Innovation in aortic surgery requires more than AI: a perspective on data governance and shared decision-making

Abstract

Clinical decision-making for individuals undergoing valvular and aortic surgery remains challenging, particularly in young patients facing lifelong risk and repeated interventions. As predictive technologies such as artificial intelligence and advanced statistical modelling evolve, the surgical community must ensure that key foundational elements, namely data governance, including data standardization, and regulation, are firmly in place. Without high-quality, standardized, and ethically governed data, predictive models risk offering misleading guidance rather than meaningful personalization. While data governance ensures the scientific robustness of predictive technologies, shared decision-making (SDM) ensures these innovations remain closely aligned with the lived experiences, values, and preferences of individual patients. This perspective emphasizes that advancing decision-making in aortic surgery requires deliberate investment in building data ecosystems and fostering SDM communication practices, ensuring that innovation is both scientifically sound and truly responsive to patient needs.

Keywords

Innovation / artificial intelligence / data governance / shared decision-making

References

[1] Vaidya YP.Artificial intelligence: the future of cardiothoracic surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2025;169:1265-70

[2] Joshi G,Araveeti SR,Garg H.FDA-approved artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled medical devices: an updated landscape.Electronics2024;13:498

[3] The Data Governance Basics. Definitions of data governance. Available from https://datagovernance.com/the-data-governance-basics/definitions-of-data-governance/ [accessed 09 February 2026].

[4] Thijssen CGE,Bons LR.Novel biomarkers associated with thoracic aortic disease.Int J Cardiol2023;378:115-22

[5] McKeown A,Harrison P,Sheehan M.Ethical issues in consent for the reuse of data in health data platforms.Sci Eng Ethics2021;27:9 PMCID:PMC7862505

[6] Ienca M,Hurst S,Lovis C.Considerations for ethics review of big data health research: a scoping review.PLoS One2018;13:e0204937 PMCID:PMC6181558

[7] Lansac E,Joseph A.The first international consortium for health outcomes measurement (ICHOM) standard dataset for reporting outcomes in heart valve disease: moving from device- to patient-centered outcomes.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2025;18:e000128

[8] Ohdsi. The Book of OHDSI: Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics. OHDSI, 2019. Available from https://www.amazon.com/OHDSI-Observational-Health-Sciences-Informatics/dp/1088855199 [accessed 09 February 2026].

[9] van der Ven CC, Kluin J, Takkenberg JJ, et al.; on behalf of the Aortic Valve Research Network Investigators. Data Resource Profile: Heart Valve Society Aortic Valve Database (HVS AV Database).J Heart Valve Soc2024;1:30494826241296370

[10] EACTS. EACTS Adult Cardiac Database. Available from https://www.eacts.org/quality-improvement/adult-cardiac-database/ [accessed 09 February 2026].

[11] Jasinski MJ,Gocol R.Bicuspid aortic valve repair: outcomes after 17 years of experience.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2021;60:1053-61 PMCID:PMC8603241

[12] Topol E. Deep medicine: how artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. 1th ed. Basic Books, 2019. Available from https://www.amazon.com/Deep-Medicine-Artificial-Intelligence-Healthcare/dp/1541644638 [accessed 09 February 2026].

[13] Creazzo G,Saitta S.Deployment of a digital twin using the coupled momentum method for fluid-structure interaction: a case study for aortic aneurysm.Comput Biol Med2025;190:110084

[14] Bratt A,Ryan WJ.Deep learning improves the temporal reproducibility of aortic measurement.J Digit Imaging2021;34:1183-9 PMCID:PMC8554928

[15] Korteland NM,Koolbergen DR.Does the use of a decision aid improve decision making in prosthetic heart valve selection? A multicenter randomized trial.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2017;10:e003178

[16] Stiggelbout AM,De Haes JC.Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice.Patient Educ Couns2015;98:1172-9