Transverse mechanical performance of precast segmental box beam with corrugated steel webs

Pin Zhao , Xueliang Rong , Xudong Shao , Yahui WEI , Yifan Huang

Advances in Bridge Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 13

PDF
Advances in Bridge Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) :13 DOI: 10.1186/s43251-025-00202-3
Original Innovation
research-article
Transverse mechanical performance of precast segmental box beam with corrugated steel webs
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

As composite box-beam bridges with corrugated steel webs (CSWs) evolve toward larger spans, multi-chamber configurations, and wider cantilevers, understanding deck transverse force transfer becomes critical. This study compares the transverse mechanical behavior of continuous precast and cast-in-place (CIP) CSW box beams through static testing of two variable cross-section specimens. Results reveal that construction methods minimally affect stiffness, strain distribution, and deformation during the elastic phase. Post-cracking behavior diverges significantly, with distinct differences in crack patterns, failure modes, and deformation characteristics. Integral beams developed dense, fine cracks at mid-support and mid-span regions, while precast specimens showed localized cracking near loading segments and middle support joints. The precast beam exhibited 25% faster crack width growth and 35% greater deflection rates post-cracking compared to the CIP specimen. Failure modes differed fundamentally: CIP beams failed through shear cracking in concrete slabs at mid-span, whereas precast beams failed via joint opening at critical connections. Transverse strain distribution patterns remained similar across both specimens, though precast sections demonstrated 12-15% faster transverse strain development. Beyond 1180kN loading, transverse strain differences exceeded 10%, with precast beams sustaining higher tensile (14.3%) and compressive (11.8%) strains than CIP counterparts at equivalent loads.These findings highlight that while both systems show comparable elastic performance, precast construction significantly influences post-cracking behavior through altered damage progression paths and accelerated strain development. The study provides critical insights for optimizing joint design and crack control in prefabricated CSW bridges, particularly regarding load redistribution mechanisms at serviceability and ultimate limit states. Practical implications include recommendations for modified reinforcement detailing at precast joints and enhanced monitoring of transverse strain concentrations in segmental assemblies.

Keywords

Bridge engineering / Continuous beam with corrugated steel webs / Precast segment assembling / Transverse internal force / Variable cross-section

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Pin Zhao, Xueliang Rong, Xudong Shao, Yahui WEI, Yifan Huang. Transverse mechanical performance of precast segmental box beam with corrugated steel webs. Advances in Bridge Engineering, 2026, 7(1): 13 DOI:10.1186/s43251-025-00202-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Deng W, Zhang J, Zhou M, et al. . Flexural Behavior of Segmental Prestressed Composite Beams with Corrugated Steel Webs. Mag Concr Res, 2020, 72(11): 578-594

[2]

He J, Liu YQ, Wang SH, et al. . Experimental study on structural performance of prefabricated composite box girder with corrugated webs and steel tube slab. J Bridge Eng, 2019, 24(6): 04019047

[3]

Ji W, Luo K, Ma WL. Natural vibration frequency analysis for a PC continuous box girder bridge with corrugated steel web based on the dynamic stiffness matrix. J Highway Transp Res Dev. (English Ed.), 2020, 14(1): 65-74

[4]

Jia BY, Yang YW, Xie BL, et al. . Novel geometric control technology for precast segmental bridges. J Constr Eng Manage, 2021, 147(4): 04021006

[5]

Jiang RJ, Wu QM, Xiao YF, et al. . The shear lag effect of composite box girder bridges with corrugated steel webs. Struct, 2023, 48: 1746-1760

[6]

Kristek V. Theory of box girders, 1979, New York. Wiley

[7]

Li HH, Li LF, Du CJ, et al. . Experimental study on the flexural behavior of a novel nonprismatic prestressed UHPC composite box girder with corrugated steel webs. J Bridge Eng, 2023, 28(7): 04023045

[8]

Liu C, Xu D, Li L, et al. . Behavior of concrete segmental box girder bridges with open webs. J Bridge Eng, 2015, 20(8): B4015003

[9]

Ma L, Zhou LY, Wan S. Study of the calculation method of lateral load distribution on a continuous composite box girder bridge with corrugated steel webs. J Highway Transp Res Dev (English Ed.), 2014, 8(2): 42-46

[10]

Nie JG, Zhu YJ, Tao MX, et al. . Optimized prestressed continuous composite girder bridges with corrugated steel webs. J Bridge Eng, 2016, 22(2): 04016121

[11]

Pandit UK, Mondal G, Punera D. Lateral torsional buckling analysis of corrugated steel web girders using homogenization approach. J Constr Steel Res, 2023, 210: 108099

[12]

Rambo-Roddenberry M, Kuhn D, Tindale RG. Barrier effect on transverse load distribution for prestressed concrete segmental box girder bridges. J Bridge Eng, 2016, 21(6): 04016019

[13]

Recupero A, Granata MF, Culotta G, et al. . Interaction between longitudinal shear and transverse bending in prestressed concrete box girders. J Bridge Eng, 2016, 22(1): 04016107

[14]

Saibabu S, Srinivas V, Sasmal S, et al. . Performance evaluation of dry and epoxy jointed segmental prestressed box girders under monotonic and cyclic loading. Constr Build Mater, 2013, 38: 931-940

[15]

Schupack M. Segmental precast concrete post-tensioned overpass bridges with cantilevered abutment. U.S. Patent. No. 3,794,433. 26 Feb. 1974.

[16]

Shamass R, Zhou XM, Wu ZY. Numerical analysis of shear-off failure of keyed epoxied joints in precast concrete segmental bridges. J Bridge Eng, 2016, 22(1): 04016108

[17]

Sung CY, Hung HH, Lin KC, et al. . Experimental testing and numerical simulation of precast segmental bridge piers constructed with a modular methodology. J Bridge Eng, 2017, 22(11): 04017087

[18]

Walter PJ, Muller JM (1982) Construction and design of prestressed concrete segmental bridges. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York

[19]

Wang D, Wang L, Liu Y, et al. . Failure mechanism investigation of bottom plate in concrete box girder bridges. Eng Fail Anal, 2020, 116: 104711

[20]

Xiang D, Liu YQ, Yang F. Numerical and theoretical analysis of slab transverse-moment distributions in twin-girder crossbeam composite bridges. J Bridge Eng, 2020, 25(3): 04020004

[21]

Zhang B, Chen WZ, Xu J. Mechanical behavior of prefabricated composite box girders with corrugated steel webs under static loads. J Bridge Eng, 2018, 23(10): 04018077

[22]

Zhang Z, Zou P, Deng EF, et al. . Experimental study on prefabricated composite box girder bridge with corrugated steel webs. J Constr Steel Res, 2023, 201: 107753

[23]

Zhao P, Ye JS. Frame analysis method of transverse internal force in bridge deck of box girders with corrugated steel webs. J Southeast Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2012, 42(5): 940-944(In Chinese)

[24]

Zhao P, Rong XL, Shao XD, et al. . Research on bending mechanism of precast segmental composite box girder with corrugated steel webs. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2022, 44(12): 142-149(In Chinese)

[25]

Zhou WB, Jiang LZ, Liu ZJ, et al. . Closed-form solution to thin-walled box girders considering effects of shear deformation and shear lag. J Cent South Univ, 2012, 19(9): 2650-2656

[26]

Zhou M, Zhang JD, Yang DY, et al. . Transverse analysis of a prestressed concrete wide box girder with stiffened ribs. J Bridge Eng, 2017, 22(8): 04017046

[27]

Zhu YB, Wan S, Shen KJ, et al. . Theoretical study on the nonlinear performance of single-box multi-cell composite box-girder with corrugated steel webs under pure torsion. J Constr Steel Res, 2021, 178: 106487

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52478193)

Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province(E2023210122)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/