Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2011, Vol. 6 Issue (1) : 100-113
Semantic Criticism: The “Westernization” of the Concepts in Ancient Chinese Philosophy—A Discussion of Yan Fu’s Theory of Qi
ZENG Zhenyu()
Advanced Institute for Confucian Studies, Shandong University, Ji’nan 250100, China
Download: PDF(610 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Every philosophical mode has a unique conceptual system. “Qi” has consistently been a fundamental part of ancient Chinese philosophy, and its significance is obvious. Guided by the idea of “re-evaluating all values,” Yan Fu, who was deeply influenced by Western philosophy and logic, used “reverse analogical interpretation” to present a new explanation of the traditional Chinese concept of qi. Qi thus evolved into basic physical particles. Yan’s philosophical effort has great significance: The logical ambiguity that had haunted qi was overcome. However, qi gradually evolved into a particular existence as it was “Westernized.” It completely lost its internal “flavor” as indigenous Chinese philosophy. Its previous philosophical abstraction and universality diminished and at the same time it was not “Westernized” into the “pure concept” of Hegel’s philosophy.”

Keywords Qi      ontological source      Yan Fu      reverse analogical interpretation      Westernization 1     
Corresponding Author(s): ZENG Zhenyu,   
Issue Date: 05 March 2011
 Cite this article:   
ZENG Zhenyu. Semantic Criticism: The “Westernization” of the Concepts in Ancient Chinese Philosophy—A Discussion of Yan Fu’s Theory of Qi[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 100-113.
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
ZENG Zhenyu
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Callisto Searle. The Deaths of One Conceptual Metaphor in Two Languages[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(2): 322-341.
[2] GAO Shan. Xujing (Emptiness and Stillness) in Daoism, Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature, and Environmental Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(2): 224-236.
[3] Thomas Michael, CHEN Yazhou. Approaching Laozi : Comparing a Syncretic Reading to a Synthetic One[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 10-25.
[4] CHEN Guying. The Tradition of Emotive Writing in the Zhuangzi and Its Echoes in Later Generations[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 340-352.
[5] GUO Yi. The Origin and Differentiation of the Theories of Human Nature in Pre-Qin China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 212-238.
[6] Shirley Chan,Daniel Lee. Shendu and Qingdu: Reading the Recovered Bamboo and Silk Manuscripts[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 4-20.
[7] James Garrison. On Cheng Chung-Ying’s Bentiyong Onto-hermeneutics[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 471-480.
[8] DING Ji. The Manifestation Range of Innately Good Knowledge and Ability, and the Danger of Separation: On Zhuzi’s Question about Understanding Words[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 217-243.
[9] LI Chunying. Between Virtues and Blessings: A Discussion on Zhang Jiucheng’s Thoughts[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 191-216.
[10] GAO Shan. Can the West Save the East? Intrinsic Value and the Foundation of Chinese Environmental Ethics[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 112-127.
[11] LI Youguang , . The True or the Artificial: Theories on Human Nature before Mencius and Xunzi—Based on “Sheng is from Ming, and Ming is from Tian”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(1): 31-50.
[12] CHEN Lai. “Ru”: Xunzi’s thoughts on Ru and its significance[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(2): 157-179.
[13] QIANG Yu. The Philosophies of Laozi and Zhuangzi and the Bamboo-slip Essay Hengxian[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 88-115.
[14] ZHANG Qian. The boundaries of beauty in Pre-Qin Confucian aesthetics[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 52-63.
[15] LÜ Yaohuai. The tradition of the virtue of qian and its contemporary fate[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(4): 558-576.
Full text