Transformation towards good governance in small-scale fisheries territory under ocean grabbing

Abstract

Small-scale fisheries face multiple conflicts that increasingly define a scenario of blue injustice. Our study occurred in a fishing territory under ocean grabbing driven by the Latin America’s largest port, located in São Paulo State, Brazil. To address this context, we adopted a transdisciplinary approach, organizing workshops with fishers to discuss the consequences of overlapping fishing and port territories and conducting interviews with institutional actors to understand their perceptions of the conflict and their roles in local governance. Building on these results, we convened stakeholders in a participatory scenario exercise to design strategies for transforming this reality. The process identified four priority spheres: Negotiation Body, Environmental Licensing, Social Participation, and Regulation of Port Activities, considered essential for change, and for which specific strategies were co-developed to form an action plan. However, this effort was weakened by limited engagement from institutional actors and by the persistent difficulty of establishing a formal governance body. The co-construction process involving multiple stakeholders converged on a shared understanding of the advancement of ocean grabbing. From the perspective of Interactive Governance, the meta-order still struggles to recognize small-scale fisheries and their knowledge. Even so, the research fostered interactions among governance orders and supported the co-construction of a document with fishers as a contribution to second-order environmental licensing processes. We also observed gains, including greater recognition of fishing communities and strengthened engagement among fishers. For meaningful transformation, a new narrative must be built to enhance the visibility and value of small-scale fishery, and scientific research can play a key role in this process.

Keywords

Artisanal fishery / Interactive Governance / Ocean grabbing / Port / Transdisciplinary research

References

[1] Azeez A, Muraleedharan KR, Revichandran C et al (2022) Modelling of sediment plume associated with the capital dredging for sustainable mangrove ecosystem in the Old Mangalore Port, Karnataka, India. Reg Stud Mar Sci 56:102693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2022.102693

[2] Amponsah SKK, Nunoo FKE, Lamptey AE, et al (2023) Impact of ports construction activities on structure, composition and diversity of fish population: case study of Tema, Ghana. Marine and Fishery Sciences (MAFIS) 37. https://doi.org/10.47193/mafis.3722024010502

[3] Anbleyth-Evans J (2023) Port developments and marine democracy in Latin America. Mar Policy 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105767

[4] Anbleyth-Evans J. Aggregate dredging impacts in South East England: Improving ecological health by integrating fisher ecological knowledge with scientific research. Mar Pollut Bull, 2018, 135: 129-138

[5] Anbleyth-Evans J, Lacy SN. Feedback between fisher local ecological knowledge and scientific epistemologies in England: building bridges for biodiversity conservation. Maritime Studies, 2019, 18: 189-203

[6] Anbleyth-Evans J, Lacy SN, Aguirre-Muñoz C, Tredinnick-Rowe J (2020a) Port dumping and participation in England: Developing an ecosystem approach through local ecological knowledge. Ocean Coast Manag 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105195

[7] Anbleyth-Evans J, Leiva FA, Rios FT, et al (2020b) Toward marine democracy in Chile: Examining aquaculture ecological impacts through common property local ecological knowledge. Mar Policy 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103690

[8] Anbleyth-Evans J, Prieto M, Barton J, et al.. Toxic violence in marine sacrificial zones: Developing blue justice through marine democracy in Chile. Environment and Planning c: Politics and Space, 2022, 40: 1492-1514

[9] Andrachuk M, Armitage D (2015) Understanding social-ecological change and transformation through community perceptions of system identity. Ecology and Society 20: art26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07759-200426

[10] Andrews N, Bennett NJ, Le Billon P, et al (2021) Oil, fisheries and coastal communities: A review of impacts on the environment, livelihoods, space and governance. Energy Res Soc Sci 75

[11] Aoki Inoue CY, Lemos Ribeiro T, Gonçalves VK, et al.. Indigenous and traditional communities’ ways of knowing and being in planetary justice. Env Polit, 2024, 33: 1225-1244

[12] Arias Schreiber M, Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S. Blue Justice and the co-production of hermeneutical resources for small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy, 2022, 137 ArticleID: 104959

[13] Ayilu RK (2023) Limits to blue economy: challenges to accessing fishing livelihoods in Ghana’s port communities. Maritime Studies 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-023-00302-8

[14] Barbesgaard M. Blue growth: savior or ocean grabbing?. J Peasant Stud, 2018, 45: 130-149

[15] Bausero-Jorcin S, Gelcich S, Gianelli I, et al (2024) Assessing the performance of a participatory governance transformation in small-scale fisheries: A case study from Uruguay. Mar Policy 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105964

[16] Bavinck M, Berkes F, Charles A, et al (2017) The impact of coastal grabbing on community conservation – a global reconnaissance. Maritime Studies 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0062-8

[17] Bennett NJ, Blythe J, White CS, Campero C (2021) Blue growth and blue justice: Ten risks and solutions for the ocean economy. Mar Policy 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104387

[18] Bennett NJ, Govan H, Satterfield T. Ocean grabbing. Mar. Policy, 2015, 57: 61-68

[19] Berkes F, Nayak PK. Role of communities in fisheries management: “one would first need to imagine it”. Maritime Studies, 2018, 17: 241-251

[20] Blythe JL, Armitage D, Bennett NJ, et al (2021) The Politics of Ocean Governance Transformations. Front Mar Sci 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.634718

[21] Blythe JL, Gill DA, Claudet J, et al (2023) Blue justice: A review of emerging scholarship and resistance movements. Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures 1

[22] Carr Kelman C, Srinivasan J, Lorenzo Bajaj T, et al (2024) Convergence research as transdisciplinary knowledge coproduction within cases of effective collaborative governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-15534-290423

[23] Chuenpagdee R, De C-M, Barragán-paladines MJ, et al.. Governing from images: Marine protected areas as case illustrations. J Nat Conserv, 2020, 53 ArticleID: 125756

[24] Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S. Transforming the governance of small-scale fisheries. Maritime Studies, 2018, 17: 101-115

[25] Cooke SJ, Nguyen VM, Chapman JM, et al.. Knowledge co-production: A pathway to effective fisheries management, conservation, and governance. Fisheries (Bethesda), 2021, 46: 89-97

[26] Damanik JDN, Wirazilmustaan W (2021) “Ocean Grabbing!”: Deprivation of Fishermen’s Rights or Management of Coastal and Marine Resources. Society 9:289–301. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v9i1.216

[27] da Silva HJH, Pierri N. Mariculture Policies and Ocean Grabbing in Brazil. Lat Am Perspect, 2024, 51: 151-168

[28] ECLAC (2025) Actividad Portuaria 2018. https://www.cepal.org/es/infografias/actividad-portuaria-2018-puertos-top-20-america-latina-caribe. Accessed 10 Feb 2025

[29] Ertör I. ‘We are the oceans, we are the people!’: fisher people’s struggles for blue justice. J Peasant Stud, 2021, 50: 1157-1186

[30] Falardeau M, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Bennett EM. A novel approach for co-producing positive scenarios that explore agency: case study from the Canadian Arctic. Sustain Sci, 2019, 14: 205-220

[31] FAO (2015) Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication. Roma

[32] Franz T, Gómez D, Idrobo CJ, Corzo O. Development and Well-being: Maritime Infrastructure and Ocean Grabbing on the Colombian Pacific Coast. Lat Am Perspect, 2024, 51: 232-248

[33] Fredrickson A. The California Coastal Act and Ports: The Unintended Environmental Justice Implications of Preserving California’s Coastline. Coast Manag, 2013, 41: 258-271

[34] Galappaththi EK, Nayak PK (2017) Two faces of shrimp aquaculture: commonising vs. decommonising effects of a wicked driver. Maritime Studies 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0066-4

[35] Garcia-Alonso L, González-Laxe F, Sanchez RJ (2025) Sustainability, externalities and ocean grabbing: Pressing challenges for maritime transport. Mar Policy 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106598

[36] Gerhardinger LC, Colonese AC, Martini RG, et al (2024) Networked media and information ocean literacy: a transformative approach for UN ocean decade. NPJ Ocean Sustainability 3:. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-023-00038-2

[37] Gerhardinger LC, Ribaric A, Gabani Gimenez B, et al (2022) Baffling Shades of Blue Addressing the impacts of the Blue Economy on small-scale fisheries in Latin America. ICSF PUBLICATION

[38] Germond-Duret C. Framing the Blue Economy: Placelessness, Development and Sustainability. Dev Change, 2022, 53: 308-334

[39] Gianelli I, Trimble M, Juri S, et al (2024) Envisioning desirable futures in small-scale fisheries: a transdisciplinary arts-based co-creation process. Ecology and Society 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14869-290120

[40] Harvey D (2004) The “New” Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession. Socialist Register 63–87

[41] Hichert T, Biggs R, de Vos A (2022) Futures analysis. In: Biggs R, de Vos A, Preiser R, et al (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems. Taylor & Francis Group, pp 148–162

[42] Hill R, Williams KJ, Pert PL, et al.. Adaptive community-based biodiversity conservation in Australia’s tropical rainforests. Environ Conserv, 2010, 37: 73-82

[43] IBGE (2024) IBGE Cidades. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/. Accessed 10 Mar 2025

[44] Jankowsky M, Machado IC (in press) Co-construction of knowledge on the environmental impacts of large enterprises based on the knowledge and experiences of artisanal fishers. In: Mesquita, B, Medeiros, RP, Mattos, S; Small-Scale Fisheries in Brazil: Transformations, Methods and Governance. TBTI Global Book Series.

[45] Jentoft S. Limits of governability: Institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance. Mar Policy, 2007, 31: 360-370

[46] Jentoft S, Bavinck M. Reconciling human rights and customary law: legal pluralism in the governance of small-scale fisheries. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 2019, 51: 271-291

[47] Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R. Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Mar Policy, 2009, 33: 553-560

[48] Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R. Interactive Learning and Governance Transformation for Securing Blue Justice for Small-Scale Fisheries. Adm Soc, 2022, 54: 1255-1282

[49] Johnson DS. Category, narrative, and value in the governance of small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy, 2006, 30: 747-756

[50] Johnson DS. Institutional adaptation as a governability problem in fisheries: patron-client relations in the Junagadh fishery, India. Fish Fish, 2010, 11: 264-277

[51] Juruna JJP, da Cruz e Silva R, dos Reis OB, et al (2025) Socioenvironmental impacts of the Belo Monte hydroelectric power plant as revealed by Indigenous and ribeirinho monitoring. Conservation Biology 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70043

[52] Kooiman J, Bavinck M, Jentoft S, Pullin R (2005) Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. Amsterdam University Press

[53] Kooiman J, Jentoft S. Meta-governance: Values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Adm, 2009, 87: 818-836

[54] Lawrence MG, Williams S, Nanz P, Renn O. Characteristics, potentials, and challenges of transdisciplinary research. One Earth, 2022, 5: 44-61

[55] Machado IC, Jankowsky M (2025) Território Pesqueiro. In: Entre Marés: Retratos da Pesca Artesanal na Baixada Santista. pp 9–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16883876

[56] Márquez Pérez AI. “They Are Taking the Sea from us” - Maritime Extractivism, Dispossession and Resistance in Rural and Ethnic Communities of the Colombian Caribbean. Lat Am Perspect, 2024, 51: 111-130

[57] Martins IM, Prado DS, Gonçalves LR, et al (2023). Ocean conflicts for whom and why? Participatory conflict assessment in the southeast coast of Brazil. Maritime Studies 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-023-00331-3

[58] McKinley E, Burdon D, Shellock RJ (2023) The evolution of ocean literacy: A new framework for the United Nations Ocean Decade and beyond. Mar Pollut Bull 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114467

[59] Mirlean N, Calliari L, Johannesson K (2020) Dredging in an estuary causes contamination by fluid mud on a tourist ocean beach. Evidence via REE ratios. Mar Pollut Bull 159:111495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111495

[60] Nash KL, van Putten I, Alexander KA et al (2022) Oceans and society: feedbacks between ocean and human health. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-021-09669-5

[61] Narchi NE, Moura GGM, Leddy G. Blue Economies and Ocean Grabbing in Latin America. Lat Am Perspect, 2024, 51: 5-25

[62] Newing H. Conducting Research in Conservation, 2010Routledge

[63] Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, Daw TM, et al (2015) Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies. Ecology and Society 20:art32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07985-200432

[64] Pardal A, Christofoletti RA, Martinez AS (2024) Urbanisation on the coastline of the most populous and developed state of Brazil: the extent of coastal hardening and occupations in low-elevation zones. Anthropocene Coasts 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44218-024-00048-8

[65] Peterson GD, Cumming GS, Carpenter SR. Scenario Planning: a Tool for Conservation in an Uncertain World. Conserv Biol, 2003, 17: 358-366

[66] Poffo ÍRF. Acidentes ambientais em áreas portuárias: Percepção de risco e reações na visão ecossistêmica, 2021, Curitiba, Brazil Publishing

[67] Prado DS, Rodrigues LM, Mendonça ÉS, et al.. Revelando as interações entre a pesca artesanal e a economia azul no Brasil. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 2025, 66: 162-179

[68] Quaresma A, Zuquim G, Demarchi LO, et al (2025) Belo Monte Dam impacts: Protagonism of local people in research and monitoring reveals ecosystem service decay in Amazonian flooded vegetation. Perspect Ecol Conserv

[69] Reid AJ, Eckert LE, Lane JF, et al.. “Two-Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management. Fish Fish, 2021, 22: 243-261

[70] Satumantpan S, Chuenpagdee R. Interactive Governance for the Sustainability of Marine and Coastal Resources in Thailand#. Environ Nat Resour J, 2022, 20: 543-552

[71] Shackleton S, Bezerra JC, Cockburn J, et al (2022) Interviews and surveys. In: Biggs R, Preiser R, de Vos A, et al (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems.

[72] Sieber SS, Medeiros PM, Albuquerque UP. Local Perception of Environmental Change in a Semi-Arid Area of Northeast Brazil: A New Approach for the Use of Participatory Methods at the Level of Family Units. J Agric Environ Ethics, 2011, 24: 511-531

[73] Silver JJ, Gray NJ, Campbell LM, et al.. Blue Economy and Competing Discourses in International Oceans Governance. J Environ Dev, 2015, 24: 135-160

[74] Silver JJ, Okamoto DK, Armitage D, et al.. Fish, People, and Systems of Power: Understanding and Disrupting Feedback between Colonialism and Fisheries Science. Am Nat, 2022, 200: 168-180

[75] Soltanpour Y, Peri I, Temri L. Co-Management of Fisheries Through a Negotiation Lens: The Case of Prud’homies. Maritime Studies, 2020, 19: 167-178

[76] Song AM, Soliman A. Situating human rights in the context of fishing rights – Contributions and contradictions. Mar Policy, 2019, 103: 19-26

[77] Steenbergen DJ, Fabinyi M, Barclay K, et al.. Governance interactions in small-scale fisheries market chains: Examples from the Asia-Pacific. Fish Fish, 2019, 20: 697-714

[78] Thoya P, Horigue V, Möllmann C, et al (2022) Policy gaps in the East African Blue economy: Perspectives of small-scale fishers on port development in Kenya and Tanzania. Front Mar Sci 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.933111

[79] Wenger AS, Harvey E, Wilson S, et al.. A critical analysis of the direct effects of dredging on fish. Fish Fish, 2017, 18: 967-985

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)