How geometry drives innovation in aortic valve repair

Abstract

Understanding the geometry and thus the possibility of repairing the aortic valve (AV) has evolved over time thanks to the integration of historical insights and technological advances. The aortic root geometry has proven to be central to understanding valve function. Today, with modern finite element models and flow studies supported by four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging, we have provided a better understanding of the importance of the sinuses of Valsalva in blood flow dynamics. Their presence reduces cusp stress, improves repair durability, and promotes the adoption of valve prostheses with incorporated sinuses. Looking to the future, the scientific community must push towards a better fusion of currently available technologies to address AV repair, towards personalizing procedures to fit the unique anatomy of each patient. New technologies, including artificial intelligence, can provide personalized surgical simulations. The goal is to make techniques more standardized, reproducible and accessible, while maintaining flexibility to address anatomical variability. Additionally, new materials and tools are being explored to further improve outcomes.

Keywords

Geometry / AV repair / AV / aortic root geometry / Sinuses of Valsalva / blood flow dynamics

References

[1] Sarsam MA.Remodeling of the aortic valve anulus.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1993;105:435-8

[2] David TE.An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1992;103:617-21

[3] Bierbach BO,Issa OA.Aortic root and cusp configuration determine aortic valve function.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2010;38:400-6

[4] Holubec T,Tuna M.Aortic valve repair in patients with aortic regurgitation: experience with the first 100 cases.Cor Vasa2013;55:e479-86

[5] Oechtering TH,Sieren M.Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) analysis of hemodynamics in valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2016;152:418-427.e1

[6] Robicsek F.Leonardo da Vinci and the sinuses of Valsalva.Ann Thorac Surg1991;52:328-35

[7] Thubrikar M,Shaner TW.The design of the normal aortic valve.Am J Physiol1981;241:H795-801

[8] Kunzelman KS,David TE,Verrier ED.Aortic root and valve relationships: impact on surgical repair.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1994;107:162-70

[9] Robicsek F,Fokin AA.Cause of degenerative disease of the trileaflet aortic valve: review of subject and presentation of a new theory.Ann Thorac Surg2002;73:1346-54

[10] Robicsek F,Cook JW.The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function?.Ann Thorac Surg2004;77:177-85

[11] Robicsek F.Mechanical stress as cause of aortic valve disease. Presentation of a new aortic root prosthesis.Acta Chir Belg2002;102:1-6

[12] Thubrikar M,Nolan SP.The mechanism of opening of the aortic valve.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1979;77:863-70

[13] El-Nashar H,Tseng YT.Multiscale structure and function of the aortic valve apparatus.Physiol Rev2024;104:1487-532 PMCID:PMC11495199

[14] Rizzi S,Pesce M.Engineering efforts to refine compatibility and duration of aortic valve replacements: an overview of previous expectations and new promises.Front Cardiovasc Med2022;9:863136 PMCID:PMC9058060

[15] Ho SY.Structure and anatomy of the aortic root.Eur J Echocardiogr2009;10:i3-10

[16] Vesely I.The role of elastin in aortic valve mechanics.J Biomech1998;31:115-23

[17] Choo SJ,Olomon JP.Aortic root geometry: pattern of differences between leaflets and sinuses of Valsalva.J Heart Valve Dis1999;8:407-15

[18] Charitos EI.Anatomy of the aortic root: implications for valve-sparing surgery.Ann Cardiothorac Surg2013;2:53-6 PMCID:PMC3741810

[19] Sievers HH, Hemmer W, Beyersdorf F, et al.; Working Group for Aortic Valve Surgery of German Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. The everyday used nomenclature of the aortic root components: the tower of Babel?.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2012;41:478-82

[20] Giebels C,Schäfers HJ.Aortic root remodeling.Ann Cardiothorac Surg2023;12:369-76 PMCID:PMC10405338

[21] Boodhwani M.Aortic valve repair.Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2009;14:266-80

[22] Van Dyck M, Glineur D, de Kerchove L, El Khoury G. Complications after aortic valve repair and valve-sparing procedures.Ann Cardiothorac Surg2013;2:130-9 PMCID:PMC3741815

[23] le Polain de Waroux JB,Robert A.Mechanisms of recurrent aortic regurgitation after aortic valve repair: predictive value of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging2009;2:931-9

[24] Schäfers HJ,Aicher D.A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2006;132:436-8

[25] Kunihara T,Rodionycheva S.Preoperative aortic root geometry and postoperative cusp configuration primarily determine long-term outcome after valve-preserving aortic root repair.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2012;143:1389-95.e1

[26] Marom G,Rosenfeld M,Raanani E.Aortic root numeric model: correlation between intraoperative effective height and diastolic coaptation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2013;145:303-4

[27] Grande-Allen KJ,Reinhall PG.Mechanisms of aortic valve incompetence: finite-element modeling of Marfan syndrome.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2001;122:946-54

[28] Weltert L,Afferrante L.Annular dilatation and loss of sino-tubular junction in aneurysmatic aorta: implications on leaflet quality at the time of surgery. A finite element study.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2013;17:8-12 PMCID:PMC3686386

[29] Marom G,Raanani E.Systematic adjustment of root dimensions to cusp size in aortic valve repair: a computer simulation.Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2024;38:ivae024 PMCID:PMC10902611

[30] Jahanyar J,Arabkhani B.Functional and pathomorphological anatomy of the aortic valve and root for aortic valve sparing surgery in tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.Ann Cardiothorac Surg2023;12:179-93 PMCID:PMC10248914

[31] Salica A,Morbiducci U.The combined role of sinuses of Valsalva and flow pulsatility improves energy loss of the aortic valve.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2016;49:1222-7

[32] Pisani G,Ieropoli O.Role of the sinuses of Valsalva on the opening of the aortic valve.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2013;145:999-1003

[33] Reul H,Giersiepen M,Hirtz V.The geometry of the aortic root in health, at valve disease and after valve replacement.J Biomech1990;23:181-91

[34] Soncini M,Zinicchino S.Finite element simulations of the physiological aortic root and valve sparing corrections.J Mech Med Biol2006;6:91-9

[35] Weinberg EJ.Transient, three-dimensional, multiscale simulations of the human aortic valve.Cardiovasc Eng2007;7:140-55

[36] Chandra S,Sucosky P.Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: implications for calcific aortic valve disease.Biomech Model Mechanobiol2012;11:1085-96

[37] Kaiser AD,Schiavone N,Marsden AL.Controlled comparison of simulated hemodynamics across tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.Ann Biomed Eng2022;50:1053-72 PMCID:PMC10775905

[38] Guo Z,Litt H.Towards patient-specific surgical planning for bicuspid aortic valve repair: fully automated segmentation of the aortic valve in 4D CT. In: 2025 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI); 2025 April 14-17; Houston, TX, USA. IEEE; 2025. pp. 1-5.

[39] Boodhwani M.Aortic valve repair: indications and outcomes.Curr Cardiol Rep2014;16:490

[40] Zeeshan A,Johnston DR.Durability of aortic valve cusp repair with and without annular support.Ann Thorac Surg2018;105:739-48

[41] Ehrlich T,Vojacek J.State-of-the art bicuspid aortic valve repair in 2020.Prog Cardiovasc Dis2020;63:457-64

[42] De Paulis R,de Kerchove L.Current status of aortic valve repair surgery.Eur Heart J2025;46:1394-411

[43] Mastrobuoni S,Veen KM.Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the reimplantation (David) technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis on survival and clinical outcome.Ann Cardiothorac Surg2023;12:149-58 PMCID:PMC10248907