Please wait a minute...

Landscape Architecture Frontiers

Landsc. Archit. Front.    2019, Vol. 7 Issue (5) : 24-37     https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-1-020010
Papers
THE SPARK OF CONTEMPORARY LANDSCAPE CREATIVITY — THE FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE DESIGN STUDIO IN THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
Vincci MAK()
Senior Lecturer and Program Director of Bachelor of Arts in Landscape Studies, at the Division of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, the University of Hong Kong
Download: PDF(20036 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Traditional landscape design studio training starts with the learning of a classic or prominent landscape project, may it be through site observation or a trace-over / imitation exercise. Foundation year students in a landscape program typically take the landscape precedent project as a study ground, to learn about the landscape master’s design through the mimicking process in the trace-over exercise, or to learn about the articulation of spatial design through site observation.

Landscape Architecture, afterall, is a creative endeavor. Thus, an alternative approach is to start the fundamental training with the study of artistic processes, to foster appreciation in art and design, innovative concept development, and articulation in craftsmanship. Also, the contemporary discourse of Landscape Architecture is no longer simply about spatial design, but has transformed to require understanding of process, operation, step-by-step mechanism, movement, and how a system works. The performative and dynamic aspects of landscape are being valued nowadays.

Such ways of seeing landscapes require a different set of observation and representation methods and skills. In this article, the author shares how the pedagogical content and developments of the foundation year landscape design studio in the HKU Bachelor of Arts in Landscape Studies BA(LS) Program help train students with such new interpretations to contemporary Landscape Architecture.

Keywords Foundation Landscape Design Studio      Dynamic      Process      Creativity      Art      Concept      Observation and Representation     
Corresponding Author(s): Vincci MAK   
Issue Date: 10 December 2019
 Cite this article:   
Vincci MAK. THE SPARK OF CONTEMPORARY LANDSCAPE CREATIVITY — THE FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE DESIGN STUDIO IN THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(5): 24-37.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/10.15302/J-LAF-1-020010
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/Y2019/V7/I5/24
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Vincci MAK
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Huaichun XU, Junyi LIN, Jun ZHU, Anzhuo CHEN. THE OVERALL IMPROVEMENT OF URBAN GOVERNANCE IN PUBLIC REALM DRIVEN BY MICRO REGENERATION ACTIONS: MASTER PLANNING OF THE OVERALL IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE FOR TIANHE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, GUANGZHOU[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(5): 130-147.
[2] Christopher KELLY, Liam MOURITZ. THE ACCELERATED SMART(-IFICATION) OF CITIES POST-COVID-19[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(5): 180-187.
[3] LYU Wanyue, GUO Wei, FANG Binxi, ZHANG Yijia. URBAN REGENERATION WITH COMMUNITY BUILDING: DASHILANR MICROREGENERATION HANDBOOK[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(5): 166-179.
[4] Qunhui ZHAO, Kai ZHOU. RESEARCH ON THE COMMUNITY CO-PRODUCTION PRACTICES: A CASE STUDY OF LONDON AND CHANGSHA[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(5): 46-59.
[5] Kongjian YU. ON THE “TRIO” OF BEAUTIFUL CITIES[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(5): 4-11.
[6] Anna KORNEEVA, Irmak TURANLI. EARTH CHOREOGRAPHER: REMEDIATING OBSOLETE GROUNDS OF THE FUTURE[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(4): 164-173.
[7] Helena H. RONG, Juncheng YANG, William Jingwei QIAN. ENABLING PARTICIPATORY ACTIONS IN COMMUNITY DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT: A COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENT DIGITAL PLATFORM IN ANG SILA, THAILAND[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(4): 126-139.
[8] Ulrika K. STIGSDOTTER, Ulrik SIDENIUS. KEEPING PROMISES—HOW TO ATTAIN THE GOAL OF DESIGNING HEALTH-SUPPORTING URBAN GREEN SPACE[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(3): 78-89.
[9] Yiwei HUANG. RESPONSIBILITIES AND ROLES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CHILD FRIENDLY CITY[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(2): 110-121.
[10] Wenjie PENG. CHILD’S INFRASTRUCTURE IN CITIES — URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN TO GUARANTEE CHILD RIGHTS[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(2): 100-109.
[11] Shanni PENG, Chen ZHOU, Yaxin ZHOU. THE ESTABLISHMENT AND ANALYSES OF THE SOCIAL NETWORK OF PARTICIPANTS IN CHILD-FRIENDLY COMMUNITY BUILDING — A CASE OF THE KIDS’ GARDENS IN YUCAI NO. 3 PRIMARY SCHOOL IN CHANGSHA, HUNAN PROVINCE[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(2): 36-51.
[12] Xuelu CHEN, Jue LI, Liyan XU. ECOLOGICAL EXTENSION OF REGULATORY PLANNING IN CHINA’S TERRITORIAL SPATIALPLANNING SYSTEM: A CASE STUDY ON MENTOUGOU DISTRICT, BEIJING[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(1): 42-55.
[13] Kongjian YU. THE WONDERLAND AT THE FOOT OF MOUNT QISHAN[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(5): 4-9.
[14] Valerio MORABITO. VERBAL DRAWINGS: MAPPING LANDSCAPE IDEAS[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(5): 38-57.
[15] Dong ZHANG. PARTICIPATION, INTERPRETATION, AND REPRESENTATION OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(5): 90-97.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed