Delineating spatiotemporal variations of coastal ecosystem service value from the ‘past-current-future’ perspective

Abstract

Insufficient understanding of coastal natural resources hinders the efforts to reconcile economic development and ecological protection. The dynamics of ecosystem service value (ESV) needs to be assessed for opening opportunities in understanding the ecological consequences of human activities. This study identifies the spatiotemporal patterns of ESV from the “past-present-future” perspective, coupling hotspot analysis, geo-detector and patch-generating land simulation model into the framework of ESV assessment. Land use resources in Liaoning coastal zone over past two decades that are utilized for wetlands (-31.86%), croplands (-11.38%) and grasslands (-4.76%) decreased to different degrees, whereas built-up lands increased by 100.02%. The magnitude of coastal ESVs is 149.41 billion CNY over past two decades average, and has shown constant fluctuations as a consequence of land use changes. The distribution of ESVs evolved towards greater coverage of cold spots and smaller hot spot areas during 2000–2020 year. Watersheds and wetlands with 13.25% and 3.77% of total area contribute 70.37% and 8.29% of total ESVs, respectively, especially in water supply, hydrological regulation, and biodiversity. Compared to 2020 year, the value of ESVs in 2050 year increased to 212.72 and 311.48 billion CNY for economic and ecological (maximize ecosystem service/ecological capacity) scenarios, respectively, whereas decreased to 89.14 billion CNY for baseline scenario. Intense human activities are going to reshape the patterns of ESV generated from coastal natural resources. These findings provide timely and precisely evidence for balancing ecological protection and economic development in the context of Liaoning coastal construction from now on.

Keywords

Land use changes / Liaoning coastal zone / Ecosystem service value / Driving factors / Multi-scenarios simulation

References

[1] Acharya RP, Maraseni T, Cockfield G. Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation–an analysis of publications. Ecosystem Serv, 2019, 39: 100979

[2] Asadolahi Z, Salmanmahiny A, Sakieh Y, Mirkarimi SH, Baral H, Azimi M. Dynamic trade-off analysis of multiple ecosystem services under land use change scenarios: towards putting ecosystem services into planning in Iran. Ecol Complex, 2018, 36: 250-260

[3] Ayinuer Y, Zhou W, Wang J, Wang J. Impact of urbanization on regional ecosystem services–a case study in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Ecol Indic, 2024, 159: 111633

[4] Balasubramanian M. Economic value of regulating ecosystem services: a comprehensive at the global level review. Environ Monit Assess, 2019, 191(10): 616

[5] Bastin J-F, Finegold Y, Garcia C, Mollicone D, Rezende M, Routh D, Zohner CM, Crowther TW. The global tree restoration potential. Science, 2019, 365644876-79

[6] Bateman IJ, Harwood AR, Mace GM, Watson RT, Abson DJ, Andrews B, Binner A, Crowe A, Day BH, Dugdale S, Fezzi C, Foden J, Hadley D, Haines-Young R, Hulme M, Kontoleon A, Lovett AA, Munday P, Pascual U, Paterson J, Perino G, Sen A, Siriwardena G, van Soest D, Termansen M. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science, 2013, 341(6141): 45-50

[7] Baustert P, Othoniel B, Rugani B, Leopold U. Uncertainty analysis in integrated environmental models for ecosystem service assessments: frameworks, challenges and gaps. Ecosystem Serv, 2018, 33: 110-123

[8] Bevilacqua S, Terlizzi A, Mistri M, Munari C. New frameworks for species surrogacy in monitoring highly variable coastal ecosystems: applying the BestAgg approach to Mediterranean coastal lagoons. Ecol Indic, 2015, 52: 207-218

[9] Carlucci MB, Brancalion PHS, Rodrigues RR, Loyola R, Cianciaruso MV. Functional traits and ecosystem services in ecological restoration. Restor Ecol, 2020, 28(6): 1372-1383

[10] Cen X, Zhang H. Impacts of multi-scenario land use change on ecosystem services and ecological security pattern: a case study of the Yellow River Delta. Research in Cold and Arid Regions, 2024, 16(1): 30-44

[11] Chillo V, Vázquez DP, Amoroso MM, Bennett EM. Land-use intensity indirectly affects ecosystem services mainly through plant functional identity in a temperate forest. Funct Ecol, 2018, 32(5): 1390-1399

[12] Costanza R. Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability. Ecosystem Serv, 2020, 43: 101096

[13] Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260

[14] Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?. Ecosyst Serv, 2017, 28: 1-16

[15] Cui J, Lian X, Huntingford C, Gimeno L, Wang T, Ding J, He M, Xu H, Chen A, Gentine P, Piao S. Global water availability boosted by vegetation-driven changes in atmospheric moisture transport. Nat Geosci, 2022, 15(12): 982-988

[16] Cusens J, Barraclough AD, Måren IE. Socio-cultural values and biophysical supply: how do afforestation and land abandonment impact multiple ecosystem services?. Land Use Policy, 2024, 136: 106967

[17] Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ, 2009, 7(1): 21-28

[18] de Moura MS, da Silva VC, Pacheco FAL, Fernandes LFS, Pissarra TCT, da Costa AM. Beyond land use planning and ecosystem services assessment with the conservation use potential framework: a study in the Upper Rio das Velhas basin, Brazil. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 923: 171437

[19] Dee LE, Miller SJ, Helmstedt KJ, Boersma KS, Polasky S, Reich PB. Quantifying disturbance effects on ecosystem services in a changing climate. Nat Ecol Evol, 2025, 9(3): 436-447

[20] Evans RG, Sadler EJ (2008) Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water use. Water Resour Res 44(7):W00E04. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006200

[21] Felipe-Lucia MR, Soliveres S, Penone C, Fischer M, Ammer C, Boch S, Boeddinghaus RS, Bonkowski M, Buscot F, Fiore-Donno AM, Frank K, Goldmann K, Gossner MM, Hölzel N, Jochum M, Kandeler E, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, Leimer S, Manning P, Oelmann Y, Saiz H, Schall P, Schloter M, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Solly EF, Stempfhuber B, Weisser WW, Wilcke W, Wubet T, Allan E. Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020, 117(45): 28140-28149

[22] Fu B, Zhang L, Xu Z, Zhao Y, Wei Y, Skinner D. Ecosystem services in changing land use. J Soils Sediments, 2015, 15(4): 833-843

[23] Fu B, Meadows ME, Zhao W. Geography in the anthropocene: transforming our world for sustainable development. Geogr Sustain, 2022, 3(1): 1-6

[24] Fu B, Liu Y, Meadows ME. Ecological restoration for sustainable development in China. Natl Sci Rev, 2023, 10(7): nwad033

[25] Fu B, Zhang L (2014) Land-use change and ecosystem services: concepts, methods and progress. Prog Geogr 33(4):441–446. https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001

[26] Guo X, Zhang Y, Guo D, Lu W, Xu H. How does ecological protection redline policy affect regional land use and ecosystem services?. Environ Impact Assess Rev, 2023, 100: 107062

[27] Hamel P, Bryant BP. Uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services analyses: seven challenges and practical responses. Ecosystem Serv, 2017, 24: 1-15

[28] Hasan SS, Zhen L, Miah MG, Ahamed T, Samie A. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: a review. Environ Dev, 2020, 34: 100527

[29] Hou X, Song B, Zhang X, Wang X, Li D. Multi-scenario simulation and spatial-temporal analysis of LUCC in China’s coastal zone based on coupled SD-FLUS model. Chin Geogr Sci, 2024, 34(4): 579-598

[30] Hua F, Wang X, Zheng X, Fisher B, Wang L, Zhu J, Tang Y, Yu DW, Wilcove DS. Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world’s largest reforestation programme. Nat Commun, 2016, 7(1): 12717

[31] Jiang W, Wu T, Fu B. The value of ecosystem services in China: a systematic review for twenty years. Ecosystem Serv, 2021, 52: 101365

[32] Ke Y, Bai Y, Ali M, Ashraf A, Li M, Li B. Exploring residents' perceptions of ecosystem services in nature reserves to guide protection and management. Ecol Indic, 2024, 158: 111535

[33] Khamis ZA, Kalliola R, Käyhkö N. Geographical characterization of the Zanzibar coastal zone and its management perspectives. Ocean Coast Manage, 2017, 149: 116-134

[34] La Notte A, D’Amato D, Mäkinen H, Paracchini ML, Liquete C, Egoh B, Geneletti D, Crossman ND. Ecosystem services classification: a systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecol Indic, 2017, 74: 392-402

[35] Leung LR, Wigmosta MS, Ghan SJ, Epstein DJ, Vail LW. Application of a subgrid orographic precipitation/surface hydrology scheme to a mountain watershed. J Geophys Res Atmos, 1996, 101(D8): 12803-12817

[36] Li T, Shilling F, Thorne J, Li F, Schott H, Boynton R, Berry AM. Fragmentation of China’s landscape by roads and urban areas. Landscape Ecol, 2010, 25(6): 839-853

[37] Liang X, Guan Q, Clarke KC, Liu S, Wang B, Yao Y. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: a case study in Wuhan, China. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 2021, 85: 101569

[38] Lin W, Xu D, Guo P, Wang D, Li L, Gao J. Exploring variations of ecosystem service value in Hangzhou Bay Wetland, eastern China. Ecosyst Serv, 2019, 37: 100944

[39] Liu Y, Ming D, Yang J. Optimization of land use structure based on ecological GREEN equivalent. Geo-Spat Inf Sci, 2002, 5(4): 60-67

[40] Liu S, Zhang P, Jiang X, Lo K. Measuring sustainable urbanization in China: a case study of the coastal Liaoning area. Sustain Sci, 2013, 8(4): 585-594

[41] Liu C, Yan X, Han Z, Liu Y, Li X, Li X, Zhong J. Guiding and constraining reclamation for coastal zone through identification of response thresholds for ecosystem services supply–demand relationships. Land Degrad Dev, 2024, 35(5): 1804-1817

[42] Liu Z, Chang Y, Pan S, Zhang P, Tian L, Chen Z. Unfolding the spatial spillover effect of urbanization on composite ecosystem services: a case study in cities of Yellow River Basin. Ecol Indic, 2024, 158: 111521

[43] Luan C, Liu R, Zhang Q, Sun J, Liu J. Multi-objective land use optimization based on integrated NSGA–II–PLUS model: comprehensive consideration of economic development and ecosystem services value enhancement. J Clean Prod, 2024, 434: 140306

[44] Ma Y, Yang J. A review of methods for quantifying urban ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plann, 2025, 253: 105215

[45] Ma X, Zhang P, Yang L, Qi Y, Liu J, Liu L, Fan X, Hou K. Assessing the relative contributions, combined effects and multiscale uncertainty of future land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Southwest China using a novel integrated modelling framework. Sustain Cities Soc, 2024, 106: 105400

[46] Malinga R, Gordon LJ, Jewitt G, Lindborg R. Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents – a review. Ecosyst Serv, 2015, 13: 57-63

[47] Mendoza-González G, Martínez ML, Lithgow D, Pérez-Maqueo O, Simonin P. Land use change and its effects on the value of ecosystem services along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Ecol Econ, 2012, 82: 23-32

[48] Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw M. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ, 2009, 7(1): 4-11

[49] Niu J, Mao C, Xiang J. Based on ecological footprint and ecosystem service value, research on ecological compensation in Anhui Province, China. Ecol Indic, 2024, 158: 111341

[50] Pablo A-V, Fernando P-C, Jimmy P-U. Ecosystem services and uses of dune systems of the coast of the Araucanía Region, Chile: A perception study. Ocean Coast Manag, 2021, 200: 105450

[51] Perumal L, New MG, Jonas M, Liu W. The impact of roads on sub-Saharan African ecosystems: a systematic review. Environ Res Lett, 2021, 16(11): 113001

[52] Qi Y, Lian X, Wang H, Zhang J, Yang R. Dynamic mechanism between human activities and ecosystem services: a case study of Qinghai lake watershed, China. Ecol Indic, 2020, 117: 106528

[53] Qiu J, Carpenter SR, Booth EG, Motew M, Kucharik CJ. Spatial and temporal variability of future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Landsc Ecol, 2020, 35112569-2586

[54] Ramesh R, Chen Z, Cummins V, Day J, D’Elia C, Dennison B, Forbes DL, Glaeser B, Glaser M, Glavovic B, Kremer H, Lange M, Larsen JN, Le Tissier M, Newton A, Pelling M, Purvaja R, Wolanski E. Land-ocean interactions in the coastal zone: past, present & future. Anthropocene, 2015, 12: 85-98

[55] Runting RK, Bryan BA, Dee LE, Maseyk FJF, Mandle L, Hamel P, Wilson KA, Yetka K, Possingham HP, Rhodes JR. Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: a review. Glob Change Biol, 2017, 23(1): 28-41

[56] Schirpke U, Tasser E, Borsky S, Braun M, Eitzinger J, Gaube V, Getzner M, Glatzel S, Gschwantner T, Kirchner M, Leitinger G, Mehdi-Schulz B, Mitter H, Scheifinger H, Thaler S, Thom D, Thaler T. Past and future impacts of land-use changes on ecosystem services in Austria. J Environ Manage, 2023, 345: 118728

[57] Taddeo S, Dronova I, Depsky N. Spectral vegetation indices of wetland greenness: responses to vegetation structure, composition, and spatial distribution. Remote Sens Environ, 2019, 234: 111467

[58] Uehara T, Sakurai R, Tsuge T. Cultivating relational values and sustaining socio-ecological production landscapes through ocean literacy: a study on Satoumi. Environ Dev Sustain, 2020, 22(2): 1599-1616

[59] Wang X, Zhao X (2023) Impacts of human activities on ecosystem services in national parks: a case study of Qilian Mountain National Park. J Nat Resour 38(4):966–982. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20230409. (In Chinese)

[60] Wang W, Guo H, Chuai X, Dai C, Lai L, Zhang M. The impact of land use change on the temporospatial variations of ecosystems services value in China and an optimized land use solution. Environ Sci Policy, 2014, 44: 62-72

[61] Wang J, Zhang T, Fu B. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecol Indic, 2016, 67: 250-256

[62] Wang Y, Gan Y, Deng Y, Xie X (2020) Land-ocean interactions and their eco-environmental effects in the coastal zone: current progress and future perspectives. Bull Geol Sci Technol 39(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2020.0101. (In Chinese)

[63] Wei L, Mao M, Zhao Y, Wu G, Wang H, Li M, Liu T, Wei Y, Huang S, Huang L, Gong W, Wang W. Spatio-temporal characteristics and multi-scenario simulation analysis of ecosystem service value in coastal wetland: a case study of the coastal zone of Hainan Island, China. J Environ Manage, 2024, 368: 122199

[64] Wu S, Guo Z, Askar A, Li X, Hu Y, Li H, Saria AE. Dynamic land cover and ecosystem service changes in global coastal deltas under future climate scenarios. Ocean Coast Manage, 2024, 258: 107384

[65] Xie G, Zhang C, Zhang L, Chen W, Li S (2015) Improvement of valuation method of ecosystem services based on equivalent factor of unit area value. J Nat Resour 30(8):1243–1254. https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001 (In Chinese)

[66] Xu X, Chen M, Yang G, Jiang B, Zhang J. Wetland ecosystem services research: a critical review. Glob Ecol Conserv, 2020, 22: e01027

[67] Xu Y, Zhao X, Huang P, Pu J, Ran Y, Zhou S, Zhao Q, Feng Y, Tang Y, Tao J, Zhang Y. A new framework for multi-level territorial spatial zoning management: integrating ecosystem services supply-demand balance and land use structure. J Clean Prod, 2024, 441: 141053

[68] Yang Q, Liu G, Hao Y, Zhang L, Giannetti BF, Wang J, Casazza M. Donor-side evaluation of coastal and marine ecosystem services. Water Res, 2019, 166: 115028

[69] Yao Y, Jia C, Xue Y, Su P, Song Y. Deciphering the uncertainties in ecosystem service value: an innovative protocol focused on ecological traits. J Environ Manage, 2025, 393: 127031

[70] Yuan S, Mei Z, Zhu C, Cao R, Li S, Yang L, Su Y, Li W. Investigating the spatio-temporal interactive relationship between land use structure and ecosystem services in urbanizing China. Ecol Indic, 2024, 158: 111315

[71] Yue W, Yao Y, Su M, Rong Q, Xu C. Identifying distributions of urban ecosystem health based on Latin-hypercube sampling and multi-criteria decision analysis framework. Ecol Indic, 2023, 147: 109957

[72] Zhang Y, Lu Y. Opportunities and challenges of Liaoning's economic development under the background of free trade zone construction. Adv Soc Sci Educ Hum Res, 2019, 334: 214-220

[73] Zhang W, Chang WJ, Zhu ZC, Hui Z. Landscape ecological risk assessment of Chinese coastal cities based on land use change. Appl Geogr, 2020, 117: 102174

[74] Zhang M, Lin H, Long X, Cai Y. Analyzing the spatiotemporal pattern and driving factors of wetland vegetation changes using 2000–2019 time-series Landsat data. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 780: 146615

[75] Zhang L, Shi L, Yang F. Assessing ecosystem service dynamics in China's coastal shelterbelt: implications for ecosystem restoration. Environ Impact Assess Rev, 2024, 106: 107515

[76] Zhang S, Chen Y, Zhou X, Zhang Y. Climate and human impact together drive changes in ecosystem multifunctionality in the drylands of China. Appl Soil Ecol, 2024, 193: 105163

[77] Zhao Y, Liu Z, Wu J. Grassland ecosystem services: a systematic review of research advances and future directions. Landsc Ecol, 2020, 35(4): 793-814

[78] Zhao J, Xiu Y, Cui W (2020a) An empirical study on marine economic efficiency of the Liaoning coastal economic belt. J Coast Res 325–328. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI106-075.1

Funding

International Engineering Research Institute of Urban and Energy Environment in Liaoning University (LNUUEE2021001)

Liaoning Intercollegiate Joint Training Program for General Universities (2021)

Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program(XLYC1802070)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)