Please wait a minute...

Landscape Architecture Frontiers

Landsc. Archit. Front.    2017, Vol. 5 Issue (3) : 52-59
Views & Criticisms |
Sharing City Seoul: Solving social and urban issues through sharing
Creative Commons Korea
A community that spreads the values of sharing and openness
Download: PDF(3632 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Sharing City Seoul, a plan to revive the sharing culture on a city level to solve the social and economic problems, was proclaimed by the Seoul Metropolitan Government in September 2012. Confronted with a variety of social and urban issues around economic slowdown, welfare decrease, environmental pollution, social isolation and diminishing community spirit, the city leaders of Seoul introduced the plan to reduce pressures in these areas without putting additional resources in, by establishing a sharing ecosystem and embracing it as an integral part of Seoul’s economy. Seoul’s case is unique as the sharing policies were led by the city government as a city policy rather than the private sector, based on a creative, public-private partnership model. The city has taken initiatives to lead by example by building the foundation for the sharing city project to take root and spreading policies through collaboration with citizens and district level governments as partners.

This paper is a derivative of Seoul Draws a City through Sharing under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. By elaborating on the city’s strategies that have enabled Sharing City Seoul to make progress, including improving laws and institutions, supporting sharing enterprises, and facilitating citizen participation, this paper explores visions and insights for a more sharing and sustainable urban future.

Keywords Sharing City      Seoul      Policy      Guideline      Public-Private Partnership     
Issue Date: 25 July 2017
 Cite this article:   
Creative Commons Korea. Sharing City Seoul: Solving social and urban issues through sharing[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(3): 52-59.
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Creative Commons Korea
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Mariana VALVERDE, Alexandra FLNN. “MORE BUZZWORDS THAN ANSWERS” — TO SIDEWALK LABS IN TORONTO[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(2): 115-123.
[2] Dajian ZHU, Yishuang SHE. From possession to use — An Interview with Dajian Zhu on sharing economy and sharing city[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(3): 32-39.
[3] Jian HU,Dihua LI. Dialogue with the Local Government: Zhenjiang’s Sponge City[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2015, 3(2): 32-39.
[4] Xianming TU,Tina TIAN. Six Questions towards a Sponge City — Report on Power of Public POLICY: Sponge City and the Trend of Landscape Architecture[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2015, 3(2): 22-31.
[5] James HITCHMOUGH, Ye HANG. The Role of Ecologically Based Vegetation in Urban Infrastructure — A New Opportunity for the Nursery and Seed Industry in China[J]. Landsc Archit Front, 2013, 1(3): 46-59.
Full text