Laparoscopic nerve-sparing cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic sigmoid neobladder formation

Salman Hasunovich Al-Shukri; Aleksandr Anatolyevich Zaharenko; Adel Salmanovich Al-Shukri; Yevgeniy Stanislavovich Nevirovich; Vladislav Yakovlevich Dubinskiy; Maria Kirillovna Potapova

doi:10.17816/uroved5443-48

Urology reports (St. - Petersburg) ›› 2015, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) :43 -48. DOI: 10.17816/uroved5443-48

Articles

research-article

Laparoscopic nerve-sparing cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic sigmoid neobladder formation

Author information +

History +

PDF (1650KB)

Abstract

The following clinical case is presented: performing of minimally invasive laparoscopic nerve-sparing cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic sigmoid neobladder formation for patient aged 62 with invasive bladder cancer. This case proves that the performed method of urine derivation is safe and can be used as alternative to other techniques in patients who underwent radical laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy.

Keywords

radical cystoprostatectomy / bladder cancer / orthotopic neobladder

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Salman Hasunovich Al-Shukri, Aleksandr Anatolyevich Zaharenko, Adel Salmanovich Al-Shukri, Yevgeniy Stanislavovich Nevirovich, Vladislav Yakovlevich Dubinskiy, Maria Kirillovna Potapova. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic sigmoid neobladder formation. Urology reports (St. - Petersburg), 2015, 5(4): 43-48 DOI:10.17816/uroved5443-48

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Аль-Шукри С. Х., Корнеев И. А. Общие принципы лечения больных раком мочевого пузыря. Значение клинических, гистологических и биологических факторов прогноза для выбора метода лечения // Практическая онкология. 2003. Т. 4. № 4. С. 204-213.

[2]	Bruins H. M., Arends T. J., Pelkman M. et al. Radical cystectomy in a Dutch University hospital: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in a homogeneous surgery-only series // Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014. Vol. 12. N 3. P. 190-195.

[3]	Петров С. Б., Левковский Н. С., Король В. Д., Паршин А. Г. Радикальная цистэктомия как основной метод лечения мышечно-инвазивного рака мочевого пузыря (показания, особенности техники, профилактика осложнений) // Практическая онкология. 2003. Т. 4. № 4. С. 225-230.

[4]	Novara G., De Marco V., Aragona M. et al. Complications and mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder transitional cell cancer // J Urol. 2009. Vol. 182. N 3. P. 914-921.

[5]	Zakaria A. S., Santos F., Dragomir A. et al. Postoperative mortality and complications after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Quebec: A population-based analysis during the years 2000-2009 // Can Urol Assoc J. 2014. Vol. 8. N 7-8. P 259-267.

[6]	Носов А. К., Рева С. А., Джалилов И. Б., Петров С. Б. Радикальная цистэктомия при раке мочевого пузыря: сравнение ранних хирургических осложнений при лапароскопической, открытой и видеоассистированной операции // Онкоурология. 2015. Т. 11. N 3. С. 71-78.

[7]	Aboumarzouk O. M., Hughes O., Narahari K. et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer // J Endourol. 2013. Vol. 27. N 9. P. 1083-1095.

[8]	Tang K., Li H., Xia D. et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies // PLoS One. 2014. Vol. 9. N 5. P. e95667

[9]	Fonseka T., Ahmed K., Froghi S. et al. Comparing robotic, laparoscopic and open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015. Vol. 87. N 1. P. 41-48.

[10]	Albisinni S., Rassweiler J., Abbou C. C. et al. Long-term analysis of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in Europe: results from a multicentre study by the European Association of Urology (EAU) section of Uro-technology // BJU Int. 2015. Vol. 115. N 6. P. 937-945.

[11]	Shao P., Li P., Ju X. et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: technique and clinical outcomes // Urology. 2015. Vol. 85. N 2. P. 368-373.

[12]	Miyake H., Furukawa J., Sakai I. et al. Orthotopic sigmoid vs. ileal neobladders in Japanese patients: a comparative assessment of complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life // Urol Oncol. 2013. Vol. 31. N 7. P. 1155-1160.

[13]	Liu D., Feng F., Shen Z. et al. Clinical experience in a modified Roux-Y-shaped sigmoid neobladder: assessment of complications and voiding patterns in 43 patients // BJU Int. 2010. Vol. 105. N 4. P. 533-538.

[14]	Xu K., Liu C. X., Zheng S. B. et al. Orthotopic detaenial sigmoid neobladder after radical cystectomy: technical considerations, complications and functional outcomes // J Urol. 2013. Vol. 190. N 3. P. 928-934.

[15]	Singh V., Yadav R., Sinha R. J., Gupta D. K. Prospective comparison of quality-of-life outcomes between ileal conduit urinary diversion and orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy: a statistical model // BJU Int. 2014. Vol. 113. N 5. P. 726-732.

[16]	Miyake H., Furukawa J., Muramaki M. et al. Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy: comparative study between orthotopic sigmoid versus ileal neobladders // Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012. Vol. 38. N 11. P. 1089-1094.