Mud therapy in the rehabilitation of patients with cervical dorsopathy

Elena V. Filatova , Khajimurat M. Malayev , Oleg E. Konovalov

I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 280 -287.

PDF (455KB)
I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) :280 -287. DOI: 10.23888/PAVLOVJ2018262280-287
Original study
research-article

Mud therapy in the rehabilitation of patients with cervical dorsopathy

Author information +
History +
PDF (455KB)

Abstract

Aim. To identify specificity of reaction of a male and female organism to galvanic mud application procedures in cervicalgia.

Materials and Methods. 48 Patients (23 men and 25 women) with the diagnosis of cervicalgia who took a course of rehabilitation treatment in Republican Hospital of Rehabilitation Treatment of Makhachkala, were examined. The patients received medicinal treatment and medical massage. Galvanic mud therapy was conducted with the underlying standard therapy. The effectiveness and safety of the procedure were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS), and also parameters of the arterial pressure and heart rate before and after the procedure, and also values of Kerdo vegetative index, body mass index, mobility of the cervical part of the spine, psychoemotional condition by WAM test.

Results. Analysis of predomination and characteristics of pain syndrome revealed predomination of the damage to the upper cervical parts (in women – 62.0%, in men – 40.0%), and statistically more common cervicocranialgias in women (22.0% against 8.0% in men). Headaches associated with pain in the neck were reliably more common in women than in men (48.0% and 10.0%, respectively). A significant difference in the rate of complaints of pain irradiation to the upper limbs was recorded (20.0% of women against 10.0% of men). Intensity of pain syndrome determined by VAS test significantly differed in the compared groups before rehabilitation (5.25±1.64 points in men and 5.62±1.98 points in women, р<0.05); after rehabilitation treatment VAS parameters decreased in both groups: in men down to 1.62±0.83 points (р<0.05), in women – to 2.25±1.07 points (р<0.05), here, no significant differences between the groups were found. In women with cervicalgias the distance between the upper and lower cervical vertebrae was on average 14.0±0.1 cm, increment on bending before treatment was 2.43±0.75 cm and after treatment 2.75±0.11 cm which indicates a tendency to normalization of the condition of muscle tissue, but preservation of spastic component.

Conclusion. Mud therapy in complex rehabilitation of patients positively influences recovery of the motor activity of the cervical part of the spine.

Keywords

rehabilitation / cervicalgia / mud

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Elena V. Filatova, Khajimurat M. Malayev, Oleg E. Konovalov. Mud therapy in the rehabilitation of patients with cervical dorsopathy. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald, 2018, 26(2): 280-287 DOI:10.23888/PAVLOVJ2018262280-287

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Barinov AN, Parkhomenko EV. Tservikogennaya golovnaya bol' – differentsial'naya diagnostika i lechenie. Nevrologiya, neyropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika. 2012;3:248. (In Russ).

[2]

Баринов А.Н., Пархоменко Е.В. Цервикогенная головная боль – дифференциальная диагностика и лечение // Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика. 2012. №3. С. 2428.

[3]

Akrakulova YuV, Vladimirskiy EV, Mullayanova EA. Potentsirovanie effekta bal'neogryazelecheniya pri nespetsificheskikh bolyakh v nizhney chasti spiny. Voprosy kurortologii i lechebnoy fizicheskoy kul'tury. 2014;6:349. (In Russ).

[4]

Акракулова Ю.В., Владимирский Е.В., Муллаянова Е.А. Потенцирование эффекта бальнеогрязелечения при неспецифических болях в нижней части спины // Вопросы курортологии и лечебной физической культуры. 2014. №6. С. 3439.

[5]

Kasatkin DS. Nespetsificheskie boli v shee: taktika vedeniya patsienta. Consilium medicum. 2012;14(2):6570. (In Russ).

[6]

Касаткин Д.С. Неспецифические боли в шее: тактика ведения пациента // Consilium medicum. 2012. Т. 14, №2. С. 6570.

[7]

Vosnesenskaya TG. Boli v spine i konechnostyakh. In: Golubeva LV, editor. Bolevye sindromy v nevrologicheskoy praktike. Moscow: MEDpressinform; 2010. P. 20249. (In Russ).

[8]

Вознесенская Т.Г. Боли в спине и конечностях. В кн.: Голубева В.Л., ред. Болевые синдромы в неврологической практике. М.: МЕДпрессинформ, 2010. С. 202249.

[9]

Surskaya DS. Sovremennye aspekty lecheniya dorsopatii. Nevrologiya i psikhiatriya. 2009; 17(20):13114. (In Russ).

[10]

Сурская Е.В. Современные аспекты лечения дорсопатии // Неврология и психиатрия. 2009. Т. 17, №20. С. 13111314.

[11]

Yahno NN. Bol': rukovodstvo dlya vrachey i studentov. Moscow: MEDpress; 2009. (In Russ).

[12]

Яхно Н.Н., ред. Боль: руководство для врачей и студентов. М.: МЕДпрессинформ, 2009.

[13]

Gurlenya AM, Bagel' GE, Smychek VB. Fizioterapiya v nevrologii. Moscow: Medical literature; 2005. (In Russ).

[14]

Гурленя А.М., Багель Г.Е., Смычек В.Б. Физиотерапия в неврологии. М.: Медицинская литература; 2005.

[15]

Bogolyubov VM. Fizioterapiya i kurortologiya. Moscow: Binom; 2012. (In Russ).

[16]

Боголюбов В.М., ред. Физиотерапия и курортология. М.: Бином, 2012.

[17]

Olefirenko VT. Vodoteplolechenie. 2e ed. Moscow: Medicina; 1978. (In Russ).

[18]

Олефиренко. В.Т. Водотеплолечение. 2е изд. М.: Медицина, 1978.

[19]

Mel'nichuk PV, editor. Bolezni nervnoj sistemy. Moscow: Medicina; 1982. (In Russ).

[20]

Мельничук П.В., ред. Болезни нервной системы. М.: Медицина, 1982.

[21]

Golubev VL. Nevrologicheskie sindromy. Moscow: Jejdos Media; 2002. (In Russ)

[22]

Голубев В.Л. Неврологические синдромы. М.: Эйдос Медиа, 2002.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Filatova E.V., Malayev K.M., Konovalov O.E.

PDF (455KB)

92

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/