Selecting conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: caution regarding the right internal mammary artery

Abstract

This narrative review summarizes the angiographic and clinical outcome results of the most common coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) conduits. The left internal mammary artery is the preferred first conduit to bypass the left anterior descending artery due to superior long-term survival and graft patency. Recent studies suggest the radial artery may be the preferred second conduit for the circumflex or right coronary artery territories, challenging the belief that the right internal mammary artery is the best choice. Despite their historical high failure rates, saphenous vein grafts continue to be widely used as secondary conduits. Several recent studies report suboptimal rates of right internal mammary artery graft failure, with clinical outcomes comparable to or worse than saphenous veins. The suboptimal rates of RIMA graft failure may be attributed to several factors such as improvements in vein graft failure rates, the use of in situ and non-left anterior descending artery grafting configurations, and skeletonized harvesting techniques. While observational studies favor multiple over single arterial grafting, randomized studies are needed for confirmation. The ongoing Randomized comparison of the clinical Outcome of single vs. Multiple Arterial grafts (ROMA) trial aims to determine if multiple arterial grafting reduces major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality and how secondary conduit selection influences these outcomes. Greater adoption of arterial grafting strategies is likely to come from high-quality evidence of benefit and safety from ongoing and future large pragmatic trials.

Keywords

Coronary artery bypass grafting / left internal mammary artery / right internal mammary artery / radial artery / saphenous vein graft / multiple arterial grafting

References

[1] Yusuf S,Passamani E.Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration.Lancet1994;344:563-70

[2] Hillis LD,Anderson JL.2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for thoracic surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.J Am Coll Cardiol2011;58:e123-210

[3] Aldea GS,Pal J.Society of Thoracic SurgeonsThe society of thoracic surgeons clinical practice guidelines on arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Thorac Surg2016;101:801-9

[4] Gaudino M,Fremes SE.RADIAL InvestigatorsAngiographic outcome of coronary artery bypass grafts: the radial artery database international alliance.Ann Thorac Surg2020;109:688-94

[5] Gaudino M,Robinson NB.Angiographic patency of coronary artery bypass conduits: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.J Am Heart Assoc2021;10:e019206 PMCID:PMC8174193

[6] Lamy A,Sheth T.Rivaroxaban, aspirin, or both to prevent early coronary bypass graft occlusion: the COMPASS-CABG study.J Am Coll Cardiol2019;73:121-30

[7] Alboom M,Sheth T.Conduit selection and early graft failure in coronary artery bypass surgery: a post hoc analysis of the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) coronary artery bypass grafting study.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2023;165:1080-9.e1

[8] Gaudino M,Rahouma M.ART InvestigatorsComparison of long-term clinical outcomes of skeletonized vs pedicled internal thoracic artery harvesting techniques in the arterial revascularization trial.JAMA Cardiol2021;6:1380-6 PMCID:PMC8482293

[9] Lamy A,Sheth T.COMPASS InvestigatorsSkeletonized vs pedicled internal mammary artery graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery: a post hoc analysis from the COMPASS trial.JAMA Cardiol2021;6:1042-9

[10] Lawton JS,Bangalore S.Writing Committee Members2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines.J Am Coll Cardiol2022;79:197-215

[11] Neumann FJ,Ahlsson A.2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization.Eur Heart J2018;40:87-165

[12] Harik L,Dimagli A.Choice of conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting: technical, anatomic, and pharmacologic considerations.Vessel Plus2023;7:30

[13] Gaudino M,An KR.Graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting and its association with patient characteristics and clinical events: a pooled individual patient data analysis of clinical trials with imaging follow-up.Circulation2023;148:1305-15

[14] Kulik A,Boronat V.Intensive versus moderate statin therapy and early graft occlusion after coronary bypass surgery: the aggressive cholesterol therapy to inhibit vein graft events randomized clinical trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2019;157:151-61.e1

[15] Kulik A,Voisine P.Aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone after coronary artery bypass grafting: the clopidogrel after surgery for coronary artery disease (CASCADE) trial.Circulation2010;122:2680-7

[16] Zhao Q,Xu Z.Effect of ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor alone, or aspirin alone on saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA2018;319:1677-86 PMCID:PMC5933396

[17] Willemsen LM,Peper J.Effect of adding ticagrelor to standard aspirin on saphenous vein graft patency in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (POPular CABG): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Circulation2020;142:1799-807

[18] Alexander JH,Harrington RA.PREVENT IV InvestigatorsEfficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA2005;294:2446-54

[19] Kulik A,Boronat V,Ruel M.Ticagrelor versus aspirin and vein graft patency after coronary bypass: a randomized trial.J Card Surg2022;37:563-70

[20] Buxton BF,Ruengsakulrach P.Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2003;125:1363-71

[21] Deb S,Singh SK,Laupacis A.RAPS InvestigatorsRadial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study).J Am Coll Cardiol2012;60:28-35

[22] Collins P,Chong CF.Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial InvestigatorsRadial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up.Circulation2008;117:2859-64

[23] Petrovic I,Peric M.Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up.J Cardiothorac Surg2015;10:127 PMCID:PMC4606847

[24] Nasso G,Bonifazi R,Bozzetti G.Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass grafting: direct comparison of 4 strategies--results of the stand-in-Y mammary study.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2009;137:1093-100

[25] Song SW,Lee HJ.Comparison of the radial artery and saphenous vein as composite grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.Korean Circ J2012;42:107-12 PMCID:PMC3291720

[26] Gaudino M,Benedetto U.Use rate and outcome in bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Am Heart Assoc2018;7:e009361 PMCID:PMC6015367

[27] Deng MX,Lee G.Angiographic patency of coronary artery bypass conduits: an updated network meta-analysis of randomized trials.Braz J Cardiovasc Surg2022;37:7-31 PMCID:PMC9454285

[28] Yokoyama Y,Kuno T.Graft patency of a second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2022;34:102-9

[29] Gaudino M,Di Franco A.Radial artery versus saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2022;62:ezac345

[30] Taggart DP,Gerry S.Arterial Revascularization Trial InvestigatorsBilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts at 10 years.N Engl J Med2019;380:437-46

[31] Lamy A,Prabhakaran D.CORONARY InvestigatorsFive-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting.N Engl J Med2016;375:2359-68

[32] Hayward PA,Hare DL.Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the radial artery patency and clinical outcomes trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010;139:60-7

[33] Gaudino M,Fremes S.RADIAL InvestigatorsRadial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery.N Engl J Med2018;378:2069-77

[34] Gaudino M,Rahouma M.Radial artery versus right internal thoracic artery versus saphenous vein as the second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.J Am Heart Assoc2019;8:e010839 PMCID:PMC6497341

[35] de Oliveira Sá MPB,Escobar RR.Patency of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery in coronary bypass graft surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.Int J Surg2014;12:666-72

[36] Hayashi Y,Maekawa A.Effect of modified proximal anastomosis of the free right internal thoracic artery: piggyback and foldback techniques.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2016;22:265-72 PMCID:PMC4986556

[37] Shroyer AL,Hattler B.Veterans affairs randomized on/off bypass (ROOBY) study groupOn-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery.N Engl J Med2009;361:1827-37

[38] Antonopoulos AS,Oikonomou EK.SAFINOUS-CABG (Saphenous Vein Graft Failure - An Outcomes Study in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) groupDevelopment of a risk score for early saphenous vein graft failure: an individual patient data meta-analysis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2020;160:116-27.e4

[39] Tian M,Sun H.No-touch versus conventional vein harvesting techniques at 12 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: multicenter randomized, controlled trial.Circulation2021;144:1120-9

[40] Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial InvestigatorsThe effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass grafts.N Engl J Med1997;336:153-63

[41] Saw J,Mayo J.Ticagrelor and aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Heart2016;102:763-9

[42] Sandner S,Angiolillo DJ.Association of dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor with vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA2022;328:554-62

[43] Solo K,Kabali C.Antithrombotic treatment after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ2019;367:l5476 PMCID:PMC6785742

[44] Sun X,Wang W.Off-pump skeletonized versus pedicled left internal mammary artery grafting: mid-term results.J Card Surg2015;30:494-9

[45] Mannacio V,De Amicis V,Vosa C.Randomized flow capacity comparison of skeletonized and pedicled left internal mammary artery.Ann Thorac Surg2011;91:24-30

[46] Benedetto U,Gerry S.Arterial Revascularization Trial investigatorsPedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications: insights from the arterial revascularization trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2016;152:270-6

[47] de Oliveira Sá MPB,Escobar RR.Skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery and risk of sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 4817 patients.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2013;16:849-57 PMCID:PMC3653453

[48] Amano A,Hirose H.Skeletonized radial artery grafting: improved angiographic results.Ann Thorac Surg2002;73:1880-7

[49] Calafiore AM,Iaco AL.Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: midterm results of pedicled versus skeletonized conduits.Ann Thorac Surg1999;67:1637-42

[50] Hirose H,Takanashi S.Skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery grafting for patients with diabetes.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2003;2:287-92

[51] Kai M,Soga Y.Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic arteries in insulin-dependent diabetics.Ann Thorac Surg2007;84:32-6

[52] Sazzad MF,Chanda PK.Short term clinical and angiographic outcome of skeletonized harvesting technique of left internal mammary artery, compared to pedicled harvesting for coronary revascularization.Univ Heart J2016;12:82-7

[53] Dimagli A,Harik L.Angiographic outcomes for arterial and venous conduits used in CABG.J Clin Med2023;12:2022 PMCID:PMC10004690

[54] Dreifaldt M,Geijer H,Bodin L.Pedicled versus skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafts: a randomized trial.Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann2021;29:490-7 PMCID:PMC8242404

[55] Tatoulis J,Fuller JA.The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit - 5,766 patients and 991 angiograms.Ann Thorac Surg2011;92:9-17

[56] Glineur D,Poncelet A.Comparison of bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization using in situ or Y graft configurations: a prospective randomized clinical, functional, and angiographic midterm evaluation.Circulation2008;118:S216-21

[57] Glineur D,Hanet C.Bilateral internal thoracic artery configuration for coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized trial.Circ Cardiovasc Interv2016;9:e003518 PMCID:PMC4949001

[58] Calafiore AM,Vitolla G.Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y grafts.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2000;120:990-6

[59] Buttar SN,Taggart DP.Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis.Heart2017;103:1419-26

[60] Schwann TA,Wallace A.Operative outcomes of multiple-arterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting.Ann Thorac Surg2018;105:1109-19

[61] Thuijs DJFM,Stone GW.Outcomes following surgical revascularization with single versus bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts in patients with left main coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the EXCEL trial.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2019;55:501-10

[62] Sabik JF 3rd,Badhwar V.Multiarterial vs single-arterial coronary surgery: 10-year follow-up of 1 million patients.Ann Thorac Surg2024;117:780-8

[63] Thuijs DJFM,Milojevic M.SYNTAX Extended Survival InvestigatorsLong-term survival after coronary bypass surgery with multiple versus single arterial grafts.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2022;61:925-33 PMCID:PMC8947797

[64] Taggart DP,Gray AM.ART InvestigatorsRandomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts.N Engl J Med2016;375:2540-9

[65] Schwann TA,Wallace A.Bilateral internal thoracic artery versus radial artery multi-arterial bypass grafting: a report from the STS database.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2019;56:926-34

[66] Venardos N,Cleveland JC Jr.Training for multiple arterial grafting: a thoracic surgery resident survey.Ann Thorac Surg2021;111:1901-7

[67] Benedetto U,Gaudino M.How safe is it to train residents to perform coronary surgery with multiple arterial grafting? Nineteen years of training at a single institution.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2017;29:12-22

[68] Guo LR,Tong MZ.Does the trainee’s level of experience impact on patient safety and clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass surgery?.J Card Surg2008;23:1-5

[69] Taggart DP,Gerry S.ART investigatorsEffect of total arterial grafting in the arterial revascularization trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2022;163:1002-9.e6

[70] Gaudino M,Hameed I,Girardi LN.Differences in long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts and the association with sex.JAMA Cardiol2020;6:401-9 PMCID:PMC7758835

[71] Gaudino M,Bakaeen FG.Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trial-rationale and study protocol.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2017;52:1031-40

[72] Gurevitch J,Locker C.Technical aspects of double-skeletonized internal mammary artery grafting.Ann Thorac Surg2000;69:841-6

[73] Gaudino M,Pragliola C.Arterial versus venous bypass grafts in patients with in-stent restenosis.Circulation2005;112:I265-9

[74] Goldman S,Holman W.Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial.JAMA2011;305:167-74

[75] Glineur D,de Kerchove L.Angiographic predictors of 3-year patency of bypass grafts implanted on the right coronary artery system: a prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery, saphenous vein, and right internal thoracic artery grafts.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2011;142:980-8

[76] Mannacio VA,Antignan A,Vosa C.Aspirin plus clopidogrel for optimal platelet inhibition following off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the CRYSSA (prevention of coronary arteRY bypaSS occlusion after off-pump procedures) randomised study.Heart2012;98:1710-5

[77] Hattler B,Shroyer AL.Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study GroupOff-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: results from the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial.Circulation2012;125:2827-35

[78] Dreifaldt M,Bodin L,Zagozdzon L.The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Thorac Surg2013;96:105-11

[79] Houlind K,Holme SJ.DOORS Study GroupGraft patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is inferior even with identical heparinization protocols: results from the Danish on-pump versus off-pump randomization study (DOORS).J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014;148:1812-9.e2

[80] Kim MS,Kim JS,Jang MJ.Saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery as a Y-composite graft: Five-year angiographic and clinical results of a randomized trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018;156:1424-33.e1