mahmoud K (ed) Proceedings of the 12th New York City Bridge Conference. Bridge Engineering Association, New York City

[42] Vrabel JJr, Trias-Blanco A. Bridge Support Assessment Through Deflection Analysis via LiDAR. Beyond Structural Engineering in a Changing World, 2024San JoseInternational Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)1290-1297

[43] Wang Y, Liang S, Huang C, Wang R. Foundation settlement response of existing high-speed railway bridge induced by construction of undercrossing roads. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2022

[44] Wittich CE, Wood RL, Alkady KH (2024) Lidar-Based Vibration Monitoring for Assessing Safety of Damaged Bridges

[45] Yan J, Zhang H, Ai Q, et al.. Digital twin-based bridge geometric quality inspection using knowledge mapping and data-driven method. Autom Constr, 2025

[46] Zhang B, Ren Y, He S, et al.. A review of methods and applications in structural health monitoring (SHM) for bridges. Measurement, 2025

[47] Zhou Y, Zhu J, Zhao L, et al.. High-precision monitoring method for bridge deformation measurement and error analysis based on terrestrial laser scanning. Remote Sens (Basel), 2024, 16: 2263

[48] Zhu L, Fu Y, Chow R, et al (2018) Development of a high-sensitivitywireless accelerometer for structural health monitoring. Sensors (Switzerland) 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010262

[49] Zhu Y, Brigham JC, Fascetti A (2025) LiDAR-RGB Data Fusion for Four-Dimensional UAV-Based Monitoring of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Construction: Case Study of the Fern Hollow Bridge Reconstruction. J Constr Eng Manag 151. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15411

[50] Zupanc GK (2016) Sharp eyes: how well can we really see? – scienceinschool.org. https://scienceinschool.org/article/2016/sharp-eyes-how-well-can-we-really-see/. Accessed 23 Oct 2025

Funding

Office of Postsecondary Education(P200A210109)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)