Comparative efficiency of suturing of defect of kidney after resection with a mesh implant on pigs models

Abstract

Aim. Improvement of the quality of the kidney resection.

Materials and Methods. A total of 50 laparoscopic kidney resections were performed on pig models. In 25 cases, resection was carried out according to the standard method of hemostasis of the kidney resection bed using U-shaped hemostatic sutures vicryl 3-0. In 25 cases, the kidney resection bed was sutured according to the author's method of hemostasis of the kidney resection bed using a polypropylene mesh.

Results. The mean operative time was comparable in the comparison groups, intraoperative blood loss was 30% lower in the group of pig models operated on with a prolene implant. The mean weight ratio of the resected kidney to the contralateral kidney was 77.3% after the classic resection of kidney and 85.6% after the resection with use of a prolene implant.

Conclusion. Laparoscopic kidney resection using a mesh implant is a highly efficient method of kidney resection, providing high-quality hemostasis with less traumatization of healthy renal parenchyma. The proposed method is recommended for further study.

Keywords

kidney tumor / kidney resection / polypropylene implant

References

[1] Ferlay F, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Annals of Oncology. 2007;18(3):581-92. doi:10. 1093/annonc/mdl498

[2] Ferlay F., Autier P., Boniol M., et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006 // Annals of Oncology. 2007. Vol. 18, №3. P. 581-592. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl498

[3] Keane Th, Gillatt D, Evans ChP, et al. Current and Future Trends in Treatment of Renal Cancer. European Urology. 2007;6(3):374-84. doi:10.1016/ j.eursup.2006.12.006

[4] Keane Th., Gillatt D., Evans Ch.P., et al. Current and Future Trends in Treatment of Renal Cancer // European Urology. 2007. Vol. 6, №3. P. 374-384. doi:10.1016/j.eursup.2006.12.006

[5] Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2005;55(2):74-108. doi:10. 3322/canjclin.55.2.74

[6] Parkin D.M., Bray F., Ferlay J., et al. Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 // CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2005. Vol. 55, №2. P. 74-108. doi:10. 3322/canjclin.55.2.74

[7] Alekseev BYa, Anzhiganova YuV, Lykov AV, et al. Some specific features of the diagnosis and treatment of kidney cancer in Russia: preliminary results of a multicenter cooperative study. Cancer Urology. 2012;(3):24-30. (In Russ).

[8] Алексеев Б.Я., Анжиганова Ю.В., Лыков А.В., и др. Особенности диагностики и лечения рака почки в России: предварительные результаты многоцентрового кооперированного исследо-вания // Онкоурология. 2012. №3. С. 24-30.

[9] Chissov VI, Starinskiy VV, Petrova GV, editors. Zlokachestvennyye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2010 godu (zabolevayemost’ i smertnost’). Mos-cow; 2011. (In Russ).

[10] Чиссов В.И., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В., ред. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2010 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.; 2011.

[11] Gulov MK, Abdulloev SM, Rofiev KhK. Quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2018; 26(4):493-9. (In Russ). doi:10.23888/PAVLOVJ 2018264493-499

[12] Гулов М.К., Абдуллоев С.М., Рофиев Х.К. Качество жизни пациентов, страдающих хронической болезнью почек // Российский медико-био-логический вестник имени акаде-мика И.П. Павлова. 2018. Т. 26, №4. С. 493-499. doi:10.23888 /PAVLOVJ2018264493-499

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Filimonov V.B., Vasin R.V., Sobennikov I.S., Petryaev A.V.