Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the elderly: an umbrella review

Barbara Antonazzo , Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai , Antonino G. M. Marullo , Giacomo Frati , Stefano Ronzoni , Giovanni A. Chiariello , Francesco Versaci , Arturo Giordano

Vessel Plus ›› 2020, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 3

PDF
Vessel Plus ›› 2020, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) :3 DOI: 10.20517/2574-1209.2019.33
Systematic Review
Systematic Review

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the elderly: an umbrella review

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: The management of aortic stenosis has seen momentous changes thanks to the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI, i.e., transcatheter aortic valve replacement). Indications to TAVI have expanded progressively to intermediate- and low-risk patients, but trends in life expectancy have led to an increase of elderly but fit individuals with aortic stenosis eligible for TAVI.

Methods: We reviewed the current evidence base on TAVI in the elderly by conducting an umbrella review (i.e., overview of systematic reviews), based on a formal bibliographic search for systematic reviews on TAVI in elderly patients (≥ 65 years). Key, study, patient, procedural, and outcome data were extracted, and validity formally appraised with the Oxman-Guyatt index.

Results: From 71 citations, eight reviews were included (totaling 39 studies and 8579 patients): five systematic reviews, and three meta-analyses. Topics of interest were cognitive function before and after TAVI, predictive role of muscle mass and frailty on post-TAVI outcomes, comparative safety and effectiveness of TAVI, and role of rehabilitation to improve patient outlook after TAVI. Thirty-three additional studies were retrieved by means of snowballing, emphasizing the role of multidimensional assessment of elderly patients scheduled for TAVI, in order to maximize its appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety.

Conclusion: It is crucial to consider frailty scores, as well as nutrition and functional status, in addition to established surgical risk scores, in elderly patients considered for TAVI to improve risk prediction, reinforcing the favorable impact of this therapy to improve cognitive function.

Keywords

Aortic stenosis / elderly / transcatheter aortic valve implantation / transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Barbara Antonazzo, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Antonino G. M. Marullo, Giacomo Frati, Stefano Ronzoni, Giovanni A. Chiariello, Francesco Versaci, Arturo Giordano. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the elderly: an umbrella review. Vessel Plus, 2020, 4(1): 3 DOI:10.20517/2574-1209.2019.33

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Harris AW,Otto CM.Aortic stenosis: guidelines and evidence gaps..Cardiol Clin2020;38:55-63

[2]

Kwiecień A,Filipiak K,Kaczmarczyk M.Surgical treatment of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis in the modern era - review..Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol2018;15:188-95 PMCID:PMC6180026

[3]

Baber U,Moreno PR.Aortic stenosis: role of balloon aortic valvuloplasty..Cardiol Clin2013;31:327-36

[4]

Cribier A,Bash A,Tron C.Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description..Circulation2002;106:3006-8

[5]

Bohula May EA.Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: history and current status..Trends Cardiovasc Med2013;23:172-8

[6]

Giordano A,Frati G.Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Clinical, Interventional and Surgical Perspectives.2019;ChamSpringer Nature Publishing

[7]

Boskovski MT,McCabe JM.Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a review of a disruptive technology in aortic valve surgery..JAMA Surg2019;Epub ahead of print [DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4449]

[8]

Adams HSL,Newcomb A,Whitbourn RJ.Contemporary review of severe aortic stenosis..Intern Med J2019;49:297-305

[9]

Biondi-Zoccai G.Umbrella Reviews: Evidence Synthesis with Overviews of Reviews and Meta-Epidemiologic Studies.2016;ChamSpringer International Publishing

[10]

Oxman AD.Validation of an index of the quality of review articles..J Clin Epidemiol1991;44:1271-8

[11]

Anand A,Visvanathan A,Cowell J.The relationship between preoperative frailty and outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis..Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes2017;3:123-32 PMCID:PMC5862025

[12]

Fink HA,MacDonald R,Olson CM.Intermediate- and long-term cognitive outcomes after cardiovascular procedures in older adults: a systematic review..Ann Intern Med2015;163:107-17

[13]

Furukawa H.Frailty in cardiothoracic surgery: systematic review of the literature..Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2015;63:425-33

[14]

Lai KS,Saleem M.Cognitive outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review..Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol2015;2015:209569 PMCID:PMC4345202

[15]

Mohammadi M,Chaney S.Is transcatheter aortic valve replacement a safe treatment for elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis?.J Am Assoc Nurse Pract2016;28:387-92

[16]

Ribeiro GS,Deresz LF,Pontes MR.Cardiac rehabilitation programme after transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: Systematic review and meta-analysis..Eur J Prev Cardiol2017;24:688-97

[17]

Sepehri A,Hassan A,Shaw-Daigle C.The impact of frailty on outcomes after cardiac surgery: a systematic review..J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2014;148:3110-7

[18]

Soud M,Ho G,Cejudo-Tejeda M.Usefulness of skeletal muscle area detected by computed tomography to predict mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis study..Int J Cardiovasc Imaging2019;35:1141-7

[19]

Graziani F,Locorotondo G,Trani C.When is compassionate appropriate for end-stage aortic valve stenosis?.Minerva Cardioangiol2018;66:221-2

[20]

Zhang X,Lan R,Kang L.Meta-analysis comparing results of transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis..Am J Cardiol2020;125:449-58

[21]

Gatto L,Romagnoli E,Prati F.New-generation devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation..Minerva Cardioangiol2018;66:747-61

[22]

Spaccarotella C,De Rosa S.Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients at intermediate surgical risk..Int J Cardiol2017;243:161-8

[23]

Presbitero P,Pagnotta P,Rossi ML.Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid anatomy: procedural results with two different types of valves..Minerva Cardioangiol2018;66:129-35

[24]

Repossini A,Solinas M,Passaretti B.Stentless sutureless and transcatheter valves: a comparison of the hemodynamic performance of different prostheses concept..Minerva Cardioangiol2018;66:180-90

[25]

Santarpino G,Specchia L,Nicoletti A.Sutureless aortic valve replacement vs. transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a review of a single center experience..Minerva Cardioangiol2018;66:160-2

[26]

Mishra S.Will percutaneous valves replace the surgical valves: Another one bites the dust?.Indian Heart J2016;68:249-51 PMCID:PMC4911450

[27]

Giordano A,Ferraro P,Testa L.Outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation after prior balloon aortic valvuloplasty..J Invasive Cardiol2018;30:380-5

[28]

Murdoch DJ,Ye J,Hensey M.Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement - 10 years later..N Engl J Med2019;380:1773-4

[29]

Giordano A,Ferraro P,Avellino R.Propensity-score-adjusted comparison of Evolut vs. Portico devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation..J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)2019;20:351-7

[30]

Giordano A,Ferraro P,Conte S.Comparative one-month safety and effectiveness of five leading new-generation devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation..Sci Rep2019;9:17098 PMCID:PMC6864033

[31]

Orimo H.Reviewing the definition of elderly..Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi2006;43:27-34

[32]

World Health Organization: Proposed working definition of an older person in Africa for the MDS Project. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/ [Last accessed on 17 Jan 2020]

PDF

45

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/