Echocardiographic cardiac views classification using whale optimization and weighted support vector machine
Bernabe Canqui-Flores , Romel P. Melgarejo-Bolivar , Alfredo Tumi-Figueroa , S. Thirukumaran , G. Meena Devi , Sudhakar Sengan
Vessel Plus ›› 2024, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 29
Echocardiographic cardiac views classification using whale optimization and weighted support vector machine
Aim: A significant medical diagnostic tool for monitoring cardiovascular health and function is 2D electrocardiograms. For computerized echocardiogram (echo) analysis, recognizing how this device performs is essential. This paper primarily focuses on detecting the transducer's viewpoint in cardiac echo videos using spatiotemporal data. It distinguishes between different viewpoints by monitoring the heart's function and rate throughout the cycle of heartbeats. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) examination sizes are the first steps toward computerized classification of cardiac imaging tests. Since clinical analysis frequently starts with automatic classification, the current view can enhance the detection of Cardiac Vascular Disease (CVD).
Methods: This research article uses a Machine Learning (ML) algorithm called the Integrated Metaheuristic Technique (IMT), which is the Whale Optimization Algorithm with Weighted Support Vector Machine (WOA-WSVM).
Results: The parameters in the classification are optimized with the assistance of WOA, and the echo is classified using WSVM. The WOA-WSVM classifies the images effectively and achieves an accuracy of 98.4%.
Conclusion: The numerical analysis states that the WOA-WSVM technique outperforms the existing state-of-the-art algorithms.
Cardiac vascular disease / cardiac view / machine learning / classification / image processing / accuracy
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Doppala BP, Midhunchakkravarthy, Bhattacharyya D. Premature detection of cardiomegaly using hybrid machine learning technique.J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst2020;12:490-8Available from: https://www.jardcs.org/abstract.php?id=4619 [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2024]. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
SaiSowmya B, Radha V, Kiran I, PavanKumar T. An efficient way of detecting change in tsunami disaster using CNN.J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst2020;12:1128-33Available from: https://www.jardcs.org/abstract.php?id=4369 [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2024]. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
Sudha GS, Praveena M, Rani GS, Harish TNSK, Charisma A, Asish A. Classification and detection of diabetic retinopathy using deep learning.Int J Sci Technol Res2020;9:3186-92Available from: https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/apr2020/Classification-And-Detection-Of-Diabetic-Retinopathy-Using-Deep-Learning.pdf [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2024]. |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
Priyanka Chandra C, Thirupathi Rao N, Debnath B, Tai-hoon K. Segmentation of natural images with K-means and hierarchical algorithm based on mixture of pearson distributions.J Sci Indust Res2021;80:707-15 |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
Dakshina Murthy AS, Karthikeyan T, Omkar Lakshmi Jagan B. Clinical model machine learning for gait observation cardiovascular disease diagnosis.Int J Pharm Res2024;16:3373-8Available from: http://www.ijpronline.com/ViewArticleDetail.aspx?ID=18315 [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2024]. |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
Siva Kumar P, Anbazhaghan N, Razia S, Sivani M, Pravalika S, Harshini AS. Prediction of cardiovascular disease using classification techniques with high accuracy.J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst2020;12:1134-9Available from: https://www.jardcs.org/abstract.php?id=4370 [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2024]. |
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
Noi PT, Kappas M. Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using sentinel-2 imagery.Sensors2017;18:18 PMCID:PMC5796274 |
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
ECHO. 2022. Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/c/echo2022 [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2024] |
| [71] |
EchoNet-dynamic. Available from: https://stanfordaimi.azurewebsites.net/datasets/834e1cd1-92f7-4268-9daa-d359198b310a [Last accessed on 4 Jul 2024] |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |