The need for precision when describing the aortic root

Abstract

Our commentary addresses the issues raised with two manuscripts published in the Special Issue of the Journal edited by Professor de Paulis about the surgical approach to the aortic root. It is unquestionable that appropriate surgical treatment requires a detailed understanding of the underlying anatomy. In the first article, Professor de Paulis et al. show the anatomical precision that can now be achieved using computed tomography. In the second article, the same group shows how an appreciation of this anatomy dictates their surgical approach. In our commentary, we highlight that the terms used in the two manuscripts indicate that the confusion identified in a questionnaire organized in 2012 about terminological issues remains unresolved, in particular regarding the definition of the enigmatic valvar “annulus”. We provide anatomical illustrations that demonstrate the ongoing problems. We also emphasize that bisecting planes of the root, rather than off-center cuts, should be used when taking the measurements of the components of the root that help the surgeon make the optimal repair. We finish by stressing the need for equal specificity in the words used to describe the components, pointing out that “cusp” is inadequate as a synonym for the valvar leaflets, especially since more often the valvar sinuses are described as “cusps”.

Keywords

Annulus / virtual basal ring / sinotubular junction / leaflets / sinuses

References

[1] Irace FG,de Paulis R.CT scan as a tool to evaluate root reconstruction and aortic valve repair.Vessel Plus2025;9:4

[2] Anderson RH.Clinical anatomy of the aortic root.Heart2000;84:670-3 PMCID:PMC1729505

[3] Tretter JT,Franklin RCG.Expert consensus statement: anatomy, imaging, and nomenclature of congenital aortic root malformations.Cardiol Young2023;33:1060-8

[4] Izawa Y,Tretter JT.Normative aortic valvar measurements in adults using cardiac computed tomography- a potential guide to further sophisticate aortic valve-sparing surgery.Circ J2021;85:1059-67

[5] Tretter JT,Najm HK.Multi-modality imaging evaluation and pre-surgical planning for aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aortic root aneurysm.Ann Cardiothorac Surg2023;12:295-317 PMCID:PMC10405341

[6] Sievers HH, Hemmer W, Beyersdorf F, et al.; Working Group for Aortic Valve Surgery of the German Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. The everyday used nomenclature of the aortic root components: the tower of Babel? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:478-82.

[7] Merrick AF,Ho SY.Anatomy of the muscular subpulmonary infundibulum with regard to the Ross procedure.Ann Thorac Surg2000;69:556-61

[8] Folino G,De Paulis R.Comparison of the “Modine modification” with the standard reimplantation technique: indications and options for improvement.Vessel Plus2025;9:9

[9] Tretter JT,Anderson RH.Anatomical predictors of conduction damage after transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve.Open Heart2019;6:e000972 PMCID:PMC6519402

[10] Mori S,Tahara N.The differences between bisecting and off-center cuts of the aortic root: the three-dimensional anatomy of the aortic root reconstructed from the living heart.Echocardiography2017;34:453-61

[11] Tretter JT,Saremi F.Variations in rotation of the aortic root and membranous septum with implications for transcatheter valve implantation.Heart2018;104:999-1005