Investigating the influence of UHPC layer length on the flexural response of prestressed concrete I-beams
Ali Sabah Imran Shwalia , Nabeel Hasan Ali Al-Salim
Advances in Bridge Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 36
This study presents an experimental investigation into the flexural behavior of prestressed reinforced concrete (PRC) I-shape beams strengthened with cast-in-situ ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) layers reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars. Five composite beams were subjected to four-point bending to determine the optimal length of UHPC layers on the tension side for enhancing flexural capacity. The varying lengths of the UHPC layers allowed for a comprehensive analysis of their effects on ultimate load, energy absorption, ductility index, stiffness, bonding behavior, and failure modes. The external UHPC reinforcement layers significantly delayed crack initiation and substantially increased the load-carrying capacity by 58% to 159%. Furthermore, the incorporation of UHPC layers on the tensile side of the PRC beams resulted in a varied response in energy absorption, ranging from a 23.54% reduction to a substantial 750.87% gain with increasing reinforcement layer length. While this strengthening approach led to a change in the ductility index, ranging from a 15.89% decrease to a 285.64% increase, it consistently enhanced the initial stiffness by 54.18% to 88.85% as the UHPC layer length increased. The findings underscore the significant influence of UHPC layer length on the beam's overall response and failure characteristics. A perfect bond was observed between the UHPC layer and the PRC beam, with no separation at the interface. Crucially, this robust bond, combined with decreasing UHPC layer lengths, shifted the failure mode from a ductile flexural failure to a sudden failure attributed to concrete cover separation. This research uniquely contributes by providing the first comprehensive experimental data on the effect of varying in-situ cast UHPC layer lengths on the combined flexural performance and distinct failure mechanisms of PRC I-beams reinforced with GFRP. Findings offer critical insights into optimizing strengthening designs and understanding the complex interplay between layer length and failure mode transition for such advanced composite systems.
Prestressed beam / UHPC / Strengthening / GFRP / I-shaped beam
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Abbas HM, Kadhim MM, Jawdhari A (2025) GFRP-reinforced UHPC overlays for strengthening RC beams in flexure. In Structures (Vol. 73, p. 108476). Elsevier. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Standard ASTM (2007) C1437: standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. Annual book of ASTM standards. |
| [7] |
American Society for Testing and Materials. Committee C-9 on Concrete and Concrete Aggregates. (2011). Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM international. |
| [8] |
Astm C (2014) 230/C 230M-14, Standard Specification for Flow Table for Use in Tests of Hydraulic Cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 6. |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
ACI Committee. (2005). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-05). American Concrete Institute |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
Engindeniz M (2008) Repair and strengthening of pre-1970 reinforced concrete corner beam-column joints using CFRP composites. Georgia Institute of Technology |
| [15] |
Afefy HM, Sennah K, Cofini A (2016) Retrofitting actual-size precracked precast prestressed concrete double-Tee girders using externally bonded CFRP sheets. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(2), 04015020 |
| [16] |
Fayed S, Mansour W (2023) Structural performance of seasand recycled aggregate concrete filled Solid/Hollow aluminum tubular Columns: An experimental work. In Structures (Vol. 47, pp. 1323-1340). Elsevier |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Graybeal, B. (2014). Design and construction of field-cast UHPC connections (No. FHWA-HRT-14 084; HRDI-40/10-14 (750) E). United States. Federal Highway Administration |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Kodsy A, Morcous G (2023) Predicting strength of non-prestressed concrete I beams repaired/strengthened in flexure and shear using Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC). In Structures (Vol. 58, p. 105670). Elsevier |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Li B (2012) Initial stiffness of reinforced concrete columns and walls. In 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Vol. 1, pp. 94-103) |
| [27] |
Lin T, Burns N, (1981) Design of prestressed concrete structures. Accessed: May 04, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://trid.trb.org/View/386187 |
| [28] |
MacGregor JG, Wight JK, Teng S, Irawan P (1997) Reinforced concrete: Mechanics and design (Vol. 3). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Mohammed AD, Salih OA (2024) An experimental study on reinforced concrete beams with GFRP and ordinary steel bars'flexural strength properties |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Nassiraei H, Rezadoost P (2024) Numerical study and probabilistic analysis on the strength of X-joints of steel offshore structures with GFRP, AFRP, CFRPs and SFRP subjected to axial load. In Structures (Vol. 69, p. 107424). Elsevier |
| [40] |
Nawy E, Prestressed concrete. A fundamental approach. 1996. Accessed: May 05, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://trid.trb.org/View/466354 |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Standard B (2009) Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens, BS EN, 12390-3 |
| [48] |
Standard ASTM (2007) C1437: standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. Annual book of ASTM standards |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |