THE REASONS AND WAYS OF NEGLEKTA AND “REPULSION” SYNDROMES ELIMINATION IN PATIENTS AFTER STROKE — FACTORS, WHICH PREVENT ADEQUATE REHABILITATION
V. V Kovalchuk , G. I Shvartsman , A. O Gusev
Medical and Social Expert Evaluation and Rehabilitation ›› 2013, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 50 -53.
THE REASONS AND WAYS OF NEGLEKTA AND “REPULSION” SYNDROMES ELIMINATION IN PATIENTS AFTER STROKE — FACTORS, WHICH PREVENT ADEQUATE REHABILITATION
Research is devoted to the influence of neglekta and "repulsion" syndromes on the degree of recovery of patients after stroke and the level of domestic adaptation, as well as assessing the effectiveness of patients compliance with these syndromes. Results of825 patients treatment. According to the study, the neglekta syndrome as well as "repulsion" syndrome significantly reduce the effectiveness of rehabilitation, while compliance with the rules of management of patients with these syndromes is an effective management of patients after stroke.
stroke / rehabilitation / neglekta syndrome / "repulsion" syndrome
| [1] |
Луцкий М. А. Программа по снижению смертности и инвалидности от инсультов в Воронежском регионе Российской Федерации. Журн. неврол. и психиатр. Прил.: Инсульт 2007; спецвып.: 50—51. |
| [2] |
Помников В. Г. Течение и исходы церебрального инфаркта у лиц молодого возраста на фоне алкогольной интоксикации. Журн. неврол. и психиатр. Прил.: Инсульт 2007; спецвып.: 335. |
| [3] |
Culebras A. Stroke is a preventable catastrophic disease. Журн. неврол. и психиатр. Прил.: Инсульт 2007; спецвып. 75—76. |
| [4] |
Иванова Г. Е., Шкловский В. М., Петрова Е. А. и др. Принципы организации ранней реабилитации больных с инсультом. Качество жизни. Медицина 2006; 2 (13): 62—70. |
| [5] |
Скворцова В. И., Евзельман М. А. Ишемический инсульт. Орел; 2006. |
| [6] |
Warlow C. P., Dennis., van Gjn J. et al. Stroke. A practical guide to management / Warlow C. P., Dennis M. S., van Gijn J. et al. London: Blackwell Science; 1997. |
| [7] |
Stone C. P., Halligan P W., Greenwood R. J. The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disordes in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age and Ageing 1993; 22: 46—52. |
| [8] |
Мультидисциплинарный подход в ведении и ранней реабилитации неврологических больных: Метод. пособие. Ч. 6: Эрготерапия / Камаева О. В., Монро П., Буракова З. Ф. и др.; под ред. А. А. Скоромца. СПб.; 2003. |
| [9] |
Шевченко Л. А. Особенности клинико-патофизиологической структуры motorneglect у лиц с мозговым супратенториальным инсультом. Журн. неврол. и психиатр. Прил.: Инсульт 2007; спецвып.: 356. |
| [10] |
Denes G., Semenza C., Stoppa E. et al. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow up study. Brain 1982; 105: 543—552. |
| [11] |
Kinsella G., Ford B. Hemiinattention and the recovery patterns of stroke patients. Intern. Rehabil. Med. 1985; 7: 102—106. |
| [12] |
Karnath H. O., Johannsen L., Broetz D. et al. Prognosis of contraversive pushing. J. Neurol. 2002; 249 (9): 1250—1253. |
| [13] |
Roller M. L. The ‘Pusher Syndrome’. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2004; 28 (1): 29—34. |
| [14] |
Мультидисциплинарный подход в ведении и ранней реабилитации неврологических больных: Метод. пособие. Ч. 5: Физическая терапия / Камаева О. В., Монро П., Буракова З. Ф. и др.; под ред. А.А. Скоромца. СПб.; 2003. |
| [15] |
Machoney F., Barthel D. Functional evalution: the Barthel Index. Md St. Med. J. 1965; 14: 61—65. |
| [16] |
Lindmark B. Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke with special emphasis on motor function and activities of daily living. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 1988; 21: 1—40. |
| [17] |
Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke: background and study protocol. Stroke 1985; 16: 885—890. |
| [18] |
Kwantabisa N. Occupational therapy ADL checklist self maintenance. In: Merton and Sutton community NHS trust. Stroke rehabilitation team protocol. London; 1999: 7—9. |
Eco-Vector
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |