Time-dependent advanced analysis method for steel truss bridges under atmospheric corrosion

Mutlu Seçer , Ali Alper Saylan

Advances in Bridge Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 34

PDF
Advances in Bridge Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 34 DOI: 10.1186/s43251-025-00181-5
Original Innovation
research-article

Time-dependent advanced analysis method for steel truss bridges under atmospheric corrosion

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Atmospheric corrosion is one of the major factors leading to the deterioration of steel truss bridges. In order to overcome this problem, protective coatings are generally applied to steel members. Since coatings also can deteriorate over time, investigating the time-dependent structural performance becomes essential. In this paper, a method was developed for the time-dependent advanced analysis of steel truss bridges with and without coatings. To achieve this goal, material and geometric nonlinearity were accounted for evaluating the structural load capacity of the bridges, and consequently, the whole structural behavior was monitored. The effect of atmospheric corrosion was modelled using a relationship based on ISO 9224 for members without coating. Besides, two different coating degradation models were applied for the members with coating. For the evaluation of the proposed method, four steel truss bridges from the literature were accounted and time-dependent structural load capacities were calculated under atmospheric corrosion exposure for 100 years. In order to represent the effects of different environments, each steel truss bridge type was assumed to be built in different countries, and atmospheric corrosion data for each case was acquired from international corrosion databases. Numerical analysis results revealed the importance of detrimental atmospheric corrosion effects in terms of structural load capacity in steel truss bridges. In some cases, reductions in structural capacities were significant and even unexpected failures occurred in aggressive environments. Besides, when coatings were applied to steel truss bridges under atmospheric corrosion, a satisfactory delay in the decrease in load-carrying capacity was achieved throughout the structural lifetime.

Keywords

Steel truss bridge / Atmospheric corrosion / Time-dependent advanced analysis / Coating

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mutlu Seçer, Ali Alper Saylan. Time-dependent advanced analysis method for steel truss bridges under atmospheric corrosion. Advances in Bridge Engineering, 2025, 6(1): 34 DOI:10.1186/s43251-025-00181-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ANSI/AISC 360–16 (2016) Specification for structural steel buildings. American National Standards Institute, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago

[2]

Biezma MV, Schanack F. Collapse of steel bridges. J Perform Constr Facil, 2007, 21: 398-405.

[3]

Biondini F, Frangopol DM. Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structural systems under uncertainty: review. J Struct Eng, 2016, 142: F4016001.

[4]

Cascini L, Portioli F, Landolfo R. Probabilistic time variant assessment of thin-walled steel members under atmospheric corrosion attack. J Civ Eng Manag, 2014, 20: 404-414.

[5]

Chen WF, Kim SELRFD steel design using advanced analysis, 1997New YorkCRC Press

[6]

Chico B, de la Fuente D, Díaz I. et al.. Annual atmospheric corrosion of carbon steel worldwide. An integration of ISOCORRAG, ICP/UNECE and MICAT databases. Materials, 2017, 10: 601.

[7]

Davis AQAQ JR (2000) Corrosion: understanding the basics. ASM International, Ohio

[8]

de la Fuente D, Díaz I, Simancas J. et al.. Long-term atmospheric corrosion of mild steel. Corros Sci, 2011, 53: 604-617.

[9]

Di Lorenzo G, Landolfo R. Sensitivity study of dynamics variability for mild-carbon steel structures affected by corrosion. Open Constr Build Technol J, 2019, 13: 251-268.

[10]

Ferrari R, Cocchetti G, Rizzi E. Evolutive and kinematic limit analysis algorithms for large-scale 3D truss-frame structures: comparison application to historic iron bridge arch. Int J Comput Methods, 2020, 17: 1-18.

[11]

FHWA (2015) Steel bridge design handbook corrosion protection, FHWA-HIF-16-002, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

[12]

Frangopol DM, Dong Y, Sabatino S. Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: analysis, prediction, optimisation and decision-making. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2017, 13: 1239-1257.

[13]

Guo S, Si R, Dai Q. et al.. A critical review of corrosion development and rust removal techniques on the structural/environmental performance of corroded steel bridges. J Clean Prod, 2019, 233: 126-146.

[14]

Hasançebi O. Adaptive evolution strategies in structural optimization: enhancing their computational performance with applications to large-scale structures. Comput Struct, 2008, 86: 119-132.

[15]

Hasançebi O, Çarbaş S, Doğan E, Erdal F, Saka MP. Performance evaluation of metaheuristic search techniques in the optimum design of real size pin jointed structures. Comput Struct, 2009, 87: 284-302.

[16]

Helsel JL, Lanterman R, Wissmar K (2008) Expected service life and cost considerations for maintenance and new construction protective coating work. In Proceedings of the Corrosion 2008, Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). https://doi.org/10.5006/C2008-08279

[17]

ISO 9223 (2012) Corrosion of metals and alloys-Corrosivity of atmospheres-Classification, determination and estimation. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

[18]

ISO 9224 (2012) Corrosion of metals and alloys - Corrosivity of atmospheres - Guiding values for the corrosivity categories. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

[19]

Kallias AN, Imam B, Chryssanthopoulos MK. Performance profiles of metallic bridges subject to coating degradation and atmospheric corrosion. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2017, 13: 440-453.

[20]

Karakas AI, Artar M, Ozgan K, Daloglu AT (2016) Optimum Design of Space Truss Bridges Including Soil-Structure Interaction. In: International Conference on Engineering and Natural Science. pp 1022–1029

[21]

Kayser JR, Nowak AS. Capacity loss due to corrosion in steel-girder bridges. J Struct Eng, 1989, 115: 1525-1537.

[22]

Kere KJ, Huang Q. Life-cycle cost comparison of corrosion management strategies for steel bridges. J Bridge Eng, 2019, 24: 04019007.

[23]

Kim S-E, Ma S-S. Optimal design using genetic algorithm with nonlinear inelastic analysis. Steel Compos Struct, 2007, 7: 421-440.

[24]

Kim SE, Park MH, Choi SH. Practical advanced analysis and design of three-dimensional truss bridges. J Constr Steel Res, 2001, 57: 907-923.

[25]

Kim SE, Choi SH, Ma SS. Performance based design of steel arch bridges using practical inelastic nonlinear analysis. J Constr Steel Res, 2003, 59: 91-108.

[26]

Klinesmith DE, McCuen RH, Albrecht P. Effect of environmental conditions on corrosion rates. J Mater Civ Eng, 2007, 19: 121-129.

[27]

Knotkova D, Kreislova K, Sheldon WJ (2010) ISOCORRAG international atmospheric exposure program: Summary of results. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International. https://doi.org/10.1520/DS71-EB

[28]

Kobus J. Long-term atmospheric corrosion monitoring. Mater Corros, 2000, 51: 104-108.

[29]

Kreislova K, Geiplova H. Evaluation of corrosion protection of steel bridges. Procedia Eng, 2012, 40: 229-234.

[30]

Kreislova K, Knotkova D. The results of 45 years of atmospheric corrosion study in the Czech Republic. Materials, 2017, 10: 394.

[31]

Kullashi G, Siriwardane SC, Atteya MA. Lateral torsional buckling capacity of corroded steel beams: a parametric study. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 2021, 1201: 012038.

[32]

Landolfo R, Portioli F, Parrilli M, D’Aniello M. The seismic protection of Umberto I Gallery in Napales with FRPs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Protection of Historical Buildings, PROHITECH, 2009, 09: 623-628

[33]

Landolfo R, Cascini L, Portioli F. Modeling of metal structure corrosion damage: a state of the art report. Sustainability, 2010, 2: 2163-2175.

[34]

Landolfo R, Cascini L, Portioli F. Sustainability of steel structures: towards an integrated approach to life-time engineering design. Front Archit Civ Eng China, 2011, 5: 304-314.

[35]

Morcillo MKirk KK, Lawson HH. Atmospheric Corrosion in lbero-America: The Micat Project. Atmospheric Corrosion, ASTM STP 1239, 1995PhiladelphiaAmerican Society for Testing and Materials250-277

[36]

Paglia C, Antonietti S, Mosca C. The deterioration of 100 years old coated steel bridges. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 2021, 1150: 012009.

[37]

Paik JK, Kim SK, Lee SK. Probabilistic corrosion rate estimation model for longitudinal strength members of bulk carriers. Ocean Eng, 1998, 25: 837-860.

[38]

Rahgozar R. Remaining capacity assessment of corrosion damaged beams using minimum curves. J Constr Steel Res, 2009, 65: 299-307.

[39]

Rahgozar R, Sharifi Y, Malekinejad M. Buckling capacity of uniformly corroded steel members in terms of exposure time. Steel Compos Struct, 2010, 10: 475-487.

[40]

Sabatino S, Frangopol DM, Dong Y. Life cycle utility-informed maintenance planning based on lifetime functions: optimum balancing of cost, failure consequences and performance benefit. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2016, 12: 830-847.

[41]

Saylan AA, Seçer M. Structural frequency-based maintenance management method for steel truss bridges under atmospheric corrosion. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2024.

[42]

Seçer M. Inelastic and large deformation analyses of plane trusses. Technology, 2009, 12: 175-184

[43]

Seçer M, Saylan AA. Evaluation of corrosion management strategies for steel truss bridges based on ultimate load capacity and lifetime direct cost. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2025, 21: 675-694.

[44]

Secer M, Uzun ET. Corrosion damage analysis of steel frames considering lateral torsional buckling. Procedia Eng., 2017, 1(171): 1234-41.

[45]

Sharifi Y. Reliability of deteriorating steel. Adv Steel Constr, 2011, 7: 220-238

[46]

Taylor SR, Contu F, Calle LM. et al.. Predicting the long-term field performance of coating systems on steel using a rapid electrochemical test: the damage tolerance test. Corrosion, 2012, 68: 1-13.

[47]

Thai HT, Kim SE. Practical advanced analysis software for nonlinear inelastic analysis of space steel structures. Adv Eng Softw, 2009, 40: 786-797.

[48]

Truong VH, Kim SE. Reliability-based design optimization of nonlinear inelastic trusses using improved differential evolution algorithm. Adv Eng Softw, 2018, 121: 59-74.

[49]

Wardhana K, Hadipriono FC. Study of recent building failures in the United States. J Perform Constr Facil, 2003, 17: 151-158.

[50]

Zhang Z, Wu J, Su T. et al.. Life prediction for anticorrosive coatings on steel bridges. Corrosion, 2020, 76: 773-785.

[51]

Zhao Z, Mo S, Xiong Q. et al.. Moment capacity of H-section steel beam with randomly located pitting corrosion. Probabilistic Eng Mech, 2021, 66: 103161.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

176

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/