Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2010, Vol. 5 Issue (1) : 134-141     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-010-0007-4
Research articles
Some Remarks on the Re-building of the Category of Essence and the Reflective Modernity
HAN Zhen ,
Research Center for Value and Culture, College of Philosophy and Sociology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
Download: PDF(372 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract If modernity is manifested as essentialism, postmodernity is manifested as anti-essentialism. Modernity is, in essence, human beings’ discovery of their own power, and is based on rational knowledge that has grasped the essence of things. In fact, in the discourse system of modernity, the various concepts of “essence” connote nothing but people’s imaginative constructions and rational conjectures about objects. In the past, our order, be it internal or external, was in essence guaranteed by God. Afterwards, all “essences”, as essences, must rationally prove the reason for their existence. In the postmodern context and discourse system, God, and also the “human being” who has created essence, has “died”. We should not simply resume the belief in traditional essence, but should reconstruct, on the basis of a full understanding of the intellectual meaning of postmodernity’s challenges, some historicity, practicality, and the concept of essence that accords with the historical as well as communicative rationality. We must realize that the essence of things is the essence of particular things in a particular stage of development, internally containing infinite differences and variety. Only things with postmodern traits contain modernity, and only the concept of essence that conceives difference accords with time.
Keywords essence      modernity      postmodernism      eflection      
Issue Date: 05 March 2010
 Cite this article:   
HAN Zhen. Some Remarks on the Re-building of the Category of Essence and the Reflective Modernity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(1): 134-141.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-010-0007-4
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2010/V5/I1/134
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HAN Zhen
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] DONG Lihe, JIN Qianwen. The Study of Western Postmodern Philosophy of History in China in the Four Decades of Reform and Opening Up[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(2): 254-264.
[2] TONG Li. Modernity and Postmodernity: The Characteristics of Postmodern Cultural Media[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(2): 265-277.
[3] HE Chaoan. What Is Not So Fine with Fine’s Critique of the Modal Account of Essence[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 250-262.
[4] NI Liangkang. Edmund Husserl’s Political Praxis and Theoretical Reflections during World War I[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 241-253.
[5] Gerard Walmsley. Is There a Place for Traditional Values and Virtues in Society Today?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 31-52.
[6] ZHANG Lifeng. Comments on Plantinga’s Argument of Transworld Identity[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 164-178.
[7] Jos de MUL. Horizons of Hermeneutics: Intercultural Hermeneutics in a Globalizing World[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(4): 628-655.
[8] WANG Zhongjiang. Ultimate Concern, Reflection of Civilization, and the Idea of “Man” in Yin Haiguang[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(4): 565-584.
[9] ZHANG Shiying. The double meanings of “essence”: The natural and humane sciences — A tentative linkage of Hegel, Dilthey, and Husserl[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 143-155.
[10] YAO Dazhi. Postmodernist liberalism: A critique of Richard Rorty’s political philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(3): 455-463.
[11] DUAN Dezhi. Aquinas’ transcendences to Aristotle in the doctrine of essence[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(4): 572-582.
[12] Feng Ziyi. A contemporary interpretation of Marx’s thoughts on modernity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(2): 254-268.
[13] Yang Geng, Zhang Qixue. The essence, characteristics and limitation of post-colonialism: from Karl Marx’s point of view[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(2): 279-294.
[14] Yi Junqing. Dimensions of Modernity and Their Contemporary Fate[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 6-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed