General non-specific reactivity of an organism as a factor of individualization of de-mands, behavior and social activity of individual

Alexander B. Mulik , Irina V. Ulesikova , Irina G. Mulik , Sergey V. Bulatetsky , Yulia A. Shatyr

I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2) : 227 -236.

PDF (985KB)
I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2) :227 -236. DOI: 10.23888/PAVLOVJ2019272227-236
Original study
research-article

General non-specific reactivity of an organism as a factor of individualization of de-mands, behavior and social activity of individual

Author information +
History +
PDF (985KB)

Abstract

Behavioral and social activity, being a component of the general human activity, depends on a number of individual combinations of genotype and phenotype, as well as on environmental conditions. With sufficient elaboration of the general aspects of the physiological mechanisms, systemic organization of the behavioral and social activity of an individual remains an open question of the objective conditionality of the expression and orientation of social activity by individual combination of actualized demands and the psycho-physiological preconditions for their formation.

Aim. To identify regularities of physiological individualization of formation of demands, of behavioral and social human activity.

Materials and Methods. The research was carried out with the participation of 78 men and women aged 18-22 years, students of the Crimean Federal University.

Results. As a result of a complex of experimental studies, the systemic organization of functional, psychophysiological, psychological and social mechanisms of the individual organization of behavioral and social activity of an individual was confirmed. It is determined that anxiety, neuropsychological reactivity, extraversion and neuroticism, as the main preсonditions for behavioral and social activity, are most pronounced in individuals characterized by a high level of general nonspecific reactivity of an organism. The role of the functional and psychophysiological status of the organism in the individualization of demands is substantiated. At the same time, the minimal intensity of actualization of basic demands is characteristic of individuals with a low level of general nonspecific reactivity of an organism. Connections between individual vectors of social activity and basic human demands are specified. The most significant, universal impact on various types of social activity is produced by safety demands, which are the basic human biological demands. The demands for self-realization determine behavioral, social, professional and economic activity of a person. Social and cognitive demands positively affect behavioral and social activity. An insignificant negative relationship is revealed between reproductive demands and social destructiveness.

Conclusion. The cumulative registration of physiological and psychological characteristics provides an opportunity to predict the extent and subject orientation of the individual social activity.

Keywords

functional status / psychophysiological status / general nonspecific reactivity of an organism / demands / behavioral activity / social activity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Alexander B. Mulik, Irina V. Ulesikova, Irina G. Mulik, Sergey V. Bulatetsky, Yulia A. Shatyr. General non-specific reactivity of an organism as a factor of individualization of de-mands, behavior and social activity of individual. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald, 2019, 27(2): 227-236 DOI:10.23888/PAVLOVJ2019272227-236

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bukhanovskiy AO, Andreyev AS. Strukturno-dinamicheskaya iyerarkhiya pola cheloveka. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks; 1993. (In Russ).

[2]

Бухановский А.О., Андреев А.С. Структурно-динамическая иерархия пола человека. Ростов н/Д.: Феникс; 1993.

[3]

Myers DG. Social Psychology. 7th ed. Saint-Petersburg: Prime-Euroznak; 2002. (In Russ).

[4]

Майерс Д. Социальная психология. 7-е изд. – СПб.: Прайм-Еврознак; 2002.

[5]

Il’in EP. Differentsial’naya psikhologiya muzhchiny i zhenshchiny. Saint-Petersburg: Peter; 2003. (In Russ).

[6]

Ильин Е.П. Дифференциальная психология мужчины и женщины. – СПб.: Питер; 2003.

[7]

Maddan S, Walker JT, Miller JM. Does size really matter? A reexamination of Sheldon,s somatotipes and criminal behavior. The Social Science Journal. 2008;45(2):330-44. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2008.03.009

[8]

Maddan S., Walker J.T., Miller J.M. Does size really matter? A reexamination of Sheldon,s somatotipes and criminal behavior // The Social Science Journal. 2008. Vol. 45, №2. P. 330-344. doi:10.1016/j.soscij. 2008.03.009

[9]

Saklofske D, Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG, et al. Extraversion-Introversion. In: Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. 2012. P. 150-159. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00164-6

[10]

Saklofske D., Eysenck H.J., Eysenck S.B.G., et al. Extraversion-Introversion. In: Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. 2012. P. 150-159. doi:10.1016/B978 -0-12-375000-6.00164-6

[11]

Bayevskiy RM. Prognozirovaniye sostoyaniy na grani normy i patologii. Moscow: Meditsina; 1979. (In Russ).

[12]

Баевский Р.М. Прогнозирование состояний на грани нормы и патологии. М.: Медицина; 1979.

[13]

Pavlov IP. Dvadtsatiletniy opyt ob'yektivnogo izu-cheniya vysshey deyatel’nosti (povedeniya) zhi-votnykh. Moscow: Nauka; 1973. (In Russ).

[14]

Павлов И.П. Двадцатилетний опыт объективного изучения высшей деятельности (поведения) животных. М.: Наука; 1973.

[15]

Egorova MS. Psikhologiya individual’nykh razlichiy. Moscow: Planeta detey; 1997. (In Russ).

[16]

Егорова М.С. Психология индивидуальных различий. М.: Планета детей; 1997.

[17]

Bernshneyn NA. Fiziologiya dvizheniy i aktivnost’. Moscow: Nauka; 1990. (In Russ).

[18]

Берншнейн Н.А. Физиология движений и активность. М.: Наука; 1990.

[19]

Zhukov DA. Biologiya povedeniya: gumoral’nyye mekhanizmy. Saint-Petersburg: Rech’; 2007. (In Russ).

[20]

Жуков Д.А. Биология поведения: гуморальные механизмы. СПб.: Речь; 2007.

[21]

Ravich-Shcherbo IV, Matyurina TM, Grigorenko EL. Psikhogenetika. Moscow: Aspekt Press; 2000. (In Russ).

[22]

Равич-Щербо И.В., Матюрина Т.М., Григоренко Е.Л. Психогенетика. М.: Аспект Пресс; 2000.

[23]

Mulik AB, Postnova MV, Mulik YA, et al. Ellaboration and efficative analysis of the qualitative and quantitative estimation of the human requirements. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2010;(4):52-61. (In Russ).

[24]

Мулик А.Б., Постнова М.В., Мулик Ю.А., и др. Разработка и определение эффективности метода качественной и количественной оценки потребностей человека // Российский медико-биологический вестник имени академика И.П. Павлова. 2010. №4. С. 52-61.

[25]

Mulik A, Novochadov V, Bondarev A, et al. New insights into genotype-phenotype correlation in individuals with different level of general non-specific reactivity of an organism. Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics. 2016;13(4). doi:10.2390/ biecoll-jib-2016-95

[26]

Mulik A., Novochadov V., Bondarev A., et al. New insights into genotype-phenotype correlation in individuals with different level of general non-specific reactivity of an organism // Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics. 2016. Vol. 13, №4. doi:10. 2390/biecoll-jib-2016-95

[27]

Mulik AB, Postnova MV, Mulik YuA. Uroven’ obshchey nespetsificheskoy reaktivnosti organizma cheloveka. Volgograd: Volgogradskoye nauchnoye izdatel’stvo; 2009. (In Russ).

[28]

Мулик А.Б., Постнова М.В., Мулик Ю.А. Уровень общей неспецифической реактивности организма человека. Волгоград: Волгоградское научное издательство; 2009.

[29]

Kharlanova EM. Razvitiye sotsial’noy aktivnosti budushchikh spetsialistov: psikhologo-pedagogi-cheskiy aspekt. Chelyabinsk: CHGPU; 2009. (In Russ).

[30]

Харланова Е.М. Развитие социальной активности будущих специалистов: психолого-педаго-гический аспект. Челябинск: ЧГПУ; 2009.

[31]

Delaryu VV, Tambiyeva FA. Metodiki izucheniya lichnosti. Kislovodsk: RGU; 1998. (In Russ).

[32]

Деларю В.В., Тамбиева Ф.А. Методики изучения личности. Кисловодск: РГУ; 1998.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Mulik A.B., Ulesikova I.V., Mulik I.G., Bulatetsky S.V., Shatyr Y.A.

PDF (985KB)

64

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/