The importance of metrosalpingography in gynecology

Abstract

In the diagnosis of gynecological diseases, the data of anamnesis, physical examination and histological mapping are successfully used. However, to facilitate and clarify the diagnosis of diseases of the female genital sphere, a number of methods have been proposed using X-rays of new rays. The first attempts, however, did not justify themselves and were not widely used in gynecological practice. These methods are currently abandoned, mainly due to the highly irritating effect of solutions on the peritoneum and mucous membrane of the uterus and tubes, and partly due to the insufficiently clear shadows obtained in the image when they are used.

Keywords

Kazan Medical archive

References

[1] Русская.

[2] Арнштам и Рейнберг. Вест. рент, и рад., т. IV, в. 4, стр. 189, 1926.

[3] Гинзбург и Строков. Жур. ак. и жен. бол.» т. 38, кн. 6, стр. 673, 1927.

[4] Гогоберидзе. Жур. ак. и жен. бол., т. 40, кн. 5, стр. 678, 1929.

[5] Лейбчик. Каз. мед. жур., № 5, стр. 531,1929.

[6] Одишария и Закржевский. Вест, рентг. и рад. т. 5, вып. 4, стр. 295, 1927.

[7] Побединский. Сборн. „Новые данные в области противозачаточных средств 44 ст. 33, ГИЗ 1931.

[8] Рейнберг и Арнштам. Вест. рент, и рад. т. 4, в. 4, ст. 179, 1926.

[9] Сердюков. Жур. ак. и жен. бол. т. 38, кн. 1, ст. 1,1927.

[10] Иностранная *)

[11] Albano. Zbl. f. Gyn. № 30, S. 1894, 1929.

[12] Ci. Béclè- re. La pr. med. № 50, P. 791, 1928.

[13] Bée 1ère. Rev. fr. d. gyn. et. d’obst, № 7, -p. 458, 1928.

[14] Bakke. Zbl. f. d. ges. Rad. B. 4, H. 8, S. 505. 1928.

[15] Cadura. Dissertation. 1926.

[16] Darbоiset Béс1ère. La lanc. fr. № 27, p. 523, 1929.

[17] Ecke. Arch. f. Gyn. Bb. 129, S. 204, 1926.

[18] Francillon- Lobreet Dalsace. Soc. d’obst. et de gyn. de Paris. № 1, P. 62, 1929.

[19] Franci1оn-Lobreet Dalsace. Le scalp. № 3, P. 57,1930.

[20] Finley. Surg., gyn. and obst. V. 52, № 3, P. 723, 1931.

[21] Geist and Goldberger. Surg., gyn. and obst., V. 41, № 11, P. 646, 1925.

[22] Guyot. Rev. fr. de gyn. et «d’obst. №12, P. 689, 1928.

[23] Graff. Wien. kl. Wochensch. №43, S. 1378, 1929.

[24] Hamant. Rev. fr. de gyn. et d’obst. № 2. p. 81, 1929.

[25] Heuser. Fort. Rö. Str., Kongressheft, Bd. 38, S. 31, 1928.

[26] Herrnstein. Zbl. f. gyn. №29, S. 1823, 1928.

[27] Hirsch. The j. of the Amer. med. assoc. V. 90, №6, P. 458, 1928.

[28] Hoffmann. Zbl. f. Gyn. №44, S. 2776, 1930.

[29] Jarcho. Surg, gyn. and obst, V. 46, № 6, P. 752, 1928.

[30] Jarcho. Surg., Gyn. and obst., V. 48, № 1, P. 33, 1929.

[31] Коk. Zbl. f. Gyn. № 1, S. 26, 1929.

[32] Коk. Zbl. f. Gyn., № 16, S. 962, 1929.

[33] Kennedy. The J. Amer. med. assoc., V. 85, № 1, P. 13. 1925.

[34] Mocqout et Bureau. La pr. med. № 100, P. 1525, 1927.

[35] Mandler. Fort. Rö. Str. Bd. 39, H. 2, S. 296, 1929.

[36] Mikulicz- Radecki. Zbl. f. Gyn. № 35, S. 2183, 1930.

[37] Моеneh. The j. of Amer, med. assoc. V. 89, № 7. P. 522, 1927.

[38] Nahmmacher. Surg., gyn. and obst. V. 48, № 1, P. 33, 1929.

[39] Nahmmacher. Zbl. f. d. ges. Med. № 35, S. 2238, 1926.

[40] Novak. Zbl. f. d. ges. Med. № 48, S. 3013, 1930.

[41] O11. Zbl. f. Gyn. № 10, S. 546, 1925.-

[42] O11оw. Zbl. f. Gyn. № 50, S. 3204,1928.

[43] Popovic. Fort. Rö. Str. Bd. 37. H. 5, S. 677, 1928.

[44] Rubin. Surg, gyn. and. obst. V. 46, № 1, P. 87, 1928.

[45] Bubin. Arch. f. Gyn. Bd. 138, H. 1, 1929.

[46] Saidl. Zbl. f. Gyn. № 32, S. 2064, 1929.

[47] Sacek. Zbl. f. Gyn. № 42. S. 2679, 1930 (Ref.).

[48] Vogt. Zbl. f. Gyn. № 3, S. 130, 1925.

[49] Wi11. D. med. Woch. № 6, S. 222, 1929.

[50] Zawodzinski. Rev. fr. de gyn. et d’obst. № 4, H. 284,1930.

[51] Zimmermann und Nahmmacher. Fort. Rö. Str. Bd. 36, H. 3, S. 572, 1927,

[52] Schnitz. Surg., gyn. and. obst., V. 48, № 1, P. 63, 1929

[53] Schneider und Eisler. Zbl. f. d. ges. Med. № 1, S. 23, 1927.

[54] Schneider und Eisler. Fort Rö. Str. Bd. 35, H. 5, S. 1007, 1927.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector