Automatic sub-pixel coastline extraction based on spectral mixture analysis using EO-1 Hyperion data

Zhonghua HONG, Xuesu LI, Yanling HAN, Yun ZHANG, Jing WANG, Ruyan ZHOU, Kening HU

PDF(3426 KB)
PDF(3426 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 478-494. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-018-0702-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Automatic sub-pixel coastline extraction based on spectral mixture analysis using EO-1 Hyperion data

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Many megacities (such as Shanghai) are located in coastal areas, therefore, coastline monitoring is critical for urban security and urban development sustainability. A shoreline is defined as the intersection between coastal land and a water surface and features seawater edge movements as tides rise and fall. Remote sensing techniques have increasingly been used for coastline extraction; however, traditional hard classification methods are performed only at the pixel-level and extracting sub-pixel accuracy using soft classification methods is both challenging and time consuming due to the complex features in coastal regions. This paper presents an automatic sub-pixel coastline extraction method (ASPCE) from high-spectral satellite imaging that performs coastline extraction based on spectral mixture analysis and, thus, achieves higher accuracy. The ASPCE method consists of three main components: 1) A Water-Vegetation-Impervious-Soil (W-V-I-S) model is first presented to detect mixed W-V-I-S pixels and determine the endmember spectra in coastal regions; 2) The linear spectral mixture unmixing technique based on Fully Constrained Least Squares (FCLS) is applied to the mixed W-V-I-S pixels to estimate seawater abundance; and 3) The spatial attraction model is used to extract the coastline. We tested this new method using EO-1 images from three coastal regions in China: the South China Sea, the East China Sea, and the Bohai Sea. The results showed that the method is accurate and robust. Root mean square error (RMSE) was utilized to evaluate the accuracy by calculating the distance differences between the extracted coastline and the digitized coastline. The classifier’s performance was compared with that of the Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis (MESMA), Mixture Tuned Matched Filtering (MTMF), Sequential Maximum Angle Convex Cone (SMACC), Constrained Energy Minimization (CEM), and one classical Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI). The results from the three test sites indicated that the proposed ASPCE method extracted coastlines more efficiently than did the compared methods, and its coastline extraction accuracy corresponded closely to the digitized coastline, with 0.39 pixels, 0.40 pixels, and 0.35 pixels in the three test regions, showing that the ASPCE method achieves an accuracy below 12.0 m (0.40 pixels). Moreover, in the quantitative accuracy assessment for the three test sites, the ASPCE method shows the best performance in coastline extraction, achieving a 0.35 pixel-level at the Bohai Sea, China test site. Therefore, the proposed ASPCE method can extract coastline more accurately than can the hard classification methods or other spectral unmixing methods.

Keywords

coastline / fully constrained least squares / spatial attraction algorithm / urban development / EO-1 data

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhonghua HONG, Xuesu LI, Yanling HAN, Yun ZHANG, Jing WANG, Ruyan ZHOU, Kening HU. Automatic sub-pixel coastline extraction based on spectral mixture analysis using EO-1 Hyperion data. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 478‒494 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0702-5

References

[1]
Alonzo M, Bookhagen B, Roberts D A (2014). Urban tree species mapping using hyperspectral and lidar data fusion. Remote Sens Environ, 148(148): 70–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Atkinson P M (1997). Mapping Sub-Pixel Boundaries from Remotely Sensed Images. In: Kemp Z, ed. Innovations in GIS 4. London: Taylor and Francis: 166–180
[3]
Barry P (2001). EO-1 Hyperion Science Data User’s Guide, Level 1_B.TRW Space. Defense and Information Systems, 555–557
[4]
Bird E C F (1985). Coastline Changes. A global review. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.,108
[5]
Boak E H, Turner I L (2005). Shoreline definition and detection: a review. J Coast Res, 21(4): 688–703
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Bouchahma M, Yan W (2014). Monitoring shoreline change on Djerba Island using GIS and multi-temporal satellite data. Arab J Geosci, 7(9): 3705–3713
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Delhez E J M, Barth A (2011). Science based management of coastal waters. J Mar Syst, 88(1): 1–2
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Di K, Wang J, Ma R, Li R (2003). Automatic shoreline extraction from high resolution IKONOS satellite imagery. Cortex, 49(1): 184–199
[9]
Feng Y, Liu Y, Liu D (2015). Shoreline mapping with cellular automata and the shoreline progradation analysis in Shanghai, China from 1979 to 2008. Arab J Geosci, 8(7): 4337–4351
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Feyisa G L, Meilby H, Fensholt R, Proud S R (2014). Automated water extraction index: a new technique for surface water mapping using Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 140(1): 23–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Foody G M (1996). Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data. Int J Remote Sens, 17(7): 1317–1340
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Foody G M, Muslim A M, Atkinson P M (2003). Super-resolution Mapping of the Shoreline through Soft Classification Analyses. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, (6): 3429–3431
[13]
Franke J, Roberts D A, Halligan K, Menz G (2009). Hierarchical multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (MESMA) of hyperspectral imagery for urban environments. Remote Sens Environ, 113(8): 1712–1723
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Frazier P S, Page K J (2000). Water body detection and delineation with Landsat TM data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 66(12): 1461–1468
[15]
Gens R (2010). Remote sensing of coastlines: detection, extraction and monitoring. Int J Remote Sens, 31(7): 1819–1836
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Güneralp İ, Filippi A M, Hales B U (2013). River-flow boundary delineation from digital aerial photography and ancillary images using Support Vector Machines. GIsci Remote Sens, 50(1): 1–25
[17]
Harris A T (2006). Spectral mapping tools from the earth sciences applied to spectral microscopy data. Cytometry A, 69A(8): 872–879
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Keshava N, Mustard J F (2002). Spectral unmixing. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 19(1): 44–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Lee J S, Jurkevich I (1990). Coastline detection and tracing In SAR images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 28(4): 662–668
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Li R, Di K, Ma R (2003). 3-D shoreline extraction from IKONOS satellite imagery. Mar Geod, 26(1–2): 107–115
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Li R, Keong C W, Ramcharan E, Kjerfve E, Willis D (1998). A coastal GIS for shoreline monitoring and management-case study in Malaysia. Surveying and Land Information Systems, 58(3): 157–166
[22]
Li W, Gong P (2016). Continuous monitoring of coastline dynamics in western Florida with a 30-year time series of Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 179: 196–209
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Liu H, Jezek K C (2004). Automated extraction of coastline from satellite imagery by integrating Canny edge detection and locally adaptive thresholding methods. Int J Remote Sens, 25(5): 937–958
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Ma B, Wu L, Zhang X, Li X, Liu Y, Wang S (2014). Locally adaptive unmixing method for lake-water area extraction based on MODIS 250 m bands. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 33(1): 109–118
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
McFeeters S K (1996). The use of the normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens, 17(7): 1425–1432
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Mertens K C, De Baets B, Verbeke L P C, De Wulf R R (2006). A sub-pixel mapping algorithm based on sub-pixel/pixel spatial attraction models. Int J Remote Sens, 27(15): 3293–3310
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Mujabar P S, Chandrasekar N (2013). Shoreline change analysis along the coast between Kanyakumari and Tuticorin of India using remote sensing and GIS. Arab J Geosci, 6(3): 647–664
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Murray N J, Clemens R S, Phinn S R, Possingham H P, Fuller R A (2014). Tracking the rapid loss of tidal wetlands in the Yellow Sea. Front Ecol Environ, 12(5): 267–272
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Nunziata F, Migliaccio M, Li X, Ding X (2014). Coastline extraction using dual-polarimetric COSMO-SkyMed PingPong Mode SAR Data. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 11(1): 104–108
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Pajak M J, Leatherman S (2002). The high water line as shoreline indicator. J Coast Res, 18(2): 329–337
[31]
Pekel J F, Cottam A, Gorelick N, Belward A S (2016). High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633): 418–422
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Rahman A F, Dragoni D, El-Masri B (2011). Response of the Sundarbans coastline to sea level rise and decreased sediment flow: a remote sensing assessment. Remote Sens Environ, 115(12): 3121–3128
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Ryu J H, Won J S, Min K D (2002). Waterline extraction from Landsat TM data in a tidal flat: a case study in Gomso Bay, Korea. Remote Sens Environ, 83(3): 442–456
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Sankey T, Glenn N (2011). Landsat-5 TM and Lidar fusion for sub-pixel juniper tree cover estimates in a western rangeland. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 77(12): 1241–1248
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Santos P, Negri A J (1997). A comparison of the normalized difference vegetation index and rainfall for the Amazon and northeastern Brazil. J Appl Meteorol, 36(7): 958–965
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Shi Y F, Li X C (2010). Land use dynamic evolution simulation of the north branch of Yangtze River Estuary based on SLEUTH model. Modern Surveying & Mapping, 3: 003 (in Chinese)
[37]
Su W Z (2017). Measuring the past 20 years of urban-rural land growth in flood-prone areas in the developed Taihu Lake watershed, China. Front Earth Sci, 11(2): 361–371
[38]
Thieler E R, Himmelstoss E A, Zichichi J L, Ergul A (2009). The Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 4.0-An ArcGIS Extension for Calculating Shoreline Change. US Geological Survey
[39]
Wang F (1990). Fuzzy supervised classification of remote sensing images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 28(2): 194–201
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Wolf A F (2012). Using Worldview-2 Vis-NIR multispectral imagery to support land mapping and feature extraction using normalized difference index ratios SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing. International Society for Optics and Photonics, Vol 8390
[41]
Xie H, Luo X, Xu X, Pan H, Tong X (2016 a). Evaluation of Landsat 8 OLI imagery for unsupervised inland water extraction. Int J Remote Sens, 37(8): 1826–1844
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Xie H, Luo X, Xu X, Pan H, Tong X (2016 b). Automated subpixel surface water mapping from heterogeneous urban environments using Landsat 8 OLI Imagery. Remote Sens, 8(7): 584
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Xie H, Luo X, Xu X, Tong X, Jin Y, Pan H, Zhou B X (2014). New hyperspectral difference water index for the extraction of urban water bodies by the use of airborne hyperspectral images. J Appl Remote Sens, 8(1): 085098
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Xu X, Zhong Y, Zhang L (2014). A sub-pixel mapping method based on an attraction model for multiple shifted remotely sensed images. Neurocomputing, 134: 79–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Yang C, Everitt J H, Bradford J M (2008). Yield estimation from hyperspectral imagery using spectral angle mapper (SAM). Trans ASABE, 51(2): 729–737
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Yang Y, Liu Y, Zhou M, Zhang S, Zhan W, Sun C, Duan Y (2015). Landsat 8 OLI image based terrestrial water extraction from heterogeneous backgrounds using a reflectance homogenization approach. Remote Sens Environ, 171: 14–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003). Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 24(3): 583–594
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Zhou D, Zhao S, Liu S, Zhang L, Zhu C (2014). Surface urban heat island in China’s 32 major cities: spatial patterns and drivers. Remote Sens Environ, 152(152): 51–61
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was substantially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41401489 and 41376178), Shanghai Foundation for University Youth Scholars (Project No. ZZHY13033), and the Innovation Programme of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Project No. 15ZZ082).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(3426 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/